Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1986–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
London v. Stategreen2 sentences2020London v. State, 490 S.W.3d 503, 507 (Tex. Crim. 2019London v. State, 490 S.W.3d 503, 507 (Tex. Crim. | 4 | 4 |
Cardenas, Jose Juangreen2 sentences2017Cardenas v. State, 423 S.W.3d 396, 399 (Tex. Crim. 2014“Convicted defendants have constructive notice of mandatory court costs set by statute and the opportunity to object to the assessment of court costs against them for the first time on appeal or in a proceeding under Article 103.008 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.” Cardenas v. State, 423 S.W.3d 396, 398-99 (Tex.Crim.App.2014); see also Johnson, 423 S.W.3d at 394-96 (holding that a bill of costs is not required to support any particular amount of court costs). | 2 | 2 |
Johnson, Manley Dewaynegreen1 sentence2014“Convicted defendants have constructive notice of mandatory court costs set by statute and the opportunity to object to the assessment of court costs against them for the first time on appeal or in a proceeding under Article 103.008 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.” Cardenas v. State, 423 S.W.3d 396, 398-99 (Tex.Crim.App.2014); see also Johnson, 423 S.W.3d at 394-96 (holding that a bill of costs is not required to support any particular amount of court costs). | 1 | 1 |
Blakes v. Stategreen1 sentence1986Blakes v. State, 634 S.W.2d 319, 320 (Tex.Crim.App.1982). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.