Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Boykin v. Stategreen1 sentence2015The Court is expected to interpret the facts presented to it in an effort to rule based on the intent of the legislators in composing the statue,." Boykin v. State 818 S.W, 2d 782, 785 (Tex. C r i m , App. 19*> 1). | 1 | 1 |
Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleurgreen1 sentence2015In short, section 38.111 (and the Twelfth Court of Appeals’ interpretation of that statute) presents an “irrebutable presumption” (which the Supreme Court criticized in Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur, 414 U.S. 632, 648 (1974)) that Schlittler’s son must, at all times and in all respects, be protected from his own father. 27 Additionally, this Court intimated that the State’s interest in protecting children decreases with age.15 Henderson, 962 S.W.2d at 562-63 . | 1 | 1 |
City of Athens, Texas v. James MacAvoygreen1 sentence2012See City of Athens v. MacAvoy, 353 S.W.3d 905, 911 (Tex. App.—Tyler 2011, pet. denied) (“[T]he statutory scheme for hearing examiners is organized around the examiners acting as fact finders with respect to the allegations against covered employees.”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Turner v. Franklin
green
2 sentences2016Id. 2016Id. at 774 . ■ The emergency room- physician ordered a scrotal ultrasound in an effort to rule out a testicular torsion, a condition that is considered serious because the testicle will die if it is left untreated. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Turner v. State
green
1 sentence2015Id. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Henderson v. State
green
1 sentence2015In short, section 38.111 (and the Twelfth Court of Appeals’ interpretation of that statute) presents an “irrebutable presumption” (which the Supreme Court criticized in Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur, 414 U.S. 632, 648 (1974)) that Schlittler’s son must, at all times and in all respects, be protected from his own father. 27 Additionally, this Court intimated that the State’s interest in protecting children decreases with age.15 Henderson, 962 S.W.2d at 562-63 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Sparks v. State
green
1 sentence2014Buckley, 46 S.W.3d at 337 (citing Sparks v. State, 820 S.W.2d 924 , 927–30 (Tex. App.—Austin 1991, no pet.)). 6 White’s answer was in response to a question by Murray, not the State. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Buckley v. State
green
1 sentence2014Buckley, 46 S.W.3d at 337 (citing Sparks v. State, 820 S.W.2d 924 , 927–30 (Tex. App.—Austin 1991, no pet.)). 6 White’s answer was in response to a question by Murray, not the State. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Long v. State
red
1 sentence1990The Court held it fundamentally unfair to impose upon the accused, as in many instances the statute would, the “Hobson’s choice” between relinquishing his right to call the child victim to the stand in an effort to test his credibility, and invoking that right but thereby risking the wrath of the factfinder for subjecting the child to the very trauma the statute is supposed to obviate. 742 S.W.2d at 321 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.