Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2012–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kneeland v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'ngreen2 sentences2013See Kneeland, 850 F.2d at 228 (reviewing Tex. Att’y Gen. 2013See Kneeland, 850 F.2d at 228 (reviewing Tex. Att’y Gen. | 5 | 5 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Sujoy GUPTA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EAST TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY, Defendant-Appellee
green
2 sentences2018In Gupta , the Fifth Circuit created an exception to the exhaustion requirement for claims asserting retaliation for filing an EEOC complaint. 654 F.2d at 413 -14 . 2015Such is pursuant to the 18 holding in Gupta, wherein the Fifth Circuit created an exception to the exhaustion requirement for claims of retaliation over the filing of an EEOC charge. 654 F.2d 411 . | 2 | 2015–2018 |