first three Barker factors (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

first three Barker factors in Texas

7 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2012–2016 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (11)

CaseFollowedCited
Guajardo v. Stategreen
texapp · 1999 · cited in 3 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2012–2015
2 sentences

2015See Russell, 90 S.W.3d at 8745 (finding no speedy trial violation when first three factors weighed in appellant’s favor and presumptive prejudice was rebutted by failure to demonstrate any prejudice); Guajardo, 999 S.W.2d at 571 (same).

2014See Russell, 90 S.W.3d at 874[ 5 ] (finding no speedy trial violation when first three factors weighed in appellant’s favor and presumptive prejudice was rebutted by failure to demonstrate any prejudice); Guajardo, 999 S.W.2d at 571 (same).

33
Shaw v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 2003 · cited in 3 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2014–2015
2 sentences

2015The court reiterated that “the length of delay may be so excessive that it ‘presumptively compromises the reliability of a trial in ways that neither party can prove or identify.’ ” Id. at 812 (quoting Shaw v. State, 117 S.W.3d 883, 890 (Tex.Crim.App.2003) (citing Doggett, 505 U.S. at 655 , 112 S.Ct. 2686 )).

2014The court reiterated that “the length of delay may be so excessive that it ‘presumptively compromises the reliability of a trial in ways that neither party can prove or identify.’” Id. at 812 (quoting Shaw v. State, 117 S.W.3d 883, 890 (Tex. Crim.

33
United States v. Bishopgreen
ca5 · 2010 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
2 sentences

2015United States v. Reagan, 725 F.3d 471, 487 (5th Cir. 2013); United States v. Bishop, 629 F.3d 462, 465 (5th Cir. 2010); Gonzales, 435 S.W.3d at 812 .

2015United States v. Reagan, 725 F.3d 471, 487 (5th Cir. 2013); United States v. Bishop, 629 F.3d 462, 465 (5th Cir. 2010); Gonzales, 435 S.W.3d at 812 .

22
United States v. Darren Reagangreen
ca5 · 2013 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
2 sentences

2015United States v. Reagan, 725 F.3d 471, 487 (5th Cir. 2013); United States v. Bishop, 629 F.3d 462, 465 (5th Cir. 2010); Gonzales, 435 S.W.3d at 812 .

2015United States v. Reagan, 725 F.3d 471, 487 (5th Cir. 2013); United States v. Bishop, 629 F.3d 462, 465 (5th Cir. 2010); Gonzales, 435 S.W.3d at 812 .

22
Doggett v. United Statesgreen
scotus · 1992 · cited in 3 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2014–2016
2 sentences

2016See, e.g., Doggett, 505 U.S, at 657-58, 112 S.Ct. 2686 ; United States v. Molina-Solorio, 577 F.3d 300, 305-07 (5th Cir.2009); United States v. Cardona, 302 F.3d 494, 498-99 (5th Cir.2002) (per curiam); United States v. Bergfeld, 280 F.3d 486, 489-90 (5th Cir.2002); Gonzales , 435 S.W.3d at.809-12; Zamorano, 84 S.W.3d at 649-52 ; State v. Wei, 44. 7 S.W.3d 549, 554-55 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2014, pet. ref’d); Orand v. State, 254 S.W.3d 560, 570-71 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2008, pet. ref’d).

2015The court reiterated that “the length of delay may be so excessive that it ‘presumptively compromises the reliability of a trial in ways that neither party can prove or identify.’ ” Id. at 812 (quoting Shaw v. State, 117 S.W.3d 883, 890 (Tex.Crim.App.2003) (citing Doggett, 505 U.S. at 655 , 112 S.Ct. 2686 )).

13
United States v. Bergfeldgreen
ca5 · 2002 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016See, e.g., Doggett, 505 U.S, at 657-58, 112 S.Ct. 2686 ; United States v. Molina-Solorio, 577 F.3d 300, 305-07 (5th Cir.2009); United States v. Cardona, 302 F.3d 494, 498-99 (5th Cir.2002) (per curiam); United States v. Bergfeld, 280 F.3d 486, 489-90 (5th Cir.2002); Gonzales , 435 S.W.3d at.809-12; Zamorano, 84 S.W.3d at 649-52 ; State v. Wei, 44. 7 S.W.3d 549, 554-55 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2014, pet. ref’d); Orand v. State, 254 S.W.3d 560, 570-71 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2008, pet. ref’d).

11
Hawkins v. Director of Revenuegreen
moctapp · 1999 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016See, e.g., Doggett, 505 U.S, at 657-58, 112 S.Ct. 2686 ; United States v. Molina-Solorio, 577 F.3d 300, 305-07 (5th Cir.2009); United States v. Cardona, 302 F.3d 494, 498-99 (5th Cir.2002) (per curiam); United States v. Bergfeld, 280 F.3d 486, 489-90 (5th Cir.2002); Gonzales , 435 S.W.3d at.809-12; Zamorano, 84 S.W.3d at 649-52 ; State v. Wei, 44. 7 S.W.3d 549, 554-55 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2014, pet. ref’d); Orand v. State, 254 S.W.3d 560, 570-71 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2008, pet. ref’d).

11
Orand v. Stategreen
texapp · 2008 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016See, e.g., Doggett, 505 U.S, at 657-58, 112 S.Ct. 2686 ; United States v. Molina-Solorio, 577 F.3d 300, 305-07 (5th Cir.2009); United States v. Cardona, 302 F.3d 494, 498-99 (5th Cir.2002) (per curiam); United States v. Bergfeld, 280 F.3d 486, 489-90 (5th Cir.2002); Gonzales , 435 S.W.3d at.809-12; Zamorano, 84 S.W.3d at 649-52 ; State v. Wei, 44. 7 S.W.3d 549, 554-55 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2014, pet. ref’d); Orand v. State, 254 S.W.3d 560, 570-71 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2008, pet. ref’d).

11
United States v. Juan Alberto Cardona, Also Known as Juanchogreen
ca5 · 2002 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016See, e.g., Doggett, 505 U.S, at 657-58, 112 S.Ct. 2686 ; United States v. Molina-Solorio, 577 F.3d 300, 305-07 (5th Cir.2009); United States v. Cardona, 302 F.3d 494, 498-99 (5th Cir.2002) (per curiam); United States v. Bergfeld, 280 F.3d 486, 489-90 (5th Cir.2002); Gonzales , 435 S.W.3d at.809-12; Zamorano, 84 S.W.3d at 649-52 ; State v. Wei, 44. 7 S.W.3d 549, 554-55 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2014, pet. ref’d); Orand v. State, 254 S.W.3d 560, 570-71 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2008, pet. ref’d).

11
United States v. Molina-Soloriogreen
ca5 · 2009 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016See, e.g., Doggett, 505 U.S, at 657-58, 112 S.Ct. 2686 ; United States v. Molina-Solorio, 577 F.3d 300, 305-07 (5th Cir.2009); United States v. Cardona, 302 F.3d 494, 498-99 (5th Cir.2002) (per curiam); United States v. Bergfeld, 280 F.3d 486, 489-90 (5th Cir.2002); Gonzales , 435 S.W.3d at.809-12; Zamorano, 84 S.W.3d at 649-52 ; State v. Wei, 44. 7 S.W.3d 549, 554-55 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2014, pet. ref’d); Orand v. State, 254 S.W.3d 560, 570-71 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2008, pet. ref’d).

11
Russell v. Stategreen
texapp · 2003 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012
1 sentence

2012See Russell, 90 S.W.3d at 874 (finding no speedy trial violation when first three factors weighed in appellant’s favor and -9- 04-11-00405-CR presumptive prejudice was rebutted by failure to demonstrate any prejudice); Guajardo, 999 S.W.2d at 571 (same).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Gonzales v. State green
texcrimapp · 2014
2 sentences

2015United States v. Reagan, 725 F.3d 471, 487 (5th Cir. 2013); United States v. Bishop, 629 F.3d 462, 465 (5th Cir. 2010); Gonzales, 435 S.W.3d at 812 .

2015The court reiterated that “the length of delay may be so excessive that it ‘presumptively compromises the reliability of a trial in ways that neither party can prove or identify.’ ” Id. at 812 (quoting Shaw v. State, 117 S.W.3d 883, 890 (Tex.Crim.App.2003) (citing Doggett, 505 U.S. at 655 , 112 S.Ct. 2686 )).

52014–2015
Zamorano v. State green
texcrimapp · 2002
1 sentence

2016See, e.g., Doggett, 505 U.S, at 657-58, 112 S.Ct. 2686 ; United States v. Molina-Solorio, 577 F.3d 300, 305-07 (5th Cir.2009); United States v. Cardona, 302 F.3d 494, 498-99 (5th Cir.2002) (per curiam); United States v. Bergfeld, 280 F.3d 486, 489-90 (5th Cir.2002); Gonzales , 435 S.W.3d at.809-12; Zamorano, 84 S.W.3d at 649-52 ; State v. Wei, 44. 7 S.W.3d 549, 554-55 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2014, pet. ref’d); Orand v. State, 254 S.W.3d 560, 570-71 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2008, pet. ref’d).

12016–2016

Statutes the citing opinions construe

TX § Tex. Penal Code § 49.01 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

NM 11 (2000–2022) GA 9 (2009–2020) TX 7 (2012–2016) AL 7 (1981–2016) FL 3 (1982–1989) CA 3 (1990–2010) MS 3 (1995–2021) UT 2 (2022–2025) OH 2 (2024–2025) MI 2 (2022–2022)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check