Account information only. It is never shown to the AI client you connect, and it is kept apart from your research — which is not logged at all.
Your token is the key to the MCP: claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode take it in the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. It is also in your welcome email. Install instructions.
No token yet. One token per address, shown once and mailed to you with setup steps — claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode need it in the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. Install instructions.
Your MCP token. Anyone holding it can search on your subscription, so keep it off shared screens.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode, which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
The dedicated fast index: searches run on a machine nobody else queues for, with full-text highlighted excerpts. Higher MCP limits, and semantic search when it lands.
See ProThank you.
Manage billingDelete my account: email [email protected] and it is done by hand, usually the same day. (Self-serve deletion is not built yet.)
Free, and it takes a minute. Registered visitors skip the Cloudflare checks, and your MCP token for Claude or ChatGPT is issued at the end of this.
Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
Here is your MCP token. It is shown once — it is also in the welcome email we just sent you, with setup steps.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode, which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
That address already had a token, so we did not issue a second one — two live credentials for one mailbox is how people end up with a working laptop and a broken office machine. Your connector URL is in your inbox under “Your Syfert legal research connector URL”; if it is gone, call 904-383-7448.
7 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2008–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
W.L. Lindemann Operating Co. v. Strangegreen2 sentences2015Lindeman n Operating Co., Inc. v. Strange, 256 S.W.3d 766, 775 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2008, pet. denied) (noting,' but not applying, the St. 2015Lindemann Operating Co., Inc. v. Strange, 256 S.W.3d 766, 775 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2008, pet. denied) (noting, but not applying, the St. | 2 | 2 |
Long v. Stategreen2 sentences2008See Long, 800 S.W.2d at 548 . 2008See Long , 800 S.W.2d at 548 . | 2 | 2 |
Bocquet v. Herringgreen1 sentence2022Relying on Bocquet v. Herring, Victoria argues that an award of attorney’s fees is reviewed under the abuse-of-discretion standard. 972 S.W.2d 19, 20 (Tex. 1998). | 1 | 1 |
McLendon v. Stategreen1 sentence2014See McLendon v. State, 167 S.W.3d 503, 510 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2005). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Canal Insurance Co. v. Hopkins
green
1 sentence2009Co. v. Hopkins, 238 S.W.3d 549 , 567 n.6 (Tex. App.–Tyler 2007, pet. denied). 3 To the extent that Joseph presents additional grounds in support of this issue, these grounds were never asserted in the trial court in support of Joseph’s motion for disqualification. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.