Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Bagleyred2 sentences2008Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963); see United States v. Bagley , 473 U.S. 667 , 105 S.Ct. 3375 , 87 L.Ed.2d 481 (1985) ( Brady extends to evidence which impeaches the credibility of a witness). 2008Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963); see United States v. Bagley , 473 U.S. 667 , 105 S.Ct. 3375 , 87 L.Ed.2d 481 (1985) ( Brady extends to evidence which impeaches the credibility of a witness). | 4 | 4 |
Keeter v. Stategreen2 sentences2015Keeter v. State, 74 S.W.3d at 37 . 2015Keeter v. State, 74 S.W.3d at 37 . | 2 | 6 |
Carsner v. Stategreen2 sentences2015In addition, the legal ramifications from the newly discovered evidence make it more than likely that a different outcome could have resulted in another trial, thus meeting the third and fourth prong of the Keeter test. 2 2 The court of appeals assumed that Parker established the first two prongs under Carsner v. State, PD-0153-14, 2014 WL 4722762, at *2 (Tex. Crim. 2015In addition, the legal ramifications from the newly discovered evidence make it more than likely that a different outcome could have resulted in another trial, thus meeting the third and fourth prong of the Keeter test. 2 2 The court of appeals assumed that Parker established the first two prongs under Carsner v. State, PD-0153-14, 2014 WL 4722762, at *2 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Brady v. Maryland
green
2 sentences2008Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963); see United States v. Bagley , 473 U.S. 667 , 105 S.Ct. 3375 , 87 L.Ed.2d 481 (1985) ( Brady extends to evidence which impeaches the credibility of a witness). 2008Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963); see United States v. Bagley , 473 U.S. 667 , 105 S.Ct. 3375 , 87 L.Ed.2d 481 (1985) ( Brady extends to evidence which impeaches the credibility of a witness). | 4 | 2001–2008 |
Ex Parte Richardson
green
2 sentences2008Id. 2003Id. | 3 | 2003–2008 |