Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1965–2021 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
HCBeck, Ltd. v. Ricegreen2 sentences2021An employee benefits from workers’ compensation insurance benefits “because it saves the time and litigation expense inherent in proving fault in a common law tort claim.” Id. 2021An employee benefits from workers’ compensation insurance because it saves the time and litigation expense inherent in proving fault in a common law tort claim.” HCBeck, Ltd. v. Rice, 284 S.W.3d 349, 350 (Tex. 2009). | 1 | 2 |
Grant Thornton LLP v. Prospect High Income Fundgreen1 sentence2015See Grant Thornton LLP v. Prospect High Income Fund, 314 S.W.3d 913, 919-20 (Tex. 2010) (citing Restatement 2nd of Torts, § 552 (1977), which addresses liability for negligent misrepresentation under the common law). | 1 | 1 |
Franka v. Velasquezgreen2 sentences2011Stinson’s Suit in Federal Court was Brought “Under this Chapter” Subsections (a), (e), (e), and (f) of the election-of-remedies provision reference suits that are filed or brought “under this chapter.” This phrase has the same meaning throughout the statute, see Fran-jea v. Velasquez, 332 S.W.3d 367, 379 (Tex. 2011), and it includes any suit in which the plaintiff alleges a common law tort claim, regardless of whether the TTCA waives immunity for the claim, id. at 369 . 2011Stinson’s Suit in Federal Court was Brought “Under this Chapter” Subsections (a), (e), (e), and (f) of the election-of-remedies provision reference suits that are filed or brought “under this chapter.” This phrase has the same meaning throughout the statute, see Fran-jea v. Velasquez, 332 S.W.3d 367, 379 (Tex. 2011), and it includes any suit in which the plaintiff alleges a common law tort claim, regardless of whether the TTCA waives immunity for the claim, id. at 369 . | 1 | 1 |
Stinnett v. Williamson County Sheriff's Departmentgreen1 sentence1998See Stinnett, 858 S.W.2d at 574 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Stephen Fontenot v. Tiffany Stinson
green
1 sentence2020A suit brought “under this chapter” includes any suit in which a plaintiff alleges a common law tort claim, regardless of whether the TTCA waives immunity for that claim. 41 Fontenot, 369 S.W.3d at 272–73 (internal quotations omitted). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Green v. Evans
green
2 sentences1965Green v. Evans (Tex.Civ.App.), 362 S.W.2d 377 . 1965Green v. Evans (Tex.Civ.App.), 362 S.W.2d 377 . | 1 | 1965–1965 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.