Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2017–2025 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
R.K. v. Ramirez
green
2 sentences2025As the Texas Supreme Court has explained, it is not enough that there are allegations in the lawsuit for which a condition of the nonparty patient may be relevant; rather, “[t]he scope of the exception should be tied in a meaningful way to the legal consequences of the claim or defense.” Id. at 842 . 18. 2025As the Texas Supreme Court has explained, it is not enough that there are allegations in the lawsuit for which a condition of the nonparty patient may be relevant—rather, “[t]he scope of the exception should be tied in a meaningful way to the legal consequences of the claim or defense.” Id. at 842 . 13. | 7 | 2017–2025 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.