Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2011–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Barshop v. Medina County Underground Water Conservation Districtgreen2 sentences2022Instead, according to Ms. Simmons, “[T]he standing analysis for a challenge to a statute is a separate, two prong standard: To challenge a statute a plaintiff must both [1] suffer some actual or threatened restriction under the statute and [2] contend that the statute unconstitutionally restricts the plaintiff’s rights.” In support of that contention, she cites Patel, 469 S.W.3d at 77 , and Barshop v. Medina County Underground Water Conservation District, 925 S.W.2d 618, 626 (Tex. 1996). 2022Instead, according to Ms. Simmons, “[T]he standing analysis for a challenge to a statute is a separate, two prong standard: To challenge a statute a plaintiff must both [1] suffer some actual or threatened restriction under the statute and [2] contend that the statute unconstitutionally restricts the plaintiff’s rights.” In support of that contention, she cites Patel, 469 S.W.3d at 77 , and Barshop v. Medina County Underground Water Conservation District, 925 S.W.2d 618, 626 (Tex. 1996). | 1 | 1 |
G & H TOWING CO. v. Mageegreen1 sentence2021See G & H Towing Co. v. Magee, 347 S.W.3d 293, 297 (Tex. 2011) (“Granting a summary judgment on a claim not addressed in the summary judgment motion therefore is, as a general rule, reversible error.”). | 1 | 1 |
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Trinh Pham, Katherine Crawford & Gary Blockgreen2 sentences2016See Pham, 449 S.W.3d at 236 ; Auten, 209 S.W.3d at 702 . 2016See Pham, 449 S.W.3d at 236 ; Auten, 209 S.W.3d at 702 . | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Otto Melvin Ramirez, Also Known as Arcadio Canul Vasquezgreen1 sentence2015Lujan’s plea of nolo contendere, resulting in deferred adjudication, is counted as a conviction for the purposes of federal immigration law. 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(48)(A); U.S. v. Ramirez, 367 F.3d 274, 277 (5th Cir. 2004)(deferred adjudication is included as a conviction). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Ross
green
2 sentences2011State v. Ross , 32 S.W.3d at 855-66 . 2011State v. Ross, 32 S.W.3d at 855-66 . | 3 | 2011–2011 |
Ashish Patel, Anverali Satani, Nazira Momin, Minaz Chamadia, and Vijay Lakshmi Yogi v. Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation
green
2 sentences2022Instead, according to Ms. Simmons, “[T]he standing analysis for a challenge to a statute is a separate, two prong standard: To challenge a statute a plaintiff must both [1] suffer some actual or threatened restriction under the statute and [2] contend that the statute unconstitutionally restricts the plaintiff’s rights.” In support of that contention, she cites Patel, 469 S.W.3d at 77 , and Barshop v. Medina County Underground Water Conservation District, 925 S.W.2d 618, 626 (Tex. 1996). 2022Instead, according to Ms. Simmons, “[T]he standing analysis for a challenge to a statute is a separate, two prong standard: To challenge a statute a plaintiff must both [1] suffer some actual or threatened restriction under the statute and [2] contend that the statute unconstitutionally restricts the plaintiff’s rights.” In support of that contention, she cites Patel, 469 S.W.3d at 77 , and Barshop v. Medina County Underground Water Conservation District, 925 S.W.2d 618, 626 (Tex. 1996). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Auten v. DJ Clark, Inc.
green
2 sentences2016See Pham, 449 S.W.3d at 236 ; Auten, 209 S.W.3d at 702 . 2016See Pham, 449 S.W.3d at 236 ; Auten, 209 S.W.3d at 702 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.