probationary violation (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

probationary violation in Texas

7 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1978–2013 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Davenport v. Stateyellow
texcrimapp · 1978 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1982–1985
2 sentences

1985See Davenport v. State, 574 S.W.2d 73 (Tex.Crim.App.1978); Johnson v. State, 633 S.W.2d 687 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 1982, pet. ref’d.).

1982Leos v. State, No. 07-81-0072-CR (Tex.App.— Amarillo, April 12, 1982, not yet reported); and Davenport v. State, 574 S.W.2d 73, 74-75 (Tex.Cr.App.1978) (en banc).

22
Stanfield v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 1979 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1980–1980
2 sentences

1980See Stanfield v. State, 588 S.W.2d 945 (Tex.Cr.App.1979) (Dissenting Opinion).

1980See Stanfield v. State, 588 S.W.2d 945 (Tex.Cr.App.1979) (Dissenting Opinion). *724 I believe the principle of Wester, Wallace and Furrh was violated.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
Ex Parte Byrd green
texcrimapp · 1988
1 sentence

2013Id.

12013–2013
Evan's World Travel, Inc. v. Adams green
texapp · 1998
1 sentence

2000In Evan's World Travel, Inc., 978 S.W.2d at 229-230 , the employment contract included a provision that allowed the employer to terminate the term of employment for "any reason.” The contract also included a probationary clause which allowed the employer to terminate the employee without cause for the first ninety (90) days.

12000–2000
Johnson v. State green
texapp · 1982
1 sentence

1985See Davenport v. State, 574 S.W.2d 73 (Tex.Crim.App.1978); Johnson v. State, 633 S.W.2d 687 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 1982, pet. ref’d.).

11985–1985
Wright v. State green
texcrimapp · 1982
1 sentence

1983This court relied upon Wright v. State, 640 S.W.2d 265 (Tex.Cr.App.1982), and Rogers v. State, 640 S.W.2d 248 (Tex.Cr.App.1982) (On State’s Motion for Rehearing) (en banc), in rendering its opinion on original submission.

11983–1983
Rogers v. State green
texcrimapp · 1982
1 sentence

1983This court relied upon Wright v. State, 640 S.W.2d 265 (Tex.Cr.App.1982), and Rogers v. State, 640 S.W.2d 248 (Tex.Cr.App.1982) (On State’s Motion for Rehearing) (en banc), in rendering its opinion on original submission.

11983–1983
Gagnon v. Scarpelli red
scotus · 1973
2 sentences

1978Gag-non v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778 , 93 S.Ct. 1756 , 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973).

1978Gag-non v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778 , 93 S.Ct. 1756 , 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973).

11978–1978

Where else courts name it

TX 7 (1978–2013) CA 6 (1967–2020) VA 4 (2005–2020) GA 3 (1976–1979) NC 2 (2022–2022) MA 2 (2002–2003) MT 2 (1987–2021) MD 2 (1990–2000) FL 2 (2009–2012)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check