Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2011–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Alexander v. Stategreen2 sentences2021“If evidence is in the record that rebuts the presumption of harm, it should be considered, whether presented by the State or the defense.” Bokemeyer, 355 S.W.3d at 203 (citing Alexander v. State, 919 S.W.2d 756, 767 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 1996, no pet.)). 2015“If evidence is in the record that rebuts the presumption of harm, it should be considered, whether presented by the State or the defense.” Alexander v. State, 919 S.W.2d 756, 767 (Tex. App.— Texarkana 1996, no pet.). | 4 | 4 |
Abdygapparova v. Stategreen1 sentence2014We conclude, therefore, that Landry has not met his burden of demonstrating that the trial court arbitrarily failed to consider the full range of punishment. 11 We also find nothing in the record to establish that the trial judge was biased or prejudiced or otherwise failed to remain detached and neutral during the final revocation hearing. “[T]he terms ‘bias’ and ‘prejudice’ do not encompass all unfavorable rulings towards an individual, or [his] case[.]” Abdygapparova v. State, 243 S.W.3d 191, 198 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2007, pet. ref’d). | 1 | 1 |
Gamboa v. Stategreen1 sentence2013See Gamboa, 296 S.W.3d at 580 . | 1 | 1 |
Strickland v. Washingtongreen2 sentences2011See Strickland , 466 U.S. at 689 , 104 S. Ct. at 2065 ; Thompson , 9 S.W.3d at 813 . 2011See Strickland , 466 U.S. at 689 , 104 S. Ct. at 2065 ; Thompson , 9 S.W.3d at 813 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Brad Lyle Bokemeyer v. State
green
1 sentence2021“If evidence is in the record that rebuts the presumption of harm, it should be considered, whether presented by the State or the defense.” Bokemeyer, 355 S.W.3d at 203 (citing Alexander v. State, 919 S.W.2d 756, 767 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 1996, no pet.)). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Thompson v. State
green
1 sentence2011See Strickland , 466 U.S. at 689 , 104 S. Ct. at 2065 ; Thompson , 9 S.W.3d at 813 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.