requested issue instruction (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

requested issue instruction in Texas

7 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1918–2001 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
Gunn Buick, Inc. v. Rosanogreen
texapp · 1995 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001
1 sentence

2001Gunn Buick, Inc. v. Rosano, 907 S.W.2d 628, 632 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1995, no writ).

11
Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.green
tex · 1985 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995
2 sentences

1995"The test for abuse of discretion is not whether, in the opinion of the reviewing court, the facts present an appropriate case for the trial court's action." Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc., 701 S.W.2d 238, 241 (Tex.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1159 , 106 S.Ct. 2279 , 90 L.Ed.2d 721 (1986); see Smithson v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 665 S.W.2d 439, 443 (Tex.1984).

1995“The test for abuse of discretion is not whether, in the opinion of the reviewing court, the facts present an appropriate case for the trial court’s action.” Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc., 701 S.W.2d 238, 241 (Tex.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1159 , 106 S.Ct. 2279 , 90 L.Ed.2d 721 (1986); see Smithson v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 665 S.W.2d 439, 443 (Tex.1984).

11
Smithson v. Cessna Aircraft Co.green
tex · 1984 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995
2 sentences

1995"The test for abuse of discretion is not whether, in the opinion of the reviewing court, the facts present an appropriate case for the trial court's action." Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc., 701 S.W.2d 238, 241 (Tex.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1159 , 106 S.Ct. 2279 , 90 L.Ed.2d 721 (1986); see Smithson v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 665 S.W.2d 439, 443 (Tex.1984).

1995“The test for abuse of discretion is not whether, in the opinion of the reviewing court, the facts present an appropriate case for the trial court’s action.” Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc., 701 S.W.2d 238, 241 (Tex.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1159 , 106 S.Ct. 2279 , 90 L.Ed.2d 721 (1986); see Smithson v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 665 S.W.2d 439, 443 (Tex.1984).

11
Brown v. Goldsteingreen
tex · 1985 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1991–1991
1 sentence

1991Brown v. Goldstein, 685 S.W.2d 640, 641 (Tex.1985); Southwestern Bell Tel.

11
Gold Medal Farms, Inc. v. Rutland County Co-Operative Creamery, Inc.green
nyappdiv · 1959 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987
1 sentence

1987See Gold Medal Farms, Inc., 195 N.Y.S.2d at 185 ; Restatement (Second) of Torts § 766, comment i. Points of Error 27 through 30, and 35 are overruled.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (13)

CaseCitedYears
Aquamarine Operators, Inc. v. Downer green
scotus · 1986
2 sentences

1995“The test for abuse of discretion is not whether, in the opinion of the reviewing court, the facts present an appropriate case for the trial court’s action.” Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc., 701 S.W.2d 238, 241 (Tex.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1159 , 106 S.Ct. 2279 , 90 L.Ed.2d 721 (1986); see Smithson v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 665 S.W.2d 439, 443 (Tex.1984).

1995“The test for abuse of discretion is not whether, in the opinion of the reviewing court, the facts present an appropriate case for the trial court’s action.” Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc., 701 S.W.2d 238, 241 (Tex.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1159 , 106 S.Ct. 2279 , 90 L.Ed.2d 721 (1986); see Smithson v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 665 S.W.2d 439, 443 (Tex.1984).

11995–1995
Lyles v. TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INSURANCE ASSOCIATION green
texapp · 1966
1 sentence

1968Ass’n, Tex.Civ.App., 405 S.W.2d 725 , writ ref., n. r. e. In Hodges, Special Issues Submission in Texas, at p. 154, it is said: “A requested issue or instruction in proper form will not serve to point out a defect in a submitted issue, a definition, or in the charge as a whole, as objection is the prescribed mode for presenting such a complaint.” On the basis of those authorities we are compelled to hold that appellants here did not comply with the requirements of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure in preserving the error, if any, of the trial court in submitting the definition as to the legal

11968–1968
Marion County v. Sparks neutral
texapp · 1938
1 sentence

1963De Las Fuentes v. Macdonell, supra; Sharrock v. Ritter, Tex.Civ.App., 45 S.W. 156 ; Freedman v. Bonner, Tex.Civ.App., 40 S.W. 47 ; Marion County v. Sparks, Tex.Civ.App., 112 S.W.2d 798 ; Walker v. Maynard, Tex.Civ.App., 31 S.W.2d 168 (171).

11963–1963
Walker v. Maynard green
texapp · 1930
1 sentence

1963De Las Fuentes v. Macdonell, supra; Sharrock v. Ritter, Tex.Civ.App., 45 S.W. 156 ; Freedman v. Bonner, Tex.Civ.App., 40 S.W. 47 ; Marion County v. Sparks, Tex.Civ.App., 112 S.W.2d 798 ; Walker v. Maynard, Tex.Civ.App., 31 S.W.2d 168 (171).

11963–1963
Schunior v. Russell green
tex · 1892
2 sentences

1918Bolton v. Lann, 16 Tex. 96 , see page 112, Hubert v. Bartlett’s Heirs, 9 Tex. 97, 98 ; Anderson v. Stamps, 19 Tex. 460 ; Richardson v. Powell, 83 Tex. 588 , 19 S. W. 262 ; Schunior v. Russell, 83 Tex. 83 , 18 S. W. 484 ; Ayers v. Harris, 77 Tex. 108 , 13 S. W. 768 ; Boydston v. Sumpter, 78 Tex. 402 , 14 S. W. 996 ; Schaeffer v. Berry, 62 Tex. 705 ; Davis v. Smith, 61 Tex. 18 .

1918Bolton v. Lann, 16 Tex. 96 , see page 112, Hubert v. Bartlett’s Heirs, 9 Tex. 97, 98 ; Anderson v. Stamps, 19 Tex. 460 ; Richardson v. Powell, 83 Tex. 588 , 19 S. W. 262 ; Schunior v. Russell, 83 Tex. 83 , 18 S. W. 484 ; Ayers v. Harris, 77 Tex. 108 , 13 S. W. 768 ; Boydston v. Sumpter, 78 Tex. 402 , 14 S. W. 996 ; Schaeffer v. Berry, 62 Tex. 705 ; Davis v. Smith, 61 Tex. 18 .

11918–1918
Richardson v. Powell green
tex · 1892
2 sentences

1918Bolton v. Lann, 16 Tex. 96 , see page 112, Hubert v. Bartlett’s Heirs, 9 Tex. 97, 98 ; Anderson v. Stamps, 19 Tex. 460 ; Richardson v. Powell, 83 Tex. 588 , 19 S. W. 262 ; Schunior v. Russell, 83 Tex. 83 , 18 S. W. 484 ; Ayers v. Harris, 77 Tex. 108 , 13 S. W. 768 ; Boydston v. Sumpter, 78 Tex. 402 , 14 S. W. 996 ; Schaeffer v. Berry, 62 Tex. 705 ; Davis v. Smith, 61 Tex. 18 .

1918Bolton v. Lann, 16 Tex. 96 , see page 112, Hubert v. Bartlett’s Heirs, 9 Tex. 97, 98 ; Anderson v. Stamps, 19 Tex. 460 ; Richardson v. Powell, 83 Tex. 588 , 19 S. W. 262 ; Schunior v. Russell, 83 Tex. 83 , 18 S. W. 484 ; Ayers v. Harris, 77 Tex. 108 , 13 S. W. 768 ; Boydston v. Sumpter, 78 Tex. 402 , 14 S. W. 996 ; Schaeffer v. Berry, 62 Tex. 705 ; Davis v. Smith, 61 Tex. 18 .

11918–1918
Hubert v. Bartlett's Heirs green
tex · 1852
1 sentence

1918Bolton v. Lann, 16 Tex. 96 , see page 112, Hubert v. Bartlett’s Heirs, 9 Tex. 97, 98 ; Anderson v. Stamps, 19 Tex. 460 ; Richardson v. Powell, 83 Tex. 588 , 19 S. W. 262 ; Schunior v. Russell, 83 Tex. 83 , 18 S. W. 484 ; Ayers v. Harris, 77 Tex. 108 , 13 S. W. 768 ; Boydston v. Sumpter, 78 Tex. 402 , 14 S. W. 996 ; Schaeffer v. Berry, 62 Tex. 705 ; Davis v. Smith, 61 Tex. 18 .

11918–1918
Bolton v. Lann green
tex · 1856
1 sentence

1918Bolton v. Lann, 16 Tex. 96 , see page 112, Hubert v. Bartlett’s Heirs, 9 Tex. 97, 98 ; Anderson v. Stamps, 19 Tex. 460 ; Richardson v. Powell, 83 Tex. 588 , 19 S. W. 262 ; Schunior v. Russell, 83 Tex. 83 , 18 S. W. 484 ; Ayers v. Harris, 77 Tex. 108 , 13 S. W. 768 ; Boydston v. Sumpter, 78 Tex. 402 , 14 S. W. 996 ; Schaeffer v. Berry, 62 Tex. 705 ; Davis v. Smith, 61 Tex. 18 .

11918–1918
Anderson v. Stamps neutral
tex · 1857
1 sentence

1918Bolton v. Lann, 16 Tex. 96 , see page 112, Hubert v. Bartlett’s Heirs, 9 Tex. 97, 98 ; Anderson v. Stamps, 19 Tex. 460 ; Richardson v. Powell, 83 Tex. 588 , 19 S. W. 262 ; Schunior v. Russell, 83 Tex. 83 , 18 S. W. 484 ; Ayers v. Harris, 77 Tex. 108 , 13 S. W. 768 ; Boydston v. Sumpter, 78 Tex. 402 , 14 S. W. 996 ; Schaeffer v. Berry, 62 Tex. 705 ; Davis v. Smith, 61 Tex. 18 .

11918–1918
Davis v. Smith green
tex · 1884
1 sentence

1918Bolton v. Lann, 16 Tex. 96 , see page 112, Hubert v. Bartlett’s Heirs, 9 Tex. 97, 98 ; Anderson v. Stamps, 19 Tex. 460 ; Richardson v. Powell, 83 Tex. 588 , 19 S. W. 262 ; Schunior v. Russell, 83 Tex. 83 , 18 S. W. 484 ; Ayers v. Harris, 77 Tex. 108 , 13 S. W. 768 ; Boydston v. Sumpter, 78 Tex. 402 , 14 S. W. 996 ; Schaeffer v. Berry, 62 Tex. 705 ; Davis v. Smith, 61 Tex. 18 .

11918–1918
Schaeffer v. Berry neutral
tex · 1884
1 sentence

1918Bolton v. Lann, 16 Tex. 96 , see page 112, Hubert v. Bartlett’s Heirs, 9 Tex. 97, 98 ; Anderson v. Stamps, 19 Tex. 460 ; Richardson v. Powell, 83 Tex. 588 , 19 S. W. 262 ; Schunior v. Russell, 83 Tex. 83 , 18 S. W. 484 ; Ayers v. Harris, 77 Tex. 108 , 13 S. W. 768 ; Boydston v. Sumpter, 78 Tex. 402 , 14 S. W. 996 ; Schaeffer v. Berry, 62 Tex. 705 ; Davis v. Smith, 61 Tex. 18 .

11918–1918
Ayers v. Harris green
tex · 1890
2 sentences

1918Bolton v. Lann, 16 Tex. 96 , see page 112, Hubert v. Bartlett’s Heirs, 9 Tex. 97, 98 ; Anderson v. Stamps, 19 Tex. 460 ; Richardson v. Powell, 83 Tex. 588 , 19 S. W. 262 ; Schunior v. Russell, 83 Tex. 83 , 18 S. W. 484 ; Ayers v. Harris, 77 Tex. 108 , 13 S. W. 768 ; Boydston v. Sumpter, 78 Tex. 402 , 14 S. W. 996 ; Schaeffer v. Berry, 62 Tex. 705 ; Davis v. Smith, 61 Tex. 18 .

1918Bolton v. Lann, 16 Tex. 96 , see page 112, Hubert v. Bartlett’s Heirs, 9 Tex. 97, 98 ; Anderson v. Stamps, 19 Tex. 460 ; Richardson v. Powell, 83 Tex. 588 , 19 S. W. 262 ; Schunior v. Russell, 83 Tex. 83 , 18 S. W. 484 ; Ayers v. Harris, 77 Tex. 108 , 13 S. W. 768 ; Boydston v. Sumpter, 78 Tex. 402 , 14 S. W. 996 ; Schaeffer v. Berry, 62 Tex. 705 ; Davis v. Smith, 61 Tex. 18 .

11918–1918
Boydston v. Sumpter neutral
tex · 1890
2 sentences

1918Bolton v. Lann, 16 Tex. 96 , see page 112, Hubert v. Bartlett’s Heirs, 9 Tex. 97, 98 ; Anderson v. Stamps, 19 Tex. 460 ; Richardson v. Powell, 83 Tex. 588 , 19 S. W. 262 ; Schunior v. Russell, 83 Tex. 83 , 18 S. W. 484 ; Ayers v. Harris, 77 Tex. 108 , 13 S. W. 768 ; Boydston v. Sumpter, 78 Tex. 402 , 14 S. W. 996 ; Schaeffer v. Berry, 62 Tex. 705 ; Davis v. Smith, 61 Tex. 18 .

1918Bolton v. Lann, 16 Tex. 96 , see page 112, Hubert v. Bartlett’s Heirs, 9 Tex. 97, 98 ; Anderson v. Stamps, 19 Tex. 460 ; Richardson v. Powell, 83 Tex. 588 , 19 S. W. 262 ; Schunior v. Russell, 83 Tex. 83 , 18 S. W. 484 ; Ayers v. Harris, 77 Tex. 108 , 13 S. W. 768 ; Boydston v. Sumpter, 78 Tex. 402 , 14 S. W. 996 ; Schaeffer v. Berry, 62 Tex. 705 ; Davis v. Smith, 61 Tex. 18 .

11918–1918

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check