Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1966–2004 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
GTE Southwest, Inc. v. Brucegreen1 sentence2004See GTE Southwest, Inc. v. Bruce, 998 S.W.2d 605, 617-18 (Tex.1999) (intentional infliction of emotional distress in employment context); Wrenn v. G.A.T.X. | 1 | 1 |
Baptist Memorial Hospital System v. Sampsongreen1 sentence2002Sys. v. Sampson, 969 S.W.2d 945, 947 (Tex.1998). | 1 | 1 |
Parmlee v. Texas & New Orleans Railroad Companygreen1 sentence2000Co., 381 S.W.2d 90, 94 (Tex.Civ.App.—Tyler 1964, writ ref'd n.r.e.). | 1 | 1 |
Dieter v. Baker Service Tools, a Division of Baker International, Inc.green1 sentence1994Dieter v. Baker Service Tools, 739 S.W.2d 405, 407 (Tex.App. -Corpus Christi 1987, writ denied); Langley v. National Lead Co., 666 S.W.2d 343 (Tex.App.—El Paso 1984, no writ). *144 Walkovak, a mine maintenance supervisor for Sabine, attended the mining association meeting as a representative of his employer. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Gonzalez v. Ison-Newsome
green
1 sentence2001Because the court of appeals here determined that the defendants’ affidavits presented “mere legal conclusions” and did not meet the respon-deat superior test, it did not reach the question whether breach of various duties would defeat a properly established immunity defense. 68 S.W.3d at 5 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Langley v. National Lead Co.
green
1 sentence1994Dieter v. Baker Service Tools, 739 S.W.2d 405, 407 (Tex.App. -Corpus Christi 1987, writ denied); Langley v. National Lead Co., 666 S.W.2d 343 (Tex.App.—El Paso 1984, no writ). *144 Walkovak, a mine maintenance supervisor for Sabine, attended the mining association meeting as a representative of his employer. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Gunnells Sand Company v. Wilhite
green
1 sentence1968Rules 67, 277 and 279, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure; Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Pierce, 153 Tex. 527 , 271 S.W.2d 422, 424 ; Parr v. Pichinson, Tex.Civ.App., 370 S.W.2d 941 , wr. ref.; Gunnells Sand Company v. Wilhite, Tex. Civ.App., 389 S.W.2d 596 , wr. ref. n. r. e. Dr. Constant’s alleged liability in this suit is based on the doctrine of respon-deat superior, it being allegde and proved that at all relevant times Dr. Shields was acting as the salaried agent and employee of Dr. Constant under instructions given by the latter, and within the course of his said employment and agency. | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Parr v. Pichinson
green
1 sentence1968Rules 67, 277 and 279, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure; Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Pierce, 153 Tex. 527 , 271 S.W.2d 422, 424 ; Parr v. Pichinson, Tex.Civ.App., 370 S.W.2d 941 , wr. ref.; Gunnells Sand Company v. Wilhite, Tex. Civ.App., 389 S.W.2d 596 , wr. ref. n. r. e. Dr. Constant’s alleged liability in this suit is based on the doctrine of respon-deat superior, it being allegde and proved that at all relevant times Dr. Shields was acting as the salaried agent and employee of Dr. Constant under instructions given by the latter, and within the course of his said employment and agency. | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Pierce
green
2 sentences1968Rules 67, 277 and 279, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure; Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Pierce, 153 Tex. 527 , 271 S.W.2d 422, 424 ; Parr v. Pichinson, Tex.Civ.App., 370 S.W.2d 941 , wr. ref.; Gunnells Sand Company v. Wilhite, Tex. Civ.App., 389 S.W.2d 596 , wr. ref. n. r. e. Dr. Constant’s alleged liability in this suit is based on the doctrine of respon-deat superior, it being allegde and proved that at all relevant times Dr. Shields was acting as the salaried agent and employee of Dr. Constant under instructions given by the latter, and within the course of his said employment and agency. 1968Rules 67, 277 and 279, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure; Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Pierce, 153 Tex. 527 , 271 S.W.2d 422, 424 ; Parr v. Pichinson, Tex.Civ.App., 370 S.W.2d 941 , wr. ref.; Gunnells Sand Company v. Wilhite, Tex. Civ.App., 389 S.W.2d 596 , wr. ref. n. r. e. Dr. Constant’s alleged liability in this suit is based on the doctrine of respon-deat superior, it being allegde and proved that at all relevant times Dr. Shields was acting as the salaried agent and employee of Dr. Constant under instructions given by the latter, and within the course of his said employment and agency. | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Valdez v. Amaya
neutral
1 sentence1966In connection with appellant’s second point, concerning the failure of the city officers to summon medical aid for appellant for a period of several hours after the shooting, we quote from Valdez v. Amaya, Tex.Civ.App., 327 S.W.2d 708 , cited with evident approval in the Dancer case, as follows: “The City’s plea in abatement was based upon the contention that Manuel Amaya as City Marshal was exercising police power in making the arrest of Sabas Valdez and, therefore, the City could not be held liable for Amaya’s negligence under the doctrine of respon-deat superior, and further, that if the Ma | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.