Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 2000–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
in Re: William W. Adamsgreen1 sentence2026See In re Adams, 416 S.W.3d 556 (Tex. App.—Tyler 2013, orig proceeding) (mem. op.) (granting mandamus relief where the trial court abused its discretion and denied Relator’s motion for new trial despite having satisfied Craddock test). | 1 | 1 |
Director, State Employees Workers' Compensation Division v. Evansgreen1 sentence2026Div. v. Evans, 889 S.W.2d 266, 270 (Tex. 1994). | 1 | 1 |
Mahoney v. Cuppgreen1 sentence2022In support of its argument that the trial court did not conduct an adequate hearing, USAA relies on three cases: Mahoney v. Cupp, 638 S.W.2d 257, 260 (Tex. –18– App.—Waco 1982, no writ); In the Interest of M.M.O., 981 S.W.2d 72 , 85–87 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1998, no pet.); and St. | 1 | 1 |
Hull v. Freedmangreen1 sentence2017Hull v. Freedman, 383 S.W.2d 236, 238 (Tex. Civ. | 1 | 1 |
Waisath v. Lack's Stores, Inc.green1 sentence2017Conversion is the “unauthorized and wrongful assumption and exercise of dominion and control over the personal property of another, to the exclusion of or inconsistent with the owner’s rights.” Waisath v. Lack’s Stores, Inc., 474 S.W.2d 444, 447 (Tex. 1971); see also Wells Fargo Bank Nw., N.A. v. RPK Capital XVI, L.L.C., 360 S.W.3d 691, 699 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2012, no pet.). | 1 | 1 |
Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, N.A. v. RPK Capital XVI, L.L.C.green1 sentence2017Conversion is the “unauthorized and wrongful assumption and exercise of dominion and control over the personal property of another, to the exclusion of or inconsistent with the owner’s rights.” Waisath v. Lack’s Stores, Inc., 474 S.W.2d 444, 447 (Tex. 1971); see also Wells Fargo Bank Nw., N.A. v. RPK Capital XVI, L.L.C., 360 S.W.3d 691, 699 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2012, no pet.). | 1 | 1 |
Republic Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Mex-Tex, Inc.green1 sentence2016See id. –7– challenges to the extent USAA’s motion asserted independent grounds supporting summary judgment. | 1 | 1 |
Bates v. Randall Countygreen2 sentences2016See Bates v. Randall Cty., 297 S.W.3d 828 , 833 & n.7 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2009, pet. denied); Triumph Trucking, Inc. v. S. Corp. Ins. 2016See Bates v. Randall Cty., 297 S.W.3d 828 , 833 & n. 7 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 2009, pet. denied); Triumph Trucking, Inc. v. S. Corp. Ins. | 1 | 1 |
Toonen v. United Services Automobile Ass'ngreen1 sentence2016See id. (holding, USAA’s motion and supporting proof were legally sufficient to establish (1) insured’s claim had been appraised pursuant to the policy, and (2) USAA had tendered the amount awarded by the appraisers; accordingly, USAA was entitled to summary judgment in its favor on insured’s breach of contract claim unless insured raised a fact issue on ground for setting aside the appraisal award); see also Cantu v. S. Ins. | 1 | 1 |
Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.green2 sentences2000See id. 2000See id. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In the Interest of M.M.O.
green
1 sentence2022In support of its argument that the trial court did not conduct an adequate hearing, USAA relies on three cases: Mahoney v. Cupp, 638 S.W.2d 257, 260 (Tex. –18– App.—Waco 1982, no writ); In the Interest of M.M.O., 981 S.W.2d 72 , 85–87 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1998, no pet.); and St. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Chicas v. Texas Mutual Insurance Co.
green
2 sentences2019As the court of appeals in this case noted, after Dubai and USAA, some courts of appeals continued to hold that the 45-day deadline to file suit under section 410.252(a) is jurisdictional without applying the USAA analysis to decide the issue. 522 S.W.3d at 71 (citing Davis v. Am. 2019As the court of appeals in this case noted, after Dubai and USAA, some courts of appeals continued to hold that the 45-day deadline to file suit under section 410.252(a) is jurisdictional without applying the USAA analysis to decide the issue. 522 S.W.3d at 71 (citing Davis v. Am. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
City of Keller v. Wilson
green
2 sentences2016City of Keller, 168 S.W.3d at 823 . 2016City of Keller, 168 S.W.3d at 823 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.