Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1916–2002 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Alvarado v. Farah Manufacturing Co.green2 sentences1993However, Alvarado further explains that “[t]he consequences of the rule should not be harsher in any case than the vice the rule seeks to correct. [T]he trial court should have a range of sanctions available to it to enforce rules without injustice. ‘The punishment should fit the crime.’ ” Alvarado, 830 S.W.2d at 915 (quoting TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. Powell, 811 S.W.2d 913, 917 (Tex.1991)). 1992The sole sanction should not be the exclusion of all evidence not properly identified in discovery; rather, as with other failures to comply with discovery, the trial court should have a range of sanctions available to it to enforce the rules without injustice.” 830 S.W.2d 911 at 915 (citing TransAmeri-can) (emphasis added). | 1 | 2 |
Mobil Oil Corp. v. Ellendergreen2 sentences2002See Ellender, 968 S.W.2d at 922 ; Hammerly Oaks, Inc. v. Edwards, 958 S.W.2d 387, 389 (Tex.1997). 2002See Ellender, 968 S.W.2d at 922 ; Hammerly Oaks, Inc. v. Edwards, 958 S.W.2d 387, 389 (Tex. 1997). | 1 | 1 |
Hammerly Oaks, Inc. v. Edwardsgreen2 sentences2002See Ellender, 968 S.W.2d at 922 ; Hammerly Oaks, Inc. v. Edwards, 958 S.W.2d 387, 389 (Tex.1997). 2002See Ellender, 968 S.W.2d at 922 ; Hammerly Oaks, Inc. v. Edwards, 958 S.W.2d 387, 389 (Tex. 1997). | 1 | 1 |
TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. Powellgreen1 sentence1993However, Alvarado further explains that “[t]he consequences of the rule should not be harsher in any case than the vice the rule seeks to correct. [T]he trial court should have a range of sanctions available to it to enforce rules without injustice. ‘The punishment should fit the crime.’ ” Alvarado, 830 S.W.2d at 915 (quoting TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. Powell, 811 S.W.2d 913, 917 (Tex.1991)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ft. Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. Lynch
green
2 sentences1929App.) 136 S. W. 580, 582 , as follows: “But the vice in the instruction does not lie in the fact that the jury were relieved of the duty to determine such a question, but in the fact that they might have construed the language complained of as indicating the view the court took of the testimony with reference to that phase of the case. 1916As was said in Railway Company v. Lynch, 136 S. W. 580 : “The vice in the instruction does not lie in the fact that the jury were relieved of the duty to determine such a question, but in the fact that they might have construed the language complained of as indicating the view the court court took of the testimony with reference to that phase of the case.” In Railway Co. v. Waldie, supra, the plaintiff, an employé, sued to recover damages for personal injuries received, .while assisting in loading iron rails from one car to another, under the direction of the company’s section foreman Collins, | 2 | 1916–1929 |
American Express Co. v. Chandler
neutral
1 sentence1938American Express Co. et al. v. Chandler, Tex.Com.App., 231 S.W. 1085 ; City of Houston v. Pillot et al., Tex.Com.App., 105 S.W.2d 870 ; Lamar v. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. | 1 | 1938–1938 |
City of Houston v. Pillot
green
1 sentence1938American Express Co. et al. v. Chandler, Tex.Com.App., 231 S.W. 1085 ; City of Houston v. Pillot et al., Tex.Com.App., 105 S.W.2d 870 ; Lamar v. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. | 1 | 1938–1938 |
Hearst v. Kuykendall
green
1 sentence1937The vice in this defense lies in the unmistakable fact that, while subsidiary provisions of the contract did so provide for the possible sale and division of the resulting proceeds of the properties that might be acquired in agreed proportions among them, the quoted further provisions of it just as unmistakably contemplated the acquirement of the lands and leases themselves in the specified joint ownership thereof as such, and the likewise quoted averments in the trial petition just as certainly declare upon the refusal of the appellants to divide the land itself in advance of any sale thereof | 1 | 1937–1937 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.