corresponding rule (Utah) · Go Syfert
← Utah issues

corresponding rule in Utah

7 Utah opinions name it 2 courts 2008–2025 4 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Utah courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Cline v. State, Division of Child & Family Servicesgreen
utahctapp · 2005 · cited in 1 Utah opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008
2 sentences

2008We nonetheless *978 affirm the trial court's dismissal of both claims because, as was explained in Cline v. State, 2005 UT App 498 , 142 P.3d 127 , Utah does not recognize a private right of action for perjury or obstruction of justice. 18 In Cline, this court stated that "[the existence of eriminal liability does not create automatically a corresponding claim for civil damages." Id. 129.

2008We nonetheless *978 affirm the trial court's dismissal of both claims because, as was explained in Cline v. State, 2005 UT App 498 , 142 P.3d 127 , Utah does not recognize a private right of action for perjury or obstruction of justice. 18 In Cline, this court stated that "[the existence of eriminal liability does not create automatically a corresponding claim for civil damages." Id. 129.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
Cougar Canyon v. The Cypress Fund green
utah · 2020
2 sentences

2021Cougar Canyon, 2020 UT 28 , ¶ 11 n.7 (citation omitted) (internal quotation ______________________________________________________________________________ 8 Notably, the current language of the corresponding rule of civil procedure no longer references “choses in action.” See UTAH R.

2021Cougar Canyon, 2020 UT 28 , ¶ 11 n.7 (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks ______________________________________________________________________________ 10 Notably, the current language of the corresponding rule of civil procedure no longer references “choses in action.” See UTAH R.

22021–2021
State v. Bridgewaters green
utah · 2020
2 sentences

2020The State has not challenged the constitutionality of (Continued . . .) 8 Cite as: 2020 UT 32 Opinion of the Court ¶25 Protective order petitions do not commence with a summons and complaint.

2020The Utah Supreme Court recently noted that the “Act contains unique procedural rules that purport to supersede the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure where applicable,” even though “the legislature did not enact those procedural provisions in a joint resolution that amended the corresponding rule of civil procedure.” State v. Bridgewaters, 2020 UT 32 , ¶ 24 n.9.

22020–2020
ASC Utah, Inc. v. Wolf Mountain Resorts, L.C. green
utah · 2010
2 sentences

2025And we agree with Lundberg that our supreme court’s decision in ASC Utah, Inc. v. Wolf Mountain Resorts, LC, 2010 UT 65 , 245 P.3d 184 , forecloses adoption of such a rule on those grounds. ¶52 In ASC Utah, a landowner had been involved in extensive contract litigation for three years when it filed a motion for leave 20230335-CA 27 2025 UT App 102 Vivint Solar v. Lundberg “to add several new parties to the litigation.” Id. ¶¶ 2‒7.

2025And we agree with Lundberg that our supreme court’s decision in ASC Utah, Inc. v. Wolf Mountain Resorts, LC, 2010 UT 65 , 245 P.3d 184 , forecloses adoption of such a rule on those grounds. ¶52 In ASC Utah, a landowner had been involved in extensive contract litigation for three years when it filed a motion for leave 20230335-CA 27 2025 UT App 102 Vivint Solar v. Lundberg “to add several new parties to the litigation.” Id. ¶¶ 2‒7.

12025–2025
Vivint Solar v. Lundberg neutral
utahctapp · 2025
2 sentences

2025And we agree with Lundberg that our supreme court’s decision in ASC Utah, Inc. v. Wolf Mountain Resorts, LC, 2010 UT 65 , 245 P.3d 184 , forecloses adoption of such a rule on those grounds. ¶52 In ASC Utah, a landowner had been involved in extensive contract litigation for three years when it filed a motion for leave 20230335-CA 27 2025 UT App 102 Vivint Solar v. Lundberg “to add several new parties to the litigation.” Id. ¶¶ 2‒7.

2025And we agree with Lundberg that our supreme court’s decision in ASC Utah, Inc. v. Wolf Mountain Resorts, LC, 2010 UT 65 , 245 P.3d 184 , forecloses adoption of such a rule on those grounds. ¶52 In ASC Utah, a landowner had been involved in extensive contract litigation for three years when it filed a motion for leave 20230335-CA 27 2025 UT App 102 Vivint Solar v. Lundberg “to add several new parties to the litigation.” Id. ¶¶ 2‒7.

12025–2025
State v. Rettig green
utah · 2017
1 sentence

2024Under those rules, “[a]n issue is preserved for appeal when it has been presented to the district court in such a __________________________________________________________ 66 2017 UT 83 , ¶ 58. 67 2010 UT 35 , ¶¶ 30–31 (cleaned up). 68 Because the withdrawal of a not-guilty plea is governed by subsection (1), this decision does not affect that subsection.

12024–2024
State v. Drej green
utah · 2010
1 sentence

2024Under those rules, “[a]n issue is preserved for appeal when it has been presented to the district court in such a __________________________________________________________ 66 2017 UT 83 , ¶ 58. 67 2010 UT 35 , ¶¶ 30–31 (cleaned up). 68 Because the withdrawal of a not-guilty plea is governed by subsection (1), this decision does not affect that subsection.

12024–2024
Pon v. Brewer green
utahctapp · 2020
1 sentence

2020Although (continued…) 20190542-CA 6 2020 UT App 99 Pon v. Brewer ¶12 Here, the more specific ten-day deadline set forth in the Act controls, not the more general fourteen-day deadline set (…continued) the conflict between the rule and the statute may present legitimate constitutional questions, as noted above, the constitutionality of the Act is not properly before us in this case.

12020–2020

Where else courts name it

IL 32 (1910–2024) CA 31 (1974–2026) MD 18 (1942–2017) FL 17 (1982–2026) MO 17 (1884–2025) TX 16 (1874–2026) NY 16 (1879–2026) PA 15 (1831–2025) NJ 14 (1988–2025) MA 13 (1974–2020) IN 9 (1978–2018) CT 9 (1967–2022) WA 9 (1955–2020) TN 7 (1974–2023) IA 7 (1959–2024) UT 7 (2008–2025) OH 7 (1982–2024) MI 7 (1970–2026) WI 7 (1987–2020) ME 6 (1870–2017) CO 6 (1936–2026) OK 6 (1972–2020) VT 6 (1930–2018) MS 6 (1922–2023) OR 5 (1959–1999) GA 5 (1928–2021) AR 5 (2000–2024) NM 5 (2003–2020) AL 5 (1928–2017) DC 4 (1992–2018) MT 4 (2007–2021) KY 4 (1998–2021) MN 3 (2003–2006) NE 3 (1988–2023) KS 3 (1926–2021) ND 3 (1996–2011) DE 3 (1978–2003) SD 2 (2009–2023) PR 2 (1932–1942) HI 2 (1978–1994) AZ 2 (2010–2014) NC 2 (1982–2015) ID 2 (2003–2015)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check