Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1967–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. McCahillgreen2 sentences2017The text and history of the 1967 public act enacting § 54-63g suggest that "accused" and like terms were used in the public act simply to distinguish formally charged persons for whom release decisions continued to rest with the court from "arrested" persons for whom the newly created bail commission determined appropriate conditions of release. 4 See Public Acts 1967, No. **935 549 (P.A. 549) ("An Act Concerning Bail Procedures for Arrested Persons"); P.A. 549, § 1 (providing definition for " 'arrested person' " and " 'bail commissioner,' " but not "accused"); see also State v. McCahill , 261 2017The text and history of the 1967 public act enacting § 54-63g suggest that "accused" and like terms were used in the public act simply to distinguish formally charged persons for whom release decisions continued to rest with the court from "arrested" persons for whom the newly created bail commission determined appropriate conditions of release. 4 See Public Acts 1967, No. **935 549 (P.A. 549) ("An Act Concerning Bail Procedures for Arrested Persons"); P.A. 549, § 1 (providing definition for " 'arrested person' " and " 'bail commissioner,' " but not "accused"); see also State v. McCahill , 261 | 2 | 2 |
Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation v. Wold Engineering, P. C.green2 sentences2007See Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation v. Wold Engineering, P.C., 476 U.S. 877, 891 , 106 S. Ct. 2305 , 90 L. 2007See Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation v. Wold Engineering, P.C., 476 U.S. 877, 891 , 106 S. Ct. 2305 , 90 L. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Paylan v. St. Mary's Hospital Corp.
neutral
2 sentences2020Mary’s Hospital Corp., 118 Conn. App. 258, 264 , 983 A.2d 56 (2009) (discussing whether plaintiff adduced sufficient evidence at trial to warrant spolia- tion instruction under Beers). 2020Mary’s Hospital Corp., 118 Conn. App. 258, 264 , 983 A.2d 56 (2009) (discussing whether plaintiff adduced sufficient evidence at trial to warrant spolia- tion instruction under Beers). | 2 | 2020–2020 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences2022We begin by setting forth the law governing claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and the corresponding standard of review. ‘‘In Strickland v. Washington, [ 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S. Ct. 2052 , 80 L. 2022We begin by setting forth the law governing claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and the corresponding standard of review. ‘‘In Strickland v. Washington, [ 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S. Ct. 2052 , 80 L. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Myers
green
2 sentences2011Implicit in this very demanding standard is the notion . . . that invocation of the plain error doctrine is reserved for occasions requiring the reversal of the judg- *797 merit under review.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Myers, 290 Conn. 278, 289 , 963 A.2d 11 (2009). 6 We thus need not reach the state’s corresponding claim that the over-breadth doctrine does not apply to conditions of probation. 7 The defendant repeatedly refers to photographs of his former girlfriend and his wife, and sometimes makes reference to his wife or marriage in his arguments. 2011Implicit in this very demanding standard is the notion . . . that invocation of the plain error doctrine is reserved for occasions requiring the reversal of the judg- *797 merit under review.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Myers, 290 Conn. 278, 289 , 963 A.2d 11 (2009). 6 We thus need not reach the state’s corresponding claim that the over-breadth doctrine does not apply to conditions of probation. 7 The defendant repeatedly refers to photographs of his former girlfriend and his wife, and sometimes makes reference to his wife or marriage in his arguments. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.
green
2 sentences2000A loss of consortium claim is "dependant for its assertion. on the legal viability of the cause of action in the injured party." Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., 212 Conn. 509 , 564 , 562 A.2d 1100 (1989). 2000A loss of consortium claim is "dependant for its assertion. on the legal viability of the cause of action in the injured party." Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., 212 Conn. 509 , 564 , 562 A.2d 1100 (1989). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Jacoby v. Brinckerhoff
green
2 sentences2000In addition, the defendants argue that because the plaintiff "has filed this suit in her individual capacity, no argument can be made that she has stated a claim for injuries on behalf of her husband." The plaintiff responds in its opposition memorandum that "there is indeed, a corresponding claim for personal injuries from which [the] plaintiff's loss of consortium derives," and notes that the plaintiff "has filed a corresponding personal injury claim, namely, wrongful death, on behalf of her deceased husband," the matter of Yelizaveta Shuster Administratrix of Estate of Abraham Shuster v. Ya 2000In addition, the defendants argue that because the plaintiff "has filed this suit in her individual capacity, no argument can be made that she has stated a claim for injuries on behalf of her husband." The plaintiff responds in its opposition memorandum that "there is indeed, a corresponding claim for personal injuries from which [the] plaintiff's loss of consortium derives," and notes that the plaintiff "has filed a corresponding personal injury claim, namely, wrongful death, on behalf of her deceased husband," the matter of Yelizaveta Shuster Administratrix of Estate of Abraham Shuster v. Ya | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Giordenello v. United States
green
2 sentences1967Giordenello v. United States, 357 U.S. 480 , 78 S. Ct. 1245 , 2 L. 1967Giordenello v. United States, 357 U.S. 480 , 78 S. Ct. 1245 , 2 L. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.