Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Utah opinions name it 2 courts 1995–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Utah courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Liska v. Liskagreen1 sentence2001This issue "presents a question of law," which we "review ... under a correction of error standard, giving no particular deference to the trial court's determination." Liska v. Liska, 902 P.2d 644, 646-47 (Utah Ct.App.1995). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Morgan
neutral
1 sentence2023The State suggested that the court might consider revoking and reinstating probation, having Morgan serve 120 days in jail, and then putting him on an alcohol ankle monitor for another 90 or 120 days to hold him accountable for drinking. 20230251-CA 2 2023 UT App 119 State v. Morgan ¶6 Morgan’s counsel (Counsel) indicated that an ankle monitor would be an appropriate solution. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Busche v. Busche
green
2 sentences2015Cf. Busche v. Busche, 2012 UT App 16, ¶ 28 , 272 P.3d 748 (observing that an order to show cause hearing was a child support enforcement action). 2015Cf. Busche v. Busche, 2012 UT App 16, ¶ 28 , 272 P.3d 748 (observing that an order to show cause hearing was a child support enforcement action). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Bearden v. Georgia
green
2 sentences2014T8 Pantelakis first argues that we should incorporate the willfulness standard for termination of probation articulated in Bearden v. Georgia, 461 U.S. 660 , 103 S.Ct. 2064 , 76 L.Ed.2d 221 (1983), into Utah's statutory scheme governing termination of plea in abeyance agreements. 2014T8 Pantelakis first argues that we should incorporate the willfulness standard for termination of probation articulated in Bearden v. Georgia, 461 U.S. 660 , 103 S.Ct. 2064 , 76 L.Ed.2d 221 (1983), into Utah's statutory scheme governing termination of plea in abeyance agreements. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Orr
green
2 sentences2013State v. Orr, 2005 UT 92, ¶ 9 , 127 P.3d 1213 . 2013State v. Orr, 2005 UT 92, ¶ 9 , 127 P.3d 1213 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Matter of Discipline of Schwenke
green
1 sentence2004Id. at 575 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Larson v. Larson
green
1 sentence1995We previously have noted that res judicata does not apply to " 'child custody and related proceedings ... where the welfare of children is at stake.' ” Larson v. Larson, 888 P.2d 719 , 722 n. 2 (Utah App.1994) (quoting In re J.J.T., 877 P.2d 161, 163 (Utah App.1994)). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.