Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Virginia opinions name it 2 courts 1972–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Maye v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2024Likewise, in Maye v. Commonwealth, 213 Va. 48 (1972), the Supreme Court of Virginia also clearly stated, “A claim that a statute on its face contains no requirement of mens rea or scienter is no ground for holding the statute unconstitutional since such requirement will be read into the statute by the court when it appears the legislature implicitly intended that it must be proved.” Id. at 49 (citing Morissette v. United States, 342 U.S. 246, 250 (1952)). 2024Likewise, in Maye v. Commonwealth, 213 Va. 48 (1972), the Supreme Court of Virginia also clearly stated, “A claim that a statute on its face contains no requirement of mens rea or scienter is no ground for holding the statute unconstitutional since such requirement will be read into the statute by the court when it appears the legislature implicitly intended that it must be proved.” Id. at 49 (citing Morissette v. United States, 342 U.S. 246, 250 (1952)). | 5 | 6 |
Morissette v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2024Likewise, in Maye v. Commonwealth, 213 Va. 48 (1972), the Supreme Court of Virginia also clearly stated, “A claim that a statute on its face contains no requirement of mens rea or scienter is no ground for holding the statute unconstitutional since such requirement will be read into the statute by the court when it appears the legislature implicitly intended that it must be proved.” Id. at 49 (citing Morissette v. United States, 342 U.S. 246, 250 (1952)). 2022See id. at 49 (“A claim that a statute on its face contains no requirement of Mens rea or Scienter is no ground for holding the statute unconstitutional since such requirement will be read into the statute by the court when it appears the legislature implicitly intended that it must be proved.” (citing Morissette, 342 U.S. at 250 )). | 4 | 4 |
Virginia v. Hicksgreen1 sentence2024Virginia v. Hicks, 539 U.S. 113, 118-19 (2003). | 1 | 1 |
Molash v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences1991In Maye v. Commonwealth, the Supreme Court of Virginia stated: A claim that a statute on its face contains no requirement of mens rea or scienter is no ground for holding the statute unconstitutional since such requirement will be read into the statute by the court when it appears the legislature implicitly intended that it must be proved. 213 Va. 48, 49 , 189 S.E.2d 350, 351 (1972); see also Molash v. Commonwealth, 3 Va. App. 243, 246 , 348 S.E.2d 868, 870 (1986). 1991In Maye v. Commonwealth, the Supreme Court of Virginia stated: A claim that a statute on its face contains no requirement of mens rea or scienter is no ground for holding the statute unconstitutional since such requirement will be read into the statute by the court when it appears the legislature implicitly intended that it must be proved. 213 Va. 48, 49 , 189 S.E.2d 350, 351 (1972); see also Molash v. Commonwealth, 3 Va. App. 243, 246 , 348 S.E.2d 868, 870 (1986). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Thomas F. Johnsongreen1 sentence1972Morissette v. United States, 342 U.S. 246, 250 (1952); United States v. Johnson, 419 F.2d 56, 60 (4th Cir. 1969), cert. den., 397 U.S. 1010 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Johnson v. United States
neutral
1 sentence1972Morissette v. United States, 342 U.S. 246, 250 (1952); United States v. Johnson, 419 F.2d 56, 60 (4th Cir. 1969), cert. den., 397 U.S. 1010 . | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.