Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 2010–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mortensen v. LeFevregreen1 sentence2018See, e.g., Mortensen v. LeFevre, 674 P.2d 134 (Utah 1983); Salisbury Livestock Co. v. Colo. Cent. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Figueroa
green
2 sentences2014Figueroa, 235 Conn. at 182 -83. 2014Figueroa, 235 Conn. at 182-83 . | 2 | 2014–2014 |
In re the Personal Restraint of Andress
red
2 sentences2011State v. Gamble, 118 Wash.App. 332, 336 , 72 P.3d 1139 (2003) (one count of second degree felony murder, vacated due to In re Personal Restraint of Andress, 147 Wash.2d 602 , 56 P.3d 981 (2002), reduced to one count of first degree manslaughter), rev'd in part on other grounds, 154 Wash.2d 457, 469-70 , 114 P.3d 646 (2005) (holding manslaughter was not a lesser included offense of second degree felony murder where assault was the predicate felony). ¶ 15 The question in this case is whether the articulation of the rule announced by the Supreme Court in Green or the interpretation by the Court o 2011App. 332, 336 , 72 P.3d 1139 (2003) (one count of second degree felony murder, vacated due to In re Personal Restraint of Andress, 147 Wn.2d 602 , 56 P.3d 981 (2002), reduced to one count of first degree manslaughter), rev’d in part on other grounds, 154 Wn.2d 457, 469-70 , 114 P.3d 646 (2005) (holding manslaughter was not a lesser included offense of second degree felony murder where assault was the predicate felony). ¶15 The question in this case is whether the articulation of the rule announced by the Supreme Court in Green or the interpretation by the Court of Appeals in the Gilbert/ Gambl | 2 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Gamble
neutral
2 sentences2011State v. Gamble, 118 Wash.App. 332, 336 , 72 P.3d 1139 (2003) (one count of second degree felony murder, vacated due to In re Personal Restraint of Andress, 147 Wash.2d 602 , 56 P.3d 981 (2002), reduced to one count of first degree manslaughter), rev'd in part on other grounds, 154 Wash.2d 457, 469-70 , 114 P.3d 646 (2005) (holding manslaughter was not a lesser included offense of second degree felony murder where assault was the predicate felony). ¶ 15 The question in this case is whether the articulation of the rule announced by the Supreme Court in Green or the interpretation by the Court o 2011App. 332, 336 , 72 P.3d 1139 (2003) (one count of second degree felony murder, vacated due to In re Personal Restraint of Andress, 147 Wn.2d 602 , 56 P.3d 981 (2002), reduced to one count of first degree manslaughter), rev’d in part on other grounds, 154 Wn.2d 457, 469-70 , 114 P.3d 646 (2005) (holding manslaughter was not a lesser included offense of second degree felony murder where assault was the predicate felony). ¶15 The question in this case is whether the articulation of the rule announced by the Supreme Court in Green or the interpretation by the Court of Appeals in the Gilbert/ Gambl | 2 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Gamble
green
2 sentences2011State v. Gamble, 118 Wash.App. 332, 336 , 72 P.3d 1139 (2003) (one count of second degree felony murder, vacated due to In re Personal Restraint of Andress, 147 Wash.2d 602 , 56 P.3d 981 (2002), reduced to one count of first degree manslaughter), rev'd in part on other grounds, 154 Wash.2d 457, 469-70 , 114 P.3d 646 (2005) (holding manslaughter was not a lesser included offense of second degree felony murder where assault was the predicate felony). ¶ 15 The question in this case is whether the articulation of the rule announced by the Supreme Court in Green or the interpretation by the Court o 2011App. 332, 336 , 72 P.3d 1139 (2003) (one count of second degree felony murder, vacated due to In re Personal Restraint of Andress, 147 Wn.2d 602 , 56 P.3d 981 (2002), reduced to one count of first degree manslaughter), rev’d in part on other grounds, 154 Wn.2d 457, 469-70 , 114 P.3d 646 (2005) (holding manslaughter was not a lesser included offense of second degree felony murder where assault was the predicate felony). ¶15 The question in this case is whether the articulation of the rule announced by the Supreme Court in Green or the interpretation by the Court of Appeals in the Gilbert/ Gambl | 2 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Gamble
green
2 sentences2011State v. Gamble, 118 Wash.App. 332, 336 , 72 P.3d 1139 (2003) (one count of second degree felony murder, vacated due to In re Personal Restraint of Andress, 147 Wash.2d 602 , 56 P.3d 981 (2002), reduced to one count of first degree manslaughter), rev'd in part on other grounds, 154 Wash.2d 457, 469-70 , 114 P.3d 646 (2005) (holding manslaughter was not a lesser included offense of second degree felony murder where assault was the predicate felony). ¶ 15 The question in this case is whether the articulation of the rule announced by the Supreme Court in Green or the interpretation by the Court o 2011App. 332, 336 , 72 P.3d 1139 (2003) (one count of second degree felony murder, vacated due to In re Personal Restraint of Andress, 147 Wn.2d 602 , 56 P.3d 981 (2002), reduced to one count of first degree manslaughter), rev’d in part on other grounds, 154 Wn.2d 457, 469-70 , 114 P.3d 646 (2005) (holding manslaughter was not a lesser included offense of second degree felony murder where assault was the predicate felony). ¶15 The question in this case is whether the articulation of the rule announced by the Supreme Court in Green or the interpretation by the Court of Appeals in the Gilbert/ Gambl | 2 | 2011–2011 |
In Re Personal Restraint of Andress
red
2 sentences2011State v. Gamble, 118 Wash.App. 332, 336 , 72 P.3d 1139 (2003) (one count of second degree felony murder, vacated due to In re Personal Restraint of Andress, 147 Wash.2d 602 , 56 P.3d 981 (2002), reduced to one count of first degree manslaughter), rev'd in part on other grounds, 154 Wash.2d 457, 469-70 , 114 P.3d 646 (2005) (holding manslaughter was not a lesser included offense of second degree felony murder where assault was the predicate felony). ¶ 15 The question in this case is whether the articulation of the rule announced by the Supreme Court in Green or the interpretation by the Court o 2011App. 332, 336 , 72 P.3d 1139 (2003) (one count of second degree felony murder, vacated due to In re Personal Restraint of Andress, 147 Wn.2d 602 , 56 P.3d 981 (2002), reduced to one count of first degree manslaughter), rev’d in part on other grounds, 154 Wn.2d 457, 469-70 , 114 P.3d 646 (2005) (holding manslaughter was not a lesser included offense of second degree felony murder where assault was the predicate felony). ¶15 The question in this case is whether the articulation of the rule announced by the Supreme Court in Green or the interpretation by the Court of Appeals in the Gilbert/ Gambl | 2 | 2011–2011 |
Thiringer v. American Motors Insurance
green
2 sentences2010Id. 2010Id. | 2 | 2010–2010 |
State v. Gamble
green
1 sentence2011State v. Gamble, 118 Wash.App. 332, 336 , 72 P.3d 1139 (2003) (one count of second degree felony murder, vacated due to In re Personal Restraint of Andress, 147 Wash.2d 602 , 56 P.3d 981 (2002), reduced to one count of first degree manslaughter), rev'd in part on other grounds, 154 Wash.2d 457, 469-70 , 114 P.3d 646 (2005) (holding manslaughter was not a lesser included offense of second degree felony murder where assault was the predicate felony). ¶ 15 The question in this case is whether the articulation of the rule announced by the Supreme Court in Green or the interpretation by the Court o | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.