Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Maryland opinions name it 3 courts 1992–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ferguson v. City of Charlestongreen1 sentence2015See also Ferguson, 532 U.S. at 74 n.7 (describing origin of the term). | 1 | 1 |
Steinberg v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Boardgreen2 sentences1996In Steinberg v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board, 87 Cal.App.3d 582, 585 , 151 Cal.Rptr. 133, 134-35 (1978), for example, California’s intermediate appellate court said: A claimant is said to have constructively quit his job when, although discharged by the employer, the claimant himself set in motion the chain of events which resulted in the employer’s having no choice except to terminate him. 1996In Steinberg v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board, 87 Cal.App.3d 582, 585 , 151 Cal.Rptr. 133, 134-35 (1978), for example, California’s intermediate appellate court said: A claimant is said to have constructively quit his job when, although discharged by the employer, the claimant himself set in motion the chain of events which resulted in the employer’s having no choice except to terminate him. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bayne v. Secretary of State
green
2 sentences2018Gen. 139) and the Opinion of this Court in Bayne v. Secretary of State, supra , 283 Md. 560 , 392 A.2d 67 . 2018Gen. 139) and the Opinion of this Court in Bayne v. Secretary of State, supra , 283 Md. 560 , 392 A.2d 67 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Graham v. State
green
2 sentences2017In Graham v. State, 146 Md.App. 327, 359 , 807 A.2d 75 (2002), this Court spoke of the articulation requirement: “One of the key requirements of reasonable suspicion, for either a stop or a frisk, is not only that it be present but that it be actually articulated. 2017In Graham v. State, 146 Md.App. 327, 359 , 807 A.2d 75 (2002), this Court spoke of the articulation requirement: “One of the key requirements of reasonable suspicion, for either a stop or a frisk, is not only that it be present but that it be actually articulated. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
New Jersey v. T. L. O.
green
1 sentence2015This broader articulation of the principle came to be known as the “special needs” exception after Justice Blackmun first used the term in his concurrence in New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325 , Gen. 3] 23 351 (1985). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Illinois v. Gates
green
2 sentences2002Indeed, as will be discussed, this Court’s articulation of the test in Stanley played a not insignificant role in the overthrow of the entire Aguilar-Spinelli regime nine years later in Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983). 2002Indeed, as will be discussed, this Court’s articulation of the test in Stanley played a not insignificant role in the overthrow of the entire Aguilar-Spinelli regime nine years later in Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Lewis v. M. C.C. of Cumberland
green
2 sentences1992C. of Cumberland, 189 Md. 58 , 54 A.2d 319 (1947). 1992C. of Cumberland, 189 Md. 58 , 54 A.2d 319 (1947). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.