undoubted rule (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

undoubted rule in Washington

7 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 1909–1961 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (21)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Myrberg neutral
wash · 1909
2 sentences

1961Such is the undoubted rule, [fourteen cases cited]” State v. Myrberg (1909), 56 Wash. 384, 386 , 105 Pac. 622 .

1961Such is the undoubted rule, [fourteen cases cited]” State v. Myrberg (1909), 56 Wash. 384, 386 , 105 Pac. 622 .

11961–1961
State v. Ewing green
wash · 1912
2 sentences

1961Another case in point, which quotes one of the statutes to which we have referred, is State v. Ewing (1912), 67 Wash. 395 , 121 Pac. 834 , where the defendant was charged with first degree assault on Sylvia Russell, and the evidence tended to show that the person assaulted was Sylvia Ewing, the wife of the accused.

1961Another case in point, which quotes one of the statutes to which we have referred, is State v. Ewing (1912), 67 Wash. 395 , 121 Pac. 834 , where the defendant was charged with first degree assault on Sylvia Russell, and the evidence tended to show that the person assaulted was Sylvia Ewing, the wife of the accused.

11961–1961
Mills v. Meyer neutral
wash · 1952
1 sentence

1959The undoubted rule is that stated in Mills v. Meyer, 40 Wn. (2d) 369, 243 P. (2d) 491 : “The uniform sales act, as adopted in Washington, Rem.

11959–1959
National Bank v. Insurance Co. green
scotus · 1881
1 sentence

1923“In the ease of Pennell v. Deffell (4 De G., M. & G., 372, 388), Lord Justice Turner said: ‘It is, I apprehend, an undoubted principle of this court, that as between cestui que trust and trustee and all parties claiming under the trustee, otherwise than by purchase for valuable consideration without notice, all property belonging to a trust, however much it may be changed or altered in its nature or character, and all the fruit of such property, whether in its original or in its altered state, continues to be subject to or affected by the trust.’ In the same case, Lord Justice Knight Bruce sai

11923–1923
Barber v. Burrows green
cal · 1876
1 sentence

1920It is the undoubted rule that where the contract contemplates the execution of it by signing, either party has the right to insist upon the condition, and mere acts of performance on the part of one who has not signed will not validate the contract. ’ ’ In Aftergut Co. v. Mulvihill, 25 Cal. App. 784 , 145 Pac. 728 , it is said: “And as it was the expressed intention of the parties that it should be reduced to writing and signed by them, certain it is that, this stipulation not having been performed, the contract cannot be regarded as binding on either-of the parties.” In Barber v. Burrows, 51

11920–1920
Sam Aftergut Co. v. Mulvihill neutral
calctapp · 1914
2 sentences

1920It is the undoubted rule that where the contract contemplates the execution of it by signing, either party has the right to insist upon the condition, and mere acts of performance on the part of one who has not signed will not validate the contract. ’ ’ In Aftergut Co. v. Mulvihill, 25 Cal. App. 784 , 145 Pac. 728 , it is said: “And as it was the expressed intention of the parties that it should be reduced to writing and signed by them, certain it is that, this stipulation not having been performed, the contract cannot be regarded as binding on either-of the parties.” In Barber v. Burrows, 51

1920It is the undoubted rule that where the contract contemplates the execution of it by signing, either party has the right to insist upon the condition, and mere acts of performance on the part of one who has not signed will not validate the contract. ’ ’ In Aftergut Co. v. Mulvihill, 25 Cal. App. 784 , 145 Pac. 728 , it is said: “And as it was the expressed intention of the parties that it should be reduced to writing and signed by them, certain it is that, this stipulation not having been performed, the contract cannot be regarded as binding on either-of the parties.” In Barber v. Burrows, 51

11920–1920
Jones v. State green
ga · 1880
1 sentence

1909State v. Seely, 30 Ark. 162 ; Jones v. State, 65 Ga. 147 ; Robinson v. Commonwealth, 88 Ky. 386 , 11 S. W. 210 ; Commonwealth v. Trainor, 123 Mass. 414 ; People v. Leong Quong, 60 Cal. 107 ; Reddick v. State, 25 Fla. 112, 433 , 5 South. 704 ; Vandermark v. People, 47 Ill. 122 ; Ehlert v. State, 93 Ind. 76 ; Bell v. State, 25 Tex. 575 ; State v. Johnson, 67 N. C. 55 ; McBeth v. State, 50 Miss. 81 ; State v. Bundy, 64 Me. 507 ; State v. Peterson, 70 Me. 216 .

11909–1909
Ehlert v. State neutral
ind · 1884
1 sentence

1909State v. Seely, 30 Ark. 162 ; Jones v. State, 65 Ga. 147 ; Robinson v. Commonwealth, 88 Ky. 386 , 11 S. W. 210 ; Commonwealth v. Trainor, 123 Mass. 414 ; People v. Leong Quong, 60 Cal. 107 ; Reddick v. State, 25 Fla. 112, 433 , 5 South. 704 ; Vandermark v. People, 47 Ill. 122 ; Ehlert v. State, 93 Ind. 76 ; Bell v. State, 25 Tex. 575 ; State v. Johnson, 67 N. C. 55 ; McBeth v. State, 50 Miss. 81 ; State v. Bundy, 64 Me. 507 ; State v. Peterson, 70 Me. 216 .

11909–1909
Robinson v. Commonwealth neutral
kyctapp · 1889
1 sentence

1909State v. Seely, 30 Ark. 162 ; Jones v. State, 65 Ga. 147 ; Robinson v. Commonwealth, 88 Ky. 386 , 11 S. W. 210 ; Commonwealth v. Trainor, 123 Mass. 414 ; People v. Leong Quong, 60 Cal. 107 ; Reddick v. State, 25 Fla. 112, 433 , 5 South. 704 ; Vandermark v. People, 47 Ill. 122 ; Ehlert v. State, 93 Ind. 76 ; Bell v. State, 25 Tex. 575 ; State v. Johnson, 67 N. C. 55 ; McBeth v. State, 50 Miss. 81 ; State v. Bundy, 64 Me. 507 ; State v. Peterson, 70 Me. 216 .

11909–1909
State v. Seely green
ark · 1875
1 sentence

1909State v. Seely, 30 Ark. 162 ; Jones v. State, 65 Ga. 147 ; Robinson v. Commonwealth, 88 Ky. 386 , 11 S. W. 210 ; Commonwealth v. Trainor, 123 Mass. 414 ; People v. Leong Quong, 60 Cal. 107 ; Reddick v. State, 25 Fla. 112, 433 , 5 South. 704 ; Vandermark v. People, 47 Ill. 122 ; Ehlert v. State, 93 Ind. 76 ; Bell v. State, 25 Tex. 575 ; State v. Johnson, 67 N. C. 55 ; McBeth v. State, 50 Miss. 81 ; State v. Bundy, 64 Me. 507 ; State v. Peterson, 70 Me. 216 .

11909–1909
Commonwealth v. Trainor neutral
mass · 1877
1 sentence

1909State v. Seely, 30 Ark. 162 ; Jones v. State, 65 Ga. 147 ; Robinson v. Commonwealth, 88 Ky. 386 , 11 S. W. 210 ; Commonwealth v. Trainor, 123 Mass. 414 ; People v. Leong Quong, 60 Cal. 107 ; Reddick v. State, 25 Fla. 112, 433 , 5 South. 704 ; Vandermark v. People, 47 Ill. 122 ; Ehlert v. State, 93 Ind. 76 ; Bell v. State, 25 Tex. 575 ; State v. Johnson, 67 N. C. 55 ; McBeth v. State, 50 Miss. 81 ; State v. Bundy, 64 Me. 507 ; State v. Peterson, 70 Me. 216 .

11909–1909
Roth v. Shupp green
md · 1901
2 sentences

1909Roth v. Shupp, 94 Md. 55, 50 Atl. 430 ; Farmer v. Crosby, 43 Minn. 459 , 45 N. W. 866 ; Cooley, Torts (3d ed.), 221.

1909Roth v. Shupp, 94 Md. 55, 50 Atl. 430 ; Farmer v. Crosby, 43 Minn. 459 , 45 N. W. 866 ; Cooley, Torts (3d ed.), 221.

11909–1909
People v. Leong Quong neutral
cal · 1882
1 sentence

1909State v. Seely, 30 Ark. 162 ; Jones v. State, 65 Ga. 147 ; Robinson v. Commonwealth, 88 Ky. 386 , 11 S. W. 210 ; Commonwealth v. Trainor, 123 Mass. 414 ; People v. Leong Quong, 60 Cal. 107 ; Reddick v. State, 25 Fla. 112, 433 , 5 South. 704 ; Vandermark v. People, 47 Ill. 122 ; Ehlert v. State, 93 Ind. 76 ; Bell v. State, 25 Tex. 575 ; State v. Johnson, 67 N. C. 55 ; McBeth v. State, 50 Miss. 81 ; State v. Bundy, 64 Me. 507 ; State v. Peterson, 70 Me. 216 .

11909–1909
State v. . Johnson neutral
nc · 1872
1 sentence

1909State v. Seely, 30 Ark. 162 ; Jones v. State, 65 Ga. 147 ; Robinson v. Commonwealth, 88 Ky. 386 , 11 S. W. 210 ; Commonwealth v. Trainor, 123 Mass. 414 ; People v. Leong Quong, 60 Cal. 107 ; Reddick v. State, 25 Fla. 112, 433 , 5 South. 704 ; Vandermark v. People, 47 Ill. 122 ; Ehlert v. State, 93 Ind. 76 ; Bell v. State, 25 Tex. 575 ; State v. Johnson, 67 N. C. 55 ; McBeth v. State, 50 Miss. 81 ; State v. Bundy, 64 Me. 507 ; State v. Peterson, 70 Me. 216 .

11909–1909
Reddick v. State green
fla · 1889
1 sentence

1909State v. Seely, 30 Ark. 162 ; Jones v. State, 65 Ga. 147 ; Robinson v. Commonwealth, 88 Ky. 386 , 11 S. W. 210 ; Commonwealth v. Trainor, 123 Mass. 414 ; People v. Leong Quong, 60 Cal. 107 ; Reddick v. State, 25 Fla. 112, 433 , 5 South. 704 ; Vandermark v. People, 47 Ill. 122 ; Ehlert v. State, 93 Ind. 76 ; Bell v. State, 25 Tex. 575 ; State v. Johnson, 67 N. C. 55 ; McBeth v. State, 50 Miss. 81 ; State v. Bundy, 64 Me. 507 ; State v. Peterson, 70 Me. 216 .

11909–1909
State v. Bundy neutral
me · 1874
1 sentence

1909State v. Seely, 30 Ark. 162 ; Jones v. State, 65 Ga. 147 ; Robinson v. Commonwealth, 88 Ky. 386 , 11 S. W. 210 ; Commonwealth v. Trainor, 123 Mass. 414 ; People v. Leong Quong, 60 Cal. 107 ; Reddick v. State, 25 Fla. 112, 433 , 5 South. 704 ; Vandermark v. People, 47 Ill. 122 ; Ehlert v. State, 93 Ind. 76 ; Bell v. State, 25 Tex. 575 ; State v. Johnson, 67 N. C. 55 ; McBeth v. State, 50 Miss. 81 ; State v. Bundy, 64 Me. 507 ; State v. Peterson, 70 Me. 216 .

11909–1909
State v. Peterson neutral
me · 1879
1 sentence

1909State v. Seely, 30 Ark. 162 ; Jones v. State, 65 Ga. 147 ; Robinson v. Commonwealth, 88 Ky. 386 , 11 S. W. 210 ; Commonwealth v. Trainor, 123 Mass. 414 ; People v. Leong Quong, 60 Cal. 107 ; Reddick v. State, 25 Fla. 112, 433 , 5 South. 704 ; Vandermark v. People, 47 Ill. 122 ; Ehlert v. State, 93 Ind. 76 ; Bell v. State, 25 Tex. 575 ; State v. Johnson, 67 N. C. 55 ; McBeth v. State, 50 Miss. 81 ; State v. Bundy, 64 Me. 507 ; State v. Peterson, 70 Me. 216 .

11909–1909
Vandermark v. People neutral
ill · 1868
1 sentence

1909State v. Seely, 30 Ark. 162 ; Jones v. State, 65 Ga. 147 ; Robinson v. Commonwealth, 88 Ky. 386 , 11 S. W. 210 ; Commonwealth v. Trainor, 123 Mass. 414 ; People v. Leong Quong, 60 Cal. 107 ; Reddick v. State, 25 Fla. 112, 433 , 5 South. 704 ; Vandermark v. People, 47 Ill. 122 ; Ehlert v. State, 93 Ind. 76 ; Bell v. State, 25 Tex. 575 ; State v. Johnson, 67 N. C. 55 ; McBeth v. State, 50 Miss. 81 ; State v. Bundy, 64 Me. 507 ; State v. Peterson, 70 Me. 216 .

11909–1909
Farmer v. Crosby green
minn · 1890
2 sentences

1909Roth v. Shupp, 94 Md. 55, 50 Atl. 430 ; Farmer v. Crosby, 43 Minn. 459 , 45 N. W. 866 ; Cooley, Torts (3d ed.), 221.

1909Roth v. Shupp, 94 Md. 55, 50 Atl. 430 ; Farmer v. Crosby, 43 Minn. 459 , 45 N. W. 866 ; Cooley, Torts (3d ed.), 221.

11909–1909
Anderson v. May neutral
minn · 1892
2 sentences

1909Anderson v. May, 50 Minn. 280 , 52 N. W. 530, 36 Am.

1909Anderson v. May, 50 Minn. 280 , 52 N. W. 530, 36 Am.

11909–1909
McBeth v. State neutral
miss · 1874
1 sentence

1909State v. Seely, 30 Ark. 162 ; Jones v. State, 65 Ga. 147 ; Robinson v. Commonwealth, 88 Ky. 386 , 11 S. W. 210 ; Commonwealth v. Trainor, 123 Mass. 414 ; People v. Leong Quong, 60 Cal. 107 ; Reddick v. State, 25 Fla. 112, 433 , 5 South. 704 ; Vandermark v. People, 47 Ill. 122 ; Ehlert v. State, 93 Ind. 76 ; Bell v. State, 25 Tex. 575 ; State v. Johnson, 67 N. C. 55 ; McBeth v. State, 50 Miss. 81 ; State v. Bundy, 64 Me. 507 ; State v. Peterson, 70 Me. 216 .

11909–1909

Where else courts name it

NY 25 (1799–1976) PA 14 (1843–1980) CA 12 (1901–1975) MO 12 (1858–1986) NC 10 (1901–1950) TX 9 (1848–1958) CT 8 (1826–1992) WA 7 (1909–1961) IA 6 (1895–1909) MN 6 (1877–1964) CO 5 (1895–1946) MD 5 (1847–1970) FL 5 (1928–1962) IL 5 (1916–1979) OK 5 (1895–1963) NJ 4 (1845–1953) MI 4 (1908–1959) GA 3 (1907–1953) MA 3 (1907–2000) NE 3 (1928–1959) IN 3 (1875–1896) OH 3 (1878–1952) DE 2 (1893–1945) AZ 2 (1917–1937) AL 2 (1855–1882) ID 2 (1911–1925) MT 2 (1906–1913) TN 2 (1903–1953) KY 2 (1887–1924)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check