undoubted rule in Florida

1962We quite agree with the Supreme Court of California [Berka v. Woodward, 125 Cal. 119 , 57 P. 777 ], when It says: `This, then, is the undoubted rule, that, when a contract is expressly prohibited by law, no court of justice will entertain an action upon it, or upon any asserted rights growing out of it.

1962We quite agree with the Supreme Court of California [Berka v. Woodward, 125 Cal. 119 , 57 P. 777 ], when It says: `This, then, is the undoubted rule, that, when a contract is expressly prohibited by law, no court of justice will entertain an action upon it, or upon any asserted rights growing out of it.

1961There would be little use in the balance of the act prohibiting the contributions from race track owners, dog track owners, public utilities, and other interests considered undesirable proponents of a candidate in Florida unless the Legislature devised a way by which it could be ascertained by the people as to who were supporting and putting up the money for the candidate.'" The Supreme Court in Citizens' Bank & Trust Co. v. Mabry, 102 Fla. 1084 , 136 So. 714, 717 , said: "In Lassiter & Co. v. Taylor, 99 Fla. 819 , 128 So. 14, 19 , 69 A.L.R. 689 , in an opinion written by Mr. Commissioner Davi

1961There would be little use in the balance of the act prohibiting the contributions from race track owners, dog track owners, public utilities, and other interests considered undesirable proponents of a candidate in Florida unless the Legislature devised a way by which it could be ascertained by the people as to who were supporting and putting up the money for the candidate.'" The Supreme Court in Citizens' Bank & Trust Co. v. Mabry, 102 Fla. 1084 , 136 So. 714, 717 , said: "In Lassiter & Co. v. Taylor, 99 Fla. 819 , 128 So. 14, 19 , 69 A.L.R. 689 , in an opinion written by Mr. Commissioner Davi

1961There would be little use in the balance of the act prohibiting the contributions from race track owners, dog track owners, public utilities, and other interests considered undesirable proponents of a candidate in Florida unless the Legislature devised a way by which it could be ascertained by the people as to who were supporting and putting up the money for the candidate.'" The Supreme Court in Citizens' Bank & Trust Co. v. Mabry, 102 Fla. 1084 , 136 So. 714, 717 , said: "In Lassiter & Co. v. Taylor, 99 Fla. 819 , 128 So. 14, 19 , 69 A.L.R. 689 , in an opinion written by Mr. Commissioner Davi

1961There would be little use in the balance of the act prohibiting the contributions from race track owners, dog track owners, public utilities, and other interests considered undesirable proponents of a candidate in Florida unless the Legislature devised a way by which it could be ascertained by the people as to who were supporting and putting up the money for the candidate.'" The Supreme Court in Citizens' Bank & Trust Co. v. Mabry, 102 Fla. 1084 , 136 So. 714, 717 , said: "In Lassiter & Co. v. Taylor, 99 Fla. 819 , 128 So. 14, 19 , 69 A.L.R. 689 , in an opinion written by Mr. Commissioner Davi

1928But if the party actually knows that a judgment has been rendered against him, and the judgment is not simply and merely void, it is the undoubted rule that he must exercise reasonable diligence in procuring its vacation, and that his unexcused laches of delay, unduly protracted, will preclude him from obtaining the relief sought. ’ ’ *877 And in Einstein v. Davidson, stipm, it was said: “A judgment that is absolutely null and void — a mere brutum fulmen — can be set aside and stricken from the record on motion at any time, and may be collaterally assailed. ’ ’ The conclusions reached in this

1928But if the party actually knows that a judgment has been rendered against him, and the judgment is not simply and merely void, it is the undoubted rule that he must exercise reasonable diligence in procuring its vacation, and that his unexcused laches of delay, unduly protracted, will preclude him from obtaining the relief sought. ’ ’ *877 And in Einstein v. Davidson, stipm, it was said: “A judgment that is absolutely null and void — a mere brutum fulmen — can be set aside and stricken from the record on motion at any time, and may be collaterally assailed. ’ ’ The conclusions reached in this

1928But if the party actually knows that a judgment has been rendered against him, and the judgment is not simply and merely void, it is the undoubted rule that he must exercise reasonable diligence in procuring its vacation, and that his unexcused laches of delay, unduly protracted, will preclude him from obtaining the relief sought. ’ ’ *877 And in Einstein v. Davidson, stipm, it was said: “A judgment that is absolutely null and void — a mere brutum fulmen — can be set aside and stricken from the record on motion at any time, and may be collaterally assailed. ’ ’ The conclusions reached in this