Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Wisconsin opinions name it 1 courts 1986–2005 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Dischgreen2 sentences1986Disch again is clearly to the contrary: “[T]he defendant may challenge the test results on the basis of the lack of the authentication of a test sample, i.e., the chain of custody.” Id. at 471, 351 N.W.2d at 497 (emphasis added). 1986Disch again is clearly to the contrary: "[T]he defendant may challenge the test results on the basis of the lack of the authentication of a test sample, i.e., the chain of custody." Id. at 471, 351 N.W.2d at 497 (emphasis added). | 2 | 2 |
Schlumpf v. Yellickgreen2 sentences1991Schlumpf, 94 Wis. 2d at 510 , 288 N.W.2d at 838 . 1987Schlumpf v. Yellick, 94 Wis. 2d 504, 510 , 288 N.W.2d 834, 838 (1980). | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
City of La Crosse v. Shiftar Bros.
green
2 sentences2005Accordingly, it asserts that the authentication requirement of Wis. Stat. § 801.02 (1) must apply, citing City of La Crosse v. Shiftar Bros., Inc., 162 Wis. 2d 556 , 469 N.W.2d 915 (Ct. *128 App. 1991). 2005Accordingly, it asserts that the authentication requirement of Wis. Stat. § 801.02 (1) must apply, citing City of La Crosse v. Shiftar Bros., Inc., 162 Wis. 2d 556 , 469 N.W.2d 915 (Ct. *128 App. 1991). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
American Family Mutual Insurance v. Royal Insurance Co. of America
green
1 sentence1998Id. at 533-34, 481 N.W.2d at 632-33 . | 1 | 1998–1998 |
State Ex Rel. Clayton v. Wolke
neutral
2 sentences1991Clayton v. Wolke, 69 Wis. 2d 363 , 230 N.W.2d 869 (1975), the court concluded that a Louisiana governor's extradition request satisfied the authentication requirement of sec. 976.03(3), Stats. 1991Clayton v. Wolke, 69 Wis. 2d 363 , 230 N.W.2d 869 (1975), the court concluded that a Louisiana governor's extradition request satisfied the authentication requirement of sec. 976.03(3), Stats. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.