superintendent of public instruction (Wisconsin) · Go Syfert
← Wisconsin issues

superintendent of public instruction in Wisconsin

7 Wisconsin opinions name it 2 courts 1941–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Kristi Koschkee v. Carolyn Stanford Taylorgreen
wis · 2019 · cited in 4 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
2 sentences

2020Just last term we held that the superintendent of public instruction "has the executive constitutional function to supervise public instruction." Koschkee v. Taylor, 2019 WI 76, ¶¶2, 25-29 , 387 Wis. 2d 552 , 929 N.W.2d 600 .

2020Just last term we held that the superintendent of public instruction "has the executive constitutional function to supervise public instruction." Koschkee v. Taylor, 2019 WI 76, ¶¶2, 25-29 , 387 Wis. 2d 552 , 929 N.W.2d 600 .

44
State v. Blalockgreen
wisctapp · 1989 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
2 sentences

2016II ¶107 Second, I caution the reader that, like Thompson, the instant case "does not require us to decide the extent to which [the superintendent of public instruction's] powers may be reduced by the legislature . . . ."25 Thus our opinions should be read as "reserv[ing] judgment on that issue."26 ¶108 Nevertheless, the lead opinion and the dissents unnecessarily suggest that "the Legislature may give, may not give, and may take away the powers and duties of the 25 Thompson, 199 Wis. 2d at 699-700 . 26 Thompson, 199 Wis. 2d at 700 ; see also State v. Castillo, 213 Wis. 2d 488, ¶12 , 570 N.W.2d

2016II ¶107 Second, I caution the reader that, like Thompson, the instant case "does not require us to decide the extent to which [the superintendent of public instruction's] powers may be reduced by the legislature . . . ."25 Thus our opinions should be read as "reserv[ing] judgment on that issue."26 ¶108 Nevertheless, the lead opinion and the dissents unnecessarily suggest that "the Legislature may give, may not give, and may take away the powers and duties of the 25 Thompson, 199 Wis. 2d at 699-700 . 26 Thompson, 199 Wis. 2d at 700 ; see also State v. Castillo, 213 Wis. 2d 488, ¶12 , 570 N.W.2d

11
State v. Castillogreen
wis · 1997 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
2 sentences

2016II ¶107 Second, I caution the reader that, like Thompson, the instant case "does not require us to decide the extent to which [the superintendent of public instruction's] powers may be reduced by the legislature . . . ."25 Thus our opinions should be read as "reserv[ing] judgment on that issue."26 ¶108 Nevertheless, the lead opinion and the dissents unnecessarily suggest that "the Legislature may give, may not give, and may take away the powers and duties of the 25 Thompson, 199 Wis. 2d at 699-700 . 26 Thompson, 199 Wis. 2d at 700 ; see also State v. Castillo, 213 Wis. 2d 488, ¶12 , 570 N.W.2d

2016II ¶107 Second, I caution the reader that, like Thompson, the instant case "does not require us to decide the extent to which [the superintendent of public instruction's] powers may be reduced by the legislature . . . ."25 Thus our opinions should be read as "reserv[ing] judgment on that issue."26 ¶108 Nevertheless, the lead opinion and the dissents unnecessarily suggest that "the Legislature may give, may not give, and may take away the powers and duties of the 25 Thompson, 199 Wis. 2d at 699-700 . 26 Thompson, 199 Wis. 2d at 700 ; see also State v. Castillo, 213 Wis. 2d 488, ¶12 , 570 N.W.2d

11
Thompson v. Craneygreen
wis · 1996 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
2 sentences

2016The Legislature must vest the supervision of public instruction in officers over whom the SPI has "oversight and charge with the power of direction," or by definition he is no longer the superintendent of public instruction. 26 See Thompson, 199 Wis. 2d at 698-99 .

2016White, 15th abr. ed. 1838). 30 No. 2013AP416 longer the superintendent of public instruction.26 See Thompson, 199 Wis.2d at 698-99 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Board of Ed. of Central School Dist. No. 1 v. Allen green
scotus · 1968
1 sentence

1979Code Ann. sec. 331 7.06 (A) that fund expenditures be only for the purchase of "secular textbooks as have been approved by the superintendent of public instruction for use in public schools." The Ohio textbook loan program, to which 1979 AB 227 appears so similar, bore, the Supreme Court commented in Wolman , a striking resemblance to the systems upheld in Board of Education v. Allen , 392 U.S. 236 (1968) and Meek v. Pittenger , 421 U.S. 349 (1975).

11979–1979
Meek v. Pittenger red
scotus · 1975
1 sentence

1979Code Ann. sec. 331 7.06 (A) that fund expenditures be only for the purchase of "secular textbooks as have been approved by the superintendent of public instruction for use in public schools." The Ohio textbook loan program, to which 1979 AB 227 appears so similar, bore, the Supreme Court commented in Wolman , a striking resemblance to the systems upheld in Board of Education v. Allen , 392 U.S. 236 (1968) and Meek v. Pittenger , 421 U.S. 349 (1975).

11979–1979
State ex rel. Moreland v. Whitford green
wis · 1882
2 sentences

1941Moreland v. Whitford, 54 Wis. 150, 153-156 , 11 N. W. 424 ,— “The constitutional question as to whether such a jurisdiction could be constitutionally conferred upon this officer, is virtually disposed of by the above ruling that he is authorized to act only in a quasi-judicial capacity. . . .

1941Moreland v. Whitford, 54 Wis. 150, 153-156 , 11 N. W. 424 ,— “The constitutional question as to whether such a jurisdiction could be constitutionally conferred upon this officer, is virtually disposed of by the above ruling that he is authorized to act only in a quasi-judicial capacity. . . .

11941–1941

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WI § Wis. Stat. § 115.28 (5) WI § Wis. Stat. § 227.01 (5) WI § Wis. Stat. § 227.10 (5) WI § Wis. Stat. § 227.11 (5) WI § Wis. Stat. § 227.19 (5) WI § Wis. Stat. § 227.26 (5) WI § Wis. Stat. § 108.14 (4) WI § Wis. Stat. § 14.11 (4) WI § Wis. Stat. § 15.04 (4) WI § Wis. Stat. § 16.84 (4) WI § Wis. Stat. § 20.940 (4) WI § Wis. Stat. § 49.32 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

MI 21 (1886–2021) WA 10 (1909–2016) IA 10 (1895–2025) PA 7 (1901–1967) WI 7 (1941–2020) OH 7 (1997–2025) MT 7 (1896–1977) OK 6 (1918–1972) CA 5 (1923–2019) NV 5 (2003–2016) TX 5 (1914–1940) AZ 4 (1935–2016) ND 4 (1919–1988) NY 3 (1874–1910) IL 3 (1923–1973) KS 3 (1901–1947) KY 3 (1926–1933) IN 3 (1935–2008) NM 2 (1928–1960) NE 2 (1912–1939)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check