Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Montana opinions name it 1 courts 1896–1977 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Montana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Montana. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Montana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Peterson v. School Board
neutral
2 sentences1947Peterson v. School Board, 73 Mont. 442 , 236 Pac. 670 ; Kinzer v. Directors of Independent School District of Marion, 129 Iowa 441 , 105 N. W. 686 , 3 L. 1947Peterson v. School Board, 73 Mont. 442 , 236 Pac. 670 ; Kinzer v. Directors of Independent School District of Marion, 129 Iowa 441 , 105 N. W. 686 , 3 L. | 2 | 1929–1947 |
Kinzer v. Directors of Independent School District
green
2 sentences1947Peterson v. School Board, 73 Mont. 442 , 236 Pac. 670 ; Kinzer v. Directors of Independent School District of Marion, 129 Iowa 441 , 105 N. W. 686 , 3 L. 1947Peterson v. School Board, 73 Mont. 442 , 236 Pac. 670 ; Kinzer v. Directors of Independent School District of Marion, 129 Iowa 441 , 105 N. W. 686 , 3 L. | 2 | 1929–1947 |
Schweigert v. Board of Trustees of Evergreen School District 50
neutral
2 sentences1977Such proceedings shall be commenced no later than sixty (60) days after the date of the decision of the superintendent of public instruction.” (Emphasis provided.) In a recent case, Schweigert v. Board of Trustees, 163 Mont. 29 , 515 P.2d 85 , this Court held that where a tenured teacher did not follow statutory procedure in making a written request within ten days for a statement of reasons and a hearing, her rights under the statute expired and she was foreclosed from thereafter bringing suit challenging the decision not to renew her contract. 1977Such proceedings shall be commenced no later than sixty (60) days after the date of the decision of the superintendent of public instruction.” (Emphasis provided.) In a recent case, Schweigert v. Board of Trustees, 163 Mont. 29 , 515 P.2d 85 , this Court held that where a tenured teacher did not follow statutory procedure in making a written request within ten days for a statement of reasons and a hearing, her rights under the statute expired and she was foreclosed from thereafter bringing suit challenging the decision not to renew her contract. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Eastman v. School Dist. No. 1
green
2 sentences1973Eastman v. School District No. 1, 120 Mont. 63 , 180 P.2d 472 . 1973Eastman v. School District No. 1, 120 Mont. 63 , 180 P.2d 472 . | 1 | 1973–1973 |
State Ex Rel. Broadwater County v. Rosman
green
2 sentences1954Home State Bank v. Swartz, 72 Mont. 425 , 234 Pac. 281 ; State [for Use and Benefit of Broadwater County] v. Rosman, 84 Mont. [207], 274 Pac. 850 ." It is the duty of the county superintendent to hear such appeal, and the decision of such county superintendent therein *217 may be appealed to the superintendent of public instruction. 1954Home State Bank v. Swartz, 72 Mont. 425 , 234 Pac. 281 ; State [for Use and Benefit of Broadwater County] v. Rosman, 84 Mont. [207], 274 Pac. 850 .” It is the duty of the county superintendent to hear such appeal, and the decision of such county superintendent therein may be appealed to the superintendent of public instruction. | 1 | 1954–1954 |
Home State Bank v. Swartz
neutral
2 sentences1954Home State Bank v. Swartz, 72 Mont. 425 , 234 Pac. 281 ; State [for Use and Benefit of Broadwater County] v. Rosman, 84 Mont. [207], 274 Pac. 850 .” It is the duty of the county superintendent to hear such appeal, and the decision of such county superintendent therein may be appealed to the superintendent of public instruction. 1954Home State Bank v. Swartz, 72 Mont. 425 , 234 Pac. 281 ; State [for Use and Benefit of Broadwater County] v. Rosman, 84 Mont. [207], 274 Pac. 850 .” It is the duty of the county superintendent to hear such appeal, and the decision of such county superintendent therein may be appealed to the superintendent of public instruction. | 1 | 1954–1954 |
Donna Independent School Dist. v. First State Bank of Donna
green
1 sentence1925Thus, in School District v. Bank (Tex. Civ.), 227 S. W. 974 , the Court of Civil Appeals of Texas said: “There is no allegation in the application for mandamus that appellees had exhausted their remedy of appeal to the superintendent of public instruction, which is given by Article 4510, Eevised Statutes. | 1 | 1925–1925 |
State ex rel. Andrew v. Webber
green
2 sentences1896Under section 1797, Political Code, the board of trustees have power ‘ ‘ to prescribe and enforce rules not inconsistent with law, or those prescribed by the superintendent of public instruction, for their own government of schools under their supervision.” In State v. Webber, 108 Ind. 31 , 8 N. E. 708 , a case involving questions similar to the one at bar, it was held, in the absence of any statute expressly granting the trustees or any one else authority to prescribe what books should be used, that the superintendent of the district school, with the sanction of the trustees, might require, a 1896Under section 1797, Political Code, the board of trustees have power ‘ ‘ to prescribe and enforce rules not inconsistent with law, or those prescribed by the superintendent of public instruction, for their own government of schools under their supervision.” In State v. Webber, 108 Ind. 31 , 8 N. E. 708 , a case involving questions similar to the one at bar, it was held, in the absence of any statute expressly granting the trustees or any one else authority to prescribe what books should be used, that the superintendent of the district school, with the sanction of the trustees, might require, a | 1 | 1896–1896 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.