Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 California opinions name it 3 courts 1923–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Butt v. State of Californiagreen2 sentences2019It has long been clear that these separation-of-powers principles limit judicial authority over appropriations. [Citations.]" ( Butt v. State of California (1992) 4 Cal.4th 668 , 698, 15 Cal.Rptr.2d 480 , 842 P.2d 1240 ( Butt ).) For example, in Butt , supra , 4 Cal.4th 668 , 15 Cal.Rptr.2d 480 , 842 P.2d 1240 , relied upon by the trial court in declining to issue the writ sought by plaintiffs, after a school district announced it lacked funds to complete the final six weeks of the school year, *1021 the trial court issued a preliminary injunction directing the State of *550 California (State) 2019It has long been clear that these separation-of-powers principles limit judicial authority over appropriations. [Citations.]" ( Butt v. State of California (1992) 4 Cal.4th 668 , 698, 15 Cal.Rptr.2d 480 , 842 P.2d 1240 ( Butt ).) For example, in Butt , supra , 4 Cal.4th 668 , 15 Cal.Rptr.2d 480 , 842 P.2d 1240 , relied upon by the trial court in declining to issue the writ sought by plaintiffs, after a school district announced it lacked funds to complete the final six weeks of the school year, *1021 the trial court issued a preliminary injunction directing the State of *550 California (State) | 2 | 4 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Mandel v. Myers
green
2 sentences2019Affirming the trial court's determination that "the State has a constitutional duty ... to prevent the budgetary problems of a particular school district from depriving its students of 'basic' educational equality," and that the trial court did not err in concluding fulfillment of this duty "demanded immediate State intervention," our Supreme Court concluded the trial court lacked the authority to approve the "diversion of emergency loan funds from appropriations clearly intended by the Legislature for other purposes." ( Id . at pp. 673-674, 15 Cal.Rptr.2d 480 , 842 P.2d 1240 .) In reaching th 2019Affirming the trial court's determination that "the State has a constitutional duty ... to prevent the budgetary problems of a particular school district from depriving its students of 'basic' educational equality," and that the trial court did not err in concluding fulfillment of this duty "demanded immediate State intervention," our Supreme Court concluded the trial court lacked the authority to approve the "diversion of emergency loan funds from appropriations clearly intended by the Legislature for other purposes." ( Id . at pp. 673-674, 15 Cal.Rptr.2d 480 , 842 P.2d 1240 .) In reaching th | 4 | 2018–2019 |
Fairfield v. Foster
green
1 sentence1923Petitioner contends at some length in a supplemental memorandum, discussing Fairfield v. Foster, supra, that if the Governor vetoed the item in subdivision 4 on the theory that it was in fact an appropriation of one per cent of the total amount provided for the state schools and special colleges, it would follow that such appropriation for the state schools would be decreased to ninety-nine per cent of the aggregate amount provided by the legislature. | 1 | 1923–1923 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.