6 Alaska opinions name it 1 courts 1984–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alaska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Price v. Easthamgreen1 sentence2017Price v. Eastham, 128 P.3d 725, 731-32 (Alaska 2006). -6- 1642 Finally, Giocondo invokes a federal rule providing for tolling “where the plaintiff, by exercising reasonable diligence, could not have discovered essential information bearing on his or her claim.”16 As we have previously noted, “Alaska recognizes this principle in its discovery rule.”17 The discovery rule, however, is not a tolling doctrine, but rather a means for specifying when a claim “accrues,” i.e., when the statute of limitations starts running.18 Giocondo admitted in superior court that the statute of limitations started r | 1 | 1 |
Patrick v. Lynden Transport, Inc.green1 sentence2007Article I, section 7 of the Alaska Constitution provides: "No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." [14] Patrick v. Lynden Transport, Inc., 765 P.2d 1375, 1379 (Alaska 1988). [15] Varilek, 104 P.3d at 853-55 . [16] 516 P.2d at 1221 . [17] 967 P.2d 91 , 96 (Alaska 1998). [18] See, e.g., Hanson v. Kake Tribal Corp., 939 P.2d 1320 (Alaska 1997) (holding that the tolling provision applies to claims of minor stockholders whose shares are held by adult custodians); see also Grober v. State, Dep't of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Div., ex rel C.J.W. | 1 | 1 |
Hanson v. Kake Tribal Corp.green2 sentences2007Article I, section 7 of the Alaska Constitution provides: "No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." [14] Patrick v. Lynden Transport, Inc., 765 P.2d 1375, 1379 (Alaska 1988). [15] Varilek, 104 P.3d at 853-55 . [16] 516 P.2d at 1221 . [17] 967 P.2d 91 , 96 (Alaska 1998). [18] See, e.g., Hanson v. Kake Tribal Corp., 939 P.2d 1320 (Alaska 1997) (holding that the tolling provision applies to claims of minor stockholders whose shares are held by adult custodians); see also Grober v. State, Dep't of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Div., ex rel C.J.W. 2007Article I, section 7 of the Alaska Constitution provides: "No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." [14] Patrick v. Lynden Transport, Inc., 765 P.2d 1375, 1379 (Alaska 1988). [15] Varilek, 104 P.3d at 853-55 . [16] 516 P.2d at 1221 . [17] 967 P.2d 91 , 96 (Alaska 1998). [18] See, e.g., Hanson v. Kake Tribal Corp., 939 P.2d 1320 (Alaska 1997) (holding that the tolling provision applies to claims of minor stockholders whose shares are held by adult custodians); see also Grober v. State, Dep't of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Div., ex rel C.J.W. | 1 | 1 |
Barrio v. San Manuel Division Hospital for Magma Copper Co.green2 sentences2007Article I, section 7 of the Alaska Constitution provides: "No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." [14] Patrick v. Lynden Transport, Inc., 765 P.2d 1375, 1379 (Alaska 1988). [15] Varilek, 104 P.3d at 853-55 . [16] 516 P.2d at 1221 . [17] 967 P.2d 91 , 96 (Alaska 1998). [18] See, e.g., Hanson v. Kake Tribal Corp., 939 P.2d 1320 (Alaska 1997) (holding that the tolling provision applies to claims of minor stockholders whose shares are held by adult custodians); see also Grober v. State, Dep't of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Div., ex rel C.J.W. 2007Article I, section 7 of the Alaska Constitution provides: "No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." [14] Patrick v. Lynden Transport, Inc., 765 P.2d 1375, 1379 (Alaska 1988). [15] Varilek, 104 P.3d at 853-55 . [16] 516 P.2d at 1221 . [17] 967 P.2d 91 , 96 (Alaska 1998). [18] See, e.g., Hanson v. Kake Tribal Corp., 939 P.2d 1320 (Alaska 1997) (holding that the tolling provision applies to claims of minor stockholders whose shares are held by adult custodians); see also Grober v. State, Dep't of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Div., ex rel C.J.W. | 1 | 1 |
Sax v. Vottelergreen1 sentence2007Article I, section 7 of the Alaska Constitution provides: "No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." [14] Patrick v. Lynden Transport, Inc., 765 P.2d 1375, 1379 (Alaska 1988). [15] Varilek, 104 P.3d at 853-55 . [16] 516 P.2d at 1221 . [17] 967 P.2d 91 , 96 (Alaska 1998). [18] See, e.g., Hanson v. Kake Tribal Corp., 939 P.2d 1320 (Alaska 1997) (holding that the tolling provision applies to claims of minor stockholders whose shares are held by adult custodians); see also Grober v. State, Dep't of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Div., ex rel C.J.W. | 1 | 1 |
Lee v. Gaufingreen1 sentence2007Article I, section 7 of the Alaska Constitution provides: "No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." [14] Patrick v. Lynden Transport, Inc., 765 P.2d 1375, 1379 (Alaska 1988). [15] Varilek, 104 P.3d at 853-55 . [16] 516 P.2d at 1221 . [17] 967 P.2d 91 , 96 (Alaska 1998). [18] See, e.g., Hanson v. Kake Tribal Corp., 939 P.2d 1320 (Alaska 1997) (holding that the tolling provision applies to claims of minor stockholders whose shares are held by adult custodians); see also Grober v. State, Dep't of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Div., ex rel C.J.W. | 1 | 1 |
Grober v. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division Ex Rel. C.J.W.green1 sentence2007Article I, section 7 of the Alaska Constitution provides: "No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." [14] Patrick v. Lynden Transport, Inc., 765 P.2d 1375, 1379 (Alaska 1988). [15] Varilek, 104 P.3d at 853-55 . [16] 516 P.2d at 1221 . [17] 967 P.2d 91 , 96 (Alaska 1998). [18] See, e.g., Hanson v. Kake Tribal Corp., 939 P.2d 1320 (Alaska 1997) (holding that the tolling provision applies to claims of minor stockholders whose shares are held by adult custodians); see also Grober v. State, Dep't of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Div., ex rel C.J.W. | 1 | 1 |
Mominee v. Scherbarthgreen2 sentences2007Luke's Hosp., 706 S.W.2d 7, 10 (Mo.1986). [26] Barrio, 692 P.2d at 286 (concluding that the medical malpractice statute of limitations violated minors' state constitutional right to recover damages for an injury). [27] Mominee v. Scherbarth, 28 Ohio St.3d 270 , 503 N.E.2d 717, 723 (1986) (concluding that the medical malpractice statute of limitations as applied to minors violated the state constitution's open-courts guarantee). [28] Strahler, 706 S.W.2d at 12 (concluding that the medical malpractice statute of limitations was "too severe an interference with a minor['s] state constitutionally 2007Luke's Hosp., 706 S.W.2d 7, 10 (Mo.1986). [26] Barrio, 692 P.2d at 286 (concluding that the medical malpractice statute of limitations violated minors' state constitutional right to recover damages for an injury). [27] Mominee v. Scherbarth, 28 Ohio St.3d 270 , 503 N.E.2d 717, 723 (1986) (concluding that the medical malpractice statute of limitations as applied to minors violated the state constitution's open-courts guarantee). [28] Strahler, 706 S.W.2d at 12 (concluding that the medical malpractice statute of limitations was "too severe an interference with a minor['s] state constitutionally | 1 | 1 |
Evans Ex Rel. Kutch v. Stategreen1 sentence2007Article I, section 7 of the Alaska Constitution provides: "No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." [14] Patrick v. Lynden Transport, Inc., 765 P.2d 1375, 1379 (Alaska 1988). [15] Varilek, 104 P.3d at 853-55 . [16] 516 P.2d at 1221 . [17] 967 P.2d 91 , 96 (Alaska 1998). [18] See, e.g., Hanson v. Kake Tribal Corp., 939 P.2d 1320 (Alaska 1997) (holding that the tolling provision applies to claims of minor stockholders whose shares are held by adult custodians); see also Grober v. State, Dep't of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Div., ex rel C.J.W. | 1 | 1 |
Strahler v. St. Luke's Hospitalgreen2 sentences2007Luke's Hosp., 706 S.W.2d 7, 10 (Mo.1986). [26] Barrio, 692 P.2d at 286 (concluding that the medical malpractice statute of limitations violated minors' state constitutional right to recover damages for an injury). [27] Mominee v. Scherbarth, 28 Ohio St.3d 270 , 503 N.E.2d 717, 723 (1986) (concluding that the medical malpractice statute of limitations as applied to minors violated the state constitution's open-courts guarantee). [28] Strahler, 706 S.W.2d at 12 (concluding that the medical malpractice statute of limitations was "too severe an interference with a minor['s] state constitutionally 2007Luke's Hosp., 706 S.W.2d 7, 10 (Mo.1986). [26] Barrio, 692 P.2d at 286 (concluding that the medical malpractice statute of limitations violated minors' state constitutional right to recover damages for an injury). [27] Mominee v. Scherbarth, 28 Ohio St.3d 270 , 503 N.E.2d 717, 723 (1986) (concluding that the medical malpractice statute of limitations as applied to minors violated the state constitution's open-courts guarantee). [28] Strahler, 706 S.W.2d at 12 (concluding that the medical malpractice statute of limitations was "too severe an interference with a minor['s] state constitutionally | 1 | 1 |
Byrne v. Oglegreen1 sentence1998Statutes of limitations, on the other hand, “encourage promptness in the prosecution of actions and thus avoid the injustice which may result from prosecution of stale claims.” Byrne v. Ogle, 488 P.2d 716, 718 (Alaska 1971). | 1 | 1 |
Greater Area Inc. v. Bookmangreen1 sentence1988See Gudenau & Co. v. Sweeney Ins., 736 P.2d 763, 766-67 (Alaska 1987); Greater Area Inc. v. Bookman, 657 P.2d 828, 829-30 (Alaska 1982). | 1 | 1 |
Gudenau & Co., Inc. v. Sweeney Ins., Inc.green1 sentence1988See Gudenau & Co. v. Sweeney Ins., 736 P.2d 763, 766-67 (Alaska 1987); Greater Area Inc. v. Bookman, 657 P.2d 828, 829-30 (Alaska 1982). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alaska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Matter of KAH
green
1 sentence2007Article I, section 7 of the Alaska Constitution provides: "No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." [14] Patrick v. Lynden Transport, Inc., 765 P.2d 1375, 1379 (Alaska 1988). [15] Varilek, 104 P.3d at 853-55 . [16] 516 P.2d at 1221 . [17] 967 P.2d 91 , 96 (Alaska 1998). [18] See, e.g., Hanson v. Kake Tribal Corp., 939 P.2d 1320 (Alaska 1997) (holding that the tolling provision applies to claims of minor stockholders whose shares are held by adult custodians); see also Grober v. State, Dep't of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Div., ex rel C.J.W. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Bush v. Reid
green
1 sentence2007Article I, section 7 of the Alaska Constitution provides: "No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." [14] Patrick v. Lynden Transport, Inc., 765 P.2d 1375, 1379 (Alaska 1988). [15] Varilek, 104 P.3d at 853-55 . [16] 516 P.2d at 1221 . [17] 967 P.2d 91 , 96 (Alaska 1998). [18] See, e.g., Hanson v. Kake Tribal Corp., 939 P.2d 1320 (Alaska 1997) (holding that the tolling provision applies to claims of minor stockholders whose shares are held by adult custodians); see also Grober v. State, Dep't of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Div., ex rel C.J.W. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Varilek v. City of Houston
green
1 sentence2007Article I, section 7 of the Alaska Constitution provides: "No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." [14] Patrick v. Lynden Transport, Inc., 765 P.2d 1375, 1379 (Alaska 1988). [15] Varilek, 104 P.3d at 853-55 . [16] 516 P.2d at 1221 . [17] 967 P.2d 91 , 96 (Alaska 1998). [18] See, e.g., Hanson v. Kake Tribal Corp., 939 P.2d 1320 (Alaska 1997) (holding that the tolling provision applies to claims of minor stockholders whose shares are held by adult custodians); see also Grober v. State, Dep't of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Div., ex rel C.J.W. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. Parker
green
2 sentences1998This would engender a “needless multiplicity of actions — precisely the situation that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 and the tolling rule of American Pipe were designed to avoid.” Crown, Cork, 462 U.S. at 351 , 103 S.Ct. 2392 . 1998This would engender a “needless multiplicity of actions — precisely the situation that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 and the tolling rule of American Pipe were designed to avoid.” Crown, Cork, 462 U.S. at 351 , 103 S.Ct. 2392 . | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Fields v. Fairbanks North Star Borough
green
2 sentences1997E.g., Fields v. Fairbanks North Star Borough, 818 P.2d 658 (Alaska 1991). 1997E.g., Fields v. Fairbanks North Star Borough, 818 P.2d 658 (Alaska 1991). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Haakanson v. Wakefield Seafoods, Inc.
green
2 sentences1984We stated that there was "no legislative intent to treat [an action for wrongful death] differently than the common law tort action," 600 P.2d at 1092 , and noted our agreement, in spirit, with cases which "interpret the action as any other tort action and apply the general procedural statutes of limitations and the exceptions for disability." [10] Id. at 1091-92 . 1984We stated that there was "no legislative intent to treat [an action for wrongful death] differently than the common law tort action," 600 P.2d at 1092 , and noted our agreement, in spirit, with cases which "interpret the action as any other tort action and apply the general procedural statutes of limitations and the exceptions for disability." [10] Id. at 1091-92 . | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.