tolling rule (Iowa) · Go Syfert
← Iowa issues

tolling rule in Iowa

5 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 2011–2024 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Cook v. City of Council Bluffsgreen
iowa · 1978 · cited in 2 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
2 sentences

2024He failed to act with the prudence and diligence required to trigger the tolling rule, see Cook, 264 N.W.2d at 787 , making the notice of appeal filed in district court untimely.

2024He failed to act with the prudence and diligence required to trigger the tolling rule, see Cook, 264 N.W.2d at 787 , making the notice of appeal filed in district court untimely.

22
Meier v. SENECAUT IIIgreen
iowa · 2002 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
1 sentence

2015P. 1.981(3).1 In its view, this language sets forth a “special rule” allowing application of the tolling exception to a situation “where the Court was not making findings of fact without a jury.” See Meier v. Senecaut, 641 N.W.2d 532, 538 (Iowa 2002) (stating “absent the application of a special rule, a [rule 1.904(2)] motion is not available to challenge a ruling that did not involve a factual issue but instead was confined to the determination of a legal question” (emphasis added) (citing Explore Info.

11
State of Iowa v. Thomas Edward Olsengreen
iowa · 2011 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
1 sentence

2013State v. Olsen, 794 N.W.2d 285, 288-89 (Iowa 2011).

11
Borchard v. Andersongreen
iowa · 1996 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
1 sentence

2011See Borchard, 542 N.W.2d at 251 n. 2.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Statutes the citing opinions construe

IA § Iowa Code § 17A.19 (3) IA § Iowa Code § 17A.9 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CA 69 (1974–2025) TX 60 (1992–2026) DE 24 (2009–2026) FL 17 (1986–2026) MD 15 (2005–2025) NY 14 (1990–2024) IL 12 (1993–2015) TN 11 (1998–2025) WI 11 (1988–2025) MI 9 (1976–2023) GA 9 (2006–2025) OK 7 (1959–2024) MA 7 (1988–2025) OH 7 (1978–2022) AK 6 (1984–2017) PA 6 (1985–1992) NJ 6 (1978–2025) DC 6 (1991–2000) NM 6 (1978–2025) CT 6 (1997–2019) NV 5 (2012–2019) IA 5 (2011–2024) IN 4 (1994–2015) WA 4 (1999–2023) AZ 4 (1996–2020) OR 4 (1997–2024) LA 3 (2010–2021) KY 3 (2009–2022) ID 3 (1993–2009) KS 3 (1984–2012) ME 3 (2010–2019) UT 3 (1999–2018) VA 2 (2017–2024) MT 2 (2014–2014) MN 2 (1984–2026) WV 2 (1997–2019) HI 2 (1998–2015) VT 2 (2005–2012) VI 2 (2000–2017)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check