Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Alabama opinions name it 1 courts 1999–2003 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Green Tree Financial Corporatoin v. Wamplergreen2 sentences2003Corp. v. Wampler, 749 So.2d 409, 413, 415 (Ala.1999), and citing Ex parte Napier, 723 So.2d 49 (Ala.1998)); Ex parte Dan Tucker Auto Sales, Inc., 718 So.2d at 41 (Lyons, J., concurring specially). 2001Corp. v. Wampler, 749 So.2d 409, 413 (Ala.1999). | 3 | 3 |
Ex Parte Dan Tucker Auto Sales, Inc.green1 sentence2003Corp. v. Wampler, 749 So.2d 409, 413, 415 (Ala.1999), and citing Ex parte Napier, 723 So.2d 49 (Ala.1998)); Ex parte Dan Tucker Auto Sales, Inc., 718 So.2d at 41 (Lyons, J., concurring specially). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ex Parte Palm Harbor Homes, Inc.
green
2 sentences2003In determining which arbitration provision controlled, this Court held that the merger clause in the retail contract established that the retail contract represented the entire agreement between the parties and superseded the freestanding arbitration agreements. 798 So.2d at 660-62 . 2003This Court held that the merger clause in the security agreement made it the entire agreement between the parties and worked to extinguish the freestanding arbitration documents. 798 So.2d at 660-62 . | 2 | 2003–2003 |
Ex Parte Napier
green
1 sentence2003Corp. v. Wampler, 749 So.2d 409, 413, 415 (Ala.1999), and citing Ex parte Napier, 723 So.2d 49 (Ala.1998)); Ex parte Dan Tucker Auto Sales, Inc., 718 So.2d at 41 (Lyons, J., concurring specially). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
American General Finance, Inc. v. Branch
green
2 sentences2001However, as this Court explained in American General Finance, Inc. v. Branch, 793 So.2d 738 (Ala.2000), issues concerning the validity of arbitration clauses are to be decided by the court: "Nevertheless, `a determination that, by the terms of the arbitration clause, the arbitrator is to decide issues of arbitrability does not end the inquiry.' Green Tree Fin. 2001However, as this Court explained in American General Finance, Inc. v. Branch, 793 So.2d 738 (Ala.2000), issues concerning the validity of arbitration clauses are to be decided by the court: "Nevertheless, `a determination that, by the terms of the arbitration clause, the arbitrator is to decide issues of arbitrability does not end the inquiry.' Green Tree Fin. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Investment Management & Research, Inc. v. Hamilton
green
1 sentence1999The terms of the arbitration clause in the Security Agreement entered into by the Wamplers call for arbitration of "all disputes, claims or controversies arising from or relating to this contract or the *Page 414 parties thereto." The arbitration clause further provides that "all disputes arising under case law, statutory law and all other laws including, but not limited to, all contract, tort and property disputes will be subject to binding arbitration in accord with this contract." Compare the phrase "any controversy . . . with respect to this agreement," from the arbitration agreement in In | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.