implied findings and presume doctrine (California) · Go Syfert
← California issues

implied findings and presume doctrine in California

6 California opinions name it 1 courts 2015–2026 4 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
Acquire II, Ltd. v. Colton Real Estate Groupgreen
calctapp · 2013 · cited in 5 California opinions naming this issue, 2015–2025
2 sentences

2025The court shall issue a statement of decision explaining the factual and legal basis for its decision as to each of the principal controverted issues at trial upon the request of any party appearing at the trial.” For proceedings concluded in less than one calendar day, the statement of decision does not need to be in writing but “may be made orally on the record in the presence of the parties.” (§ 632.) 14 (Acquire); accord, Nellie Gail Ranch Owners Assn. v. McMullin (2016) 4 Cal.App.5th 982, 996 .) Further, we apply “the doctrine of implied findings and presume[ ] the trial court made all ne

2024(Acquire II, Ltd. v. Colton Real Estate Group (2013) 213 Cal.App.4th 959, 970 (Acquire II) [a party who “fail[s] to request a statement of decision when one is available . . . waives any objection to the trial court’s failure to make all findings necessary to support its decision”].) By not requesting a statement of decision, appellants also compel us to “appl[y] the doctrine of implied findings and presume[] the trial court made all necessary findings supported 10 by substantial evidence.” (Acquire II, supra, 213 Cal.App.4th at p. 970 .) “The question then becomes whether substantial evidence

35
Carbajal v. CWPSC, Inc.green
calctapp · 2016 · cited in 1 California opinions naming this issue, 2026–2026
1 sentence

2026The “Summary of the LLC Agreement” 3 Though the trial court did not mention adhesion in its ruling, defendants failed to request a statement of decision and so we apply “the doctrine of implied findings and presume[] the trial court made all necessary findings supported by substantial evidence.” (Carbajal v. CWPSC, Inc. (2016) 245 Cal.App.4th 227, 237 [doctrine applies to arbitration rulings].) Plaintiffs did assert below the agreements were adhesive. 7 in the Private Placement Memorandum did not mention arbitration.

11
Nellie Gail Ranch Owners Ass'n v. McMullingreen
calctapp · 2016 · cited in 1 California opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
1 sentence

2025The court shall issue a statement of decision explaining the factual and legal basis for its decision as to each of the principal controverted issues at trial upon the request of any party appearing at the trial.” For proceedings concluded in less than one calendar day, the statement of decision does not need to be in writing but “may be made orally on the record in the presence of the parties.” (§ 632.) 14 (Acquire); accord, Nellie Gail Ranch Owners Assn. v. McMullin (2016) 4 Cal.App.5th 982, 996 .) Further, we apply “the doctrine of implied findings and presume[ ] the trial court made all ne

11
Brewer v. Federicigreen
calctapp · 2001 · cited in 1 California opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
2 sentences

2025“Marriage creates a fiduciary relationship between spouses.” (Brewer v. Federici (2001) 93 Cal.App.4th 1334, 1342 (Brewer), citing §§ 721, subd. (b), 1100, subd. (e), 2102.) “The confidential relationship between spouses ‘imposes a duty of the highest good faith and fair dealing,’” including the obligation for each spouse to “make full and accurate disclosure and account for separate and community property.” (Brewer, supra, 93 Cal.App.4th at p. 1342 , citing §§ 2100, subds. (b) & (c), 2102-2105.) The duty of disclosure “includes the obligation to make full disclosure to the other spouse of all

2025“Marriage creates a fiduciary relationship between spouses.” (Brewer v. Federici (2001) 93 Cal.App.4th 1334, 1342 (Brewer), citing §§ 721, subd. (b), 1100, subd. (e), 2102.) “The confidential relationship between spouses ‘imposes a duty of the highest good faith and fair dealing,’” including the obligation for each spouse to “make full and accurate disclosure and account for separate and community property.” (Brewer, supra, 93 Cal.App.4th at p. 1342 , citing §§ 2100, subds. (b) & (c), 2102-2105.) The duty of disclosure “includes the obligation to make full disclosure to the other spouse of all

11
Associated Vendors, Inc. v. Oakland Meat Co.green
calctapp · 1962 · cited in 1 California opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024(Associated Vendors, supra, at p. 840 [generally, where alter ego has been found, “several of the[se] factors . . . were present”].) B.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Kington v. Fong green
calctapp · 2011
1 sentence

2025The court shall issue a statement of decision explaining the factual and legal basis for its decision as to each of the principal controverted issues at trial upon the request of any party appearing at the trial.” For proceedings concluded in less than one calendar day, the statement of decision does not need to be in writing but “may be made orally on the record in the presence of the parties.” (§ 632.) 14 (Acquire); accord, Nellie Gail Ranch Owners Assn. v. McMullin (2016) 4 Cal.App.5th 982, 996 .) Further, we apply “the doctrine of implied findings and presume[ ] the trial court made all ne

12025–2025
Fladeboe v. American Isuzu Motors Inc. green
calctapp · 2007
1 sentence

2024(Acquire II, Ltd. v. Colton Real Estate Group (2013) 213 Cal.App.4th 959, 970 (Acquire II) [a party who “fail[s] to request a statement of decision when one is available . . . waives any objection to the trial court’s failure to make all findings necessary to support its decision”].) By not requesting a statement of decision, appellants also compel us to “appl[y] the doctrine of implied findings and presume[] the trial court made all necessary findings supported 10 by substantial evidence.” (Acquire II, supra, 213 Cal.App.4th at p. 970 .) “The question then becomes whether substantial evidence

12024–2024

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check