Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 California opinions name it 1 courts 2015–2026 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Acquire II, Ltd. v. Colton Real Estate Groupgreen2 sentences2025The court shall issue a statement of decision explaining the factual and legal basis for its decision as to each of the principal controverted issues at trial upon the request of any party appearing at the trial.” For proceedings concluded in less than one calendar day, the statement of decision does not need to be in writing but “may be made orally on the record in the presence of the parties.” (§ 632.) 14 (Acquire); accord, Nellie Gail Ranch Owners Assn. v. McMullin (2016) 4 Cal.App.5th 982, 996 .) Further, we apply “the doctrine of implied findings and presume[ ] the trial court made all ne 2024(Acquire II, Ltd. v. Colton Real Estate Group (2013) 213 Cal.App.4th 959, 970 (Acquire II) [a party who “fail[s] to request a statement of decision when one is available . . . waives any objection to the trial court’s failure to make all findings necessary to support its decision”].) By not requesting a statement of decision, appellants also compel us to “appl[y] the doctrine of implied findings and presume[] the trial court made all necessary findings supported 10 by substantial evidence.” (Acquire II, supra, 213 Cal.App.4th at p. 970 .) “The question then becomes whether substantial evidence | 3 | 5 |
Carbajal v. CWPSC, Inc.green1 sentence2026The “Summary of the LLC Agreement” 3 Though the trial court did not mention adhesion in its ruling, defendants failed to request a statement of decision and so we apply “the doctrine of implied findings and presume[] the trial court made all necessary findings supported by substantial evidence.” (Carbajal v. CWPSC, Inc. (2016) 245 Cal.App.4th 227, 237 [doctrine applies to arbitration rulings].) Plaintiffs did assert below the agreements were adhesive. 7 in the Private Placement Memorandum did not mention arbitration. | 1 | 1 |
Nellie Gail Ranch Owners Ass'n v. McMullingreen1 sentence2025The court shall issue a statement of decision explaining the factual and legal basis for its decision as to each of the principal controverted issues at trial upon the request of any party appearing at the trial.” For proceedings concluded in less than one calendar day, the statement of decision does not need to be in writing but “may be made orally on the record in the presence of the parties.” (§ 632.) 14 (Acquire); accord, Nellie Gail Ranch Owners Assn. v. McMullin (2016) 4 Cal.App.5th 982, 996 .) Further, we apply “the doctrine of implied findings and presume[ ] the trial court made all ne | 1 | 1 |
Brewer v. Federicigreen2 sentences2025“Marriage creates a fiduciary relationship between spouses.” (Brewer v. Federici (2001) 93 Cal.App.4th 1334, 1342 (Brewer), citing §§ 721, subd. (b), 1100, subd. (e), 2102.) “The confidential relationship between spouses ‘imposes a duty of the highest good faith and fair dealing,’” including the obligation for each spouse to “make full and accurate disclosure and account for separate and community property.” (Brewer, supra, 93 Cal.App.4th at p. 1342 , citing §§ 2100, subds. (b) & (c), 2102-2105.) The duty of disclosure “includes the obligation to make full disclosure to the other spouse of all 2025“Marriage creates a fiduciary relationship between spouses.” (Brewer v. Federici (2001) 93 Cal.App.4th 1334, 1342 (Brewer), citing §§ 721, subd. (b), 1100, subd. (e), 2102.) “The confidential relationship between spouses ‘imposes a duty of the highest good faith and fair dealing,’” including the obligation for each spouse to “make full and accurate disclosure and account for separate and community property.” (Brewer, supra, 93 Cal.App.4th at p. 1342 , citing §§ 2100, subds. (b) & (c), 2102-2105.) The duty of disclosure “includes the obligation to make full disclosure to the other spouse of all | 1 | 1 |
Associated Vendors, Inc. v. Oakland Meat Co.green1 sentence2024(Associated Vendors, supra, at p. 840 [generally, where alter ego has been found, “several of the[se] factors . . . were present”].) B. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kington v. Fong
green
1 sentence2025The court shall issue a statement of decision explaining the factual and legal basis for its decision as to each of the principal controverted issues at trial upon the request of any party appearing at the trial.” For proceedings concluded in less than one calendar day, the statement of decision does not need to be in writing but “may be made orally on the record in the presence of the parties.” (§ 632.) 14 (Acquire); accord, Nellie Gail Ranch Owners Assn. v. McMullin (2016) 4 Cal.App.5th 982, 996 .) Further, we apply “the doctrine of implied findings and presume[ ] the trial court made all ne | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Fladeboe v. American Isuzu Motors Inc.
green
1 sentence2024(Acquire II, Ltd. v. Colton Real Estate Group (2013) 213 Cal.App.4th 959, 970 (Acquire II) [a party who “fail[s] to request a statement of decision when one is available . . . waives any objection to the trial court’s failure to make all findings necessary to support its decision”].) By not requesting a statement of decision, appellants also compel us to “appl[y] the doctrine of implied findings and presume[] the trial court made all necessary findings supported 10 by substantial evidence.” (Acquire II, supra, 213 Cal.App.4th at p. 970 .) “The question then becomes whether substantial evidence | 1 | 2024–2024 |