Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 California opinions name it 2 courts 1877–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Capuccio v. Cairegreen2 sentences2017Our Supreme Court has spoken on this issue directly, holding that under former section 796, the predecessor to the current partition cost statute, "counsel fees may be allowed ... for services rendered for the common benefit even in contested partition suits." ( Capuccio v. Caire (1932) 215 Cal. 518 , 528-529, 11 P.2d 1097 ( Capuccio ).) In Capuccio , a defendant argued "that the services performed by plaintiff's counsel in connection with the many controverted issues presented by the partition litigation" were not " 'for the common benefit.' " ( Id. at p. 528, 11 P.2d 1097 .) The Supreme Cour 2017Our Supreme Court has spoken on this issue directly, holding that under former section 796, the predecessor to the current partition cost statute, "counsel fees may be allowed ... for services rendered for the common benefit even in contested partition suits." ( Capuccio v. Caire (1932) 215 Cal. 518 , 528-529, 11 P.2d 1097 ( Capuccio ).) In Capuccio , a defendant argued "that the services performed by plaintiff's counsel in connection with the many controverted issues presented by the partition litigation" were not " 'for the common benefit.' " ( Id. at p. 528, 11 P.2d 1097 .) The Supreme Cour | 2 | 4 |
Capuccio v. Cairegreen2 sentences2017Our Supreme Court has spoken on this issue directly, holding that under former section 796, the predecessor to the current partition cost statute, "counsel fees may be allowed ... for services rendered for the common benefit even in contested partition suits." ( Capuccio v. Caire (1932) 215 Cal. 518 , 528-529, 11 P.2d 1097 ( Capuccio ).) In Capuccio , a defendant argued "that the services performed by plaintiff's counsel in connection with the many controverted issues presented by the partition litigation" were not " 'for the common benefit.' " ( Id. at p. 528, 11 P.2d 1097 .) The Supreme Cour 2017Our Supreme Court has spoken on this issue directly, holding that under former section 796, the predecessor to the current partition cost statute, "counsel fees may be allowed ... for services rendered for the common benefit even in contested partition suits." ( Capuccio v. Caire (1932) 215 Cal. 518 , 528-529, 11 P.2d 1097 ( Capuccio ).) In Capuccio , a defendant argued "that the services performed by plaintiff's counsel in connection with the many controverted issues presented by the partition litigation" were not " 'for the common benefit.' " ( Id. at p. 528, 11 P.2d 1097 .) The Supreme Cour | 2 | 3 |
Riley v. Turpingreen2 sentences2017Our Supreme Court has spoken on this issue directly, holding that under former section 796, the predecessor to the current partition cost statute, "counsel fees may be allowed ... for services rendered for the common benefit even in contested partition suits." ( Capuccio v. Caire (1932) 215 Cal. 518 , 528-529, 11 P.2d 1097 ( Capuccio ).) In Capuccio , a defendant argued "that the services performed by plaintiff's counsel in connection with the many controverted issues presented by the partition litigation" were not " 'for the common benefit.' " ( Id. at p. 528, 11 P.2d 1097 .) The Supreme Cour 2017Our Supreme Court has spoken on this issue directly, holding that under former section 796, the predecessor to the current partition cost statute, "counsel fees may be allowed ... for services rendered for the common benefit even in contested partition suits." ( Capuccio v. Caire (1932) 215 Cal. 518 , 528-529, 11 P.2d 1097 ( Capuccio ).) In Capuccio , a defendant argued "that the services performed by plaintiff's counsel in connection with the many controverted issues presented by the partition litigation" were not " 'for the common benefit.' " ( Id. at p. 528, 11 P.2d 1097 .) The Supreme Cour | 1 | 2 |
Randell v. Randellgreen2 sentences1960(See also Rrandell v. Randell (1935), 4 Cal.2d 575, 582 [5] [ 50 P.2d 806 ].) Plaintiff and defendant were the only parties to the present partition litigation, all controversies were between themselves alone, the court allowed counsel fees in the same amount to each party, and it appears that the allowance of such fees to defendant was authorized equally with the allowance of counsel fees to plaintiff. 1960(See also Rrandell v. Randell (1935), 4 Cal.2d 575, 582 [5] [ 50 P.2d 806 ].) Plaintiff and defendant were the only parties to the present partition litigation, all controversies were between themselves alone, the court allowed counsel fees in the same amount to each party, and it appears that the allowance of such fees to defendant was authorized equally with the allowance of counsel fees to plaintiff. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Farnum v. Phoenix Insurance
green
1 sentence1910Co., 83 Cal. 246 , [ 17 Am. | 1 | 1910–1910 |
Bissit v. Kentucky River Navigation Co.
neutral
1 sentence1907The just and equitable rule appears to us to be that declared in Bissit v. Kentucky River Navigation Co., 15 Fed. 353 , and Wilson v. Kiesel, 9 Utah, 397 , [ 35 P. 488 ], — i.e. that in such case the plaintiff stockholder must contribute ratably with the defendant stockholders toward the liquidation of his demand against the corporation. | 1 | 1907–1907 |
Wilson v. Kiesel
neutral
1 sentence1907The just and equitable rule appears to us to be that declared in Bissit v. Kentucky River Navigation Co., 15 Fed. 353 , and Wilson v. Kiesel, 9 Utah, 397 , [ 35 P. 488 ], — i.e. that in such case the plaintiff stockholder must contribute ratably with the defendant stockholders toward the liquidation of his demand against the corporation. | 1 | 1907–1907 |
Town of Guilford v. . the Supervisors of Chenango County
green
1 sentence1877(See Cooley on Constitutional Limitations, 232, 233, and 361, and authorities cited in note 1; Cooley on Taxation, 91, 104, 105, 110, 111, and 479; Sharpless v. Mayor &c. of Philadelphia, 21 Pa. St. 147; Town of Guilford v. Sups, of Chenango County, 13 N. Y. 143 ; Creighton v. San Francisco, 42 Cal. 450 ; Sinton v. Ashbury, 41 Cal. 525 ; Beals v. Amadore, 35 Cal. 625 ; Blanding v. Burr, 13 Cal. 343 .) The enabling act, in all its provisions, is supported by reason and justice, by the letter and spirit of the State Constitution, and by the text-books and adjudged cases of the whole country. | 1 | 1877–1877 |
People ex rel. Blanding v. Burr
green
1 sentence1877(See Cooley on Constitutional Limitations, 232, 233, and 361, and authorities cited in note 1; Cooley on Taxation, 91, 104, 105, 110, 111, and 479; Sharpless v. Mayor &c. of Philadelphia, 21 Pa. St. 147; Town of Guilford v. Sups, of Chenango County, 13 N. Y. 143 ; Creighton v. San Francisco, 42 Cal. 450 ; Sinton v. Ashbury, 41 Cal. 525 ; Beals v. Amadore, 35 Cal. 625 ; Blanding v. Burr, 13 Cal. 343 .) The enabling act, in all its provisions, is supported by reason and justice, by the letter and spirit of the State Constitution, and by the text-books and adjudged cases of the whole country. | 1 | 1877–1877 |
Sinton v. Ashbury
green
1 sentence1877(See Cooley on Constitutional Limitations, 232, 233, and 361, and authorities cited in note 1; Cooley on Taxation, 91, 104, 105, 110, 111, and 479; Sharpless v. Mayor &c. of Philadelphia, 21 Pa. St. 147; Town of Guilford v. Sups, of Chenango County, 13 N. Y. 143 ; Creighton v. San Francisco, 42 Cal. 450 ; Sinton v. Ashbury, 41 Cal. 525 ; Beals v. Amadore, 35 Cal. 625 ; Blanding v. Burr, 13 Cal. 343 .) The enabling act, in all its provisions, is supported by reason and justice, by the letter and spirit of the State Constitution, and by the text-books and adjudged cases of the whole country. | 1 | 1877–1877 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.