Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 California opinions name it 2 courts 1966–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
County of Kern v. Sparksgreen1 sentence2024Code, § 12650, subd. (b)(1) [defining “[c]laim” under the False Claims Act as a “request or demand for money . . . made to any employee, officer, or agent of the state or of any 4 political subdivision”]; accord, County of Kern v. Sparks (2007) 149 Cal.App.4th 11, 17 .) Because Vanessa’s request for renewal of the DVRO is not a monetary claim, the False Claims Act (despite its name) does not provide Eric with a basis for challenging the order on appeal. | 1 | 1 |
Phillips v. Desert Hospital Districtgreen1 sentence2016(Phillips, supra, 49 Cal.3d at p. 708, fn. 7 ; Del Real v. City of Riverside, supra, 95 Cal.App.4th at p. 769 ; Wood v. Riverside General Hospital (1994) 25 Cal.App.4th 1113, 1118 ; Loehr, supra, 147 Cal.App.3d at p. 1083 ; Tyus v. City of Los Angeles (1977) 74 Cal.App.3d 667 , 671- 672 (Tyus).) 12 If a “claim as presented” does not substantially comply with the requirements of Government Code section 910, the public entity must advise the claimant of the deficiencies or lose the right to assert a defense as to the sufficiency of the claim. | 1 | 1 |
Cynthia D. v. Superior Courtgreen2 sentences1994Under the circumstances of this particular case, appointed counsel is necessary to assure a “level playing field.” (See Cynthia D. v. Superior Court (1993) 5 Cal.4th 242, 255 [ 19 Cal.Rptr.2d 698 , 851 P.2d 1307 ].) This is particularly so in the unique situation where the state has elected to represent one private citizen against another. 1994Under the circumstances of this particular case, appointed counsel is necessary to assure a “level playing field.” (See Cynthia D. v. Superior Court (1993) 5 Cal.4th 242, 255 [ 19 Cal.Rptr.2d 698 , 851 P.2d 1307 ].) This is particularly so in the unique situation where the state has elected to represent one private citizen against another. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Wood v. Riverside General Hospital
green
2 sentences2006(Id. at p. 1084.) Similarly, in Wood v. Riverside General Hospital (1994) 25 Cal.App.4th 1113 [ 31 Cal.Rptr.2d 8 ], the court found documents in which the plaintiff’s mother complained about the plaintiff’s care while hospitalized did not substantially comply with the Tort Claims Act because they were not transmitted to the statutorily designated agent and did not indicate that a monetary claim was being asserted. 2006(Id. at p. 1084.) Similarly, in Wood v. Riverside General Hospital (1994) 25 Cal.App.4th 1113 [ 31 Cal.Rptr.2d 8 ], the court found documents in which the plaintiff’s mother complained about the plaintiff’s care while hospitalized did not substantially comply with the Tort Claims Act because they were not transmitted to the statutorily designated agent and did not indicate that a monetary claim was being asserted. | 2 | 2006–2016 |
Loehr v. Ventura County Community College District
green
2 sentences2016(Phillips, supra, 49 Cal.3d at p. 708, fn. 7 ; Del Real v. City of Riverside, supra, 95 Cal.App.4th at p. 769 ; Wood v. Riverside General Hospital (1994) 25 Cal.App.4th 1113, 1118 ; Loehr, supra, 147 Cal.App.3d at p. 1083 ; Tyus v. City of Los Angeles (1977) 74 Cal.App.3d 667 , 671- 672 (Tyus).) 12 If a “claim as presented” does not substantially comply with the requirements of Government Code section 910, the public entity must advise the claimant of the deficiencies or lose the right to assert a defense as to the sufficiency of the claim. 2016(Phillips, supra, 49 Cal.3d at p. 708, fn. 7 ; Del Real v. City of Riverside, supra, 95 Cal.App.4th at p. 769 ; Wood v. Riverside General Hospital (1994) 25 Cal.App.4th 1113, 1118 ; Loehr, supra, 147 Cal.App.3d at p. 1083 ; Tyus v. City of Los Angeles (1977) 74 Cal.App.3d 667 , 671- 672 (Tyus).) 12 If a “claim as presented” does not substantially comply with the requirements of Government Code section 910, the public entity must advise the claimant of the deficiencies or lose the right to assert a defense as to the sufficiency of the claim. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Tyus v. City of Los Angeles
green
1 sentence2016(Phillips, supra, 49 Cal.3d at p. 708, fn. 7 ; Del Real v. City of Riverside, supra, 95 Cal.App.4th at p. 769 ; Wood v. Riverside General Hospital (1994) 25 Cal.App.4th 1113, 1118 ; Loehr, supra, 147 Cal.App.3d at p. 1083 ; Tyus v. City of Los Angeles (1977) 74 Cal.App.3d 667 , 671- 672 (Tyus).) 12 If a “claim as presented” does not substantially comply with the requirements of Government Code section 910, the public entity must advise the claimant of the deficiencies or lose the right to assert a defense as to the sufficiency of the claim. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Del Real v. City of Riverside
green
2 sentences2016(Del Real v. City of Riverside (2002) 95 Cal.App.4th 761, 769 .) A writing which does not indicate the plaintiff is asserting a monetary claim does not substantially comply with the Government Claims Act. 2016(Phillips, supra, 49 Cal.3d at p. 708, fn. 7 ; Del Real v. City of Riverside, supra, 95 Cal.App.4th at p. 769 ; Wood v. Riverside General Hospital (1994) 25 Cal.App.4th 1113, 1118 ; Loehr, supra, 147 Cal.App.3d at p. 1083 ; Tyus v. City of Los Angeles (1977) 74 Cal.App.3d 667 , 671- 672 (Tyus).) 12 If a “claim as presented” does not substantially comply with the requirements of Government Code section 910, the public entity must advise the claimant of the deficiencies or lose the right to assert a defense as to the sufficiency of the claim. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Robert Dean Mattis, M.D. v. Patrolman Richard R. Schnarr
green
1 sentence1977Appellant cites Mattis v. Schnarr (8th Cir. 1974) 502 F.2d 588 , for the proposition that our wrongful death statute can be construed to authorize equitable relief in addition to a monetary claim for damages. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Guss v. Utah Labor Relations Board
green
2 sentences1966This case requires us to construe section 14(e) of the Act, 1 added by Congress in 1959 to resolve questions arising from the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Guss v. Utah Labor Relations Board (1957) 353 U.S. 1 [ 77 S.Ct. 598 , *24 609, 1 L.Ed.2d 601 ], In Guss and its companion cases, 2 the court held that the Act vests the board with exclusive authority to grant injunctive relief in. labor disputes affecting interstate commerce. 1966This case requires us to construe section 14(e) of the Act, 1 added by Congress in 1959 to resolve questions arising from the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Guss v. Utah Labor Relations Board (1957) 353 U.S. 1 [ 77 S.Ct. 598 , *24 609, 1 L.Ed.2d 601 ], In Guss and its companion cases, 2 the court held that the Act vests the board with exclusive authority to grant injunctive relief in. labor disputes affecting interstate commerce. | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.