Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1992–2004 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. De Wolfgreen2 sentences1995To satisfy such inquiry, it is reasonable that she should be heard in her declarations, that she did so communicate it, and that testimony should be received to confirm her story.” State v. De Wolf, 8 Conn. 93, 100 (1830). 1994The genesis of the rule in Connecticut is found in State v. De Wolf, 8 Conn. 93, 100 (1830): “If a female testifies, that such an outrage has been committed on her person, an enquiry is, at once, suggested, why it was not communicated to her female friends. | 2 | 2 |
Byers v. Burlesongreen1 sentence1992See Byers v. Burleson, supra, 440 ; Waste Management, Inc. v. International Surplus Lines, 144 Ill.2d 178 , 161 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Volpe
green
2 sentences2004The genesis of this rule is the common-law principle that “one State or sovereignty cannot enforce the penal laws of another, nor punish offenses committed in and against another State or sovereignty.” State v. Volpe, 113 Conn. 288, 294 , 155 A. 223 (1931). 2004The genesis of this rule is the common-law principle that “one State or sovereignty cannot enforce the penal laws of another, nor punish offenses committed in and against another State or sovereignty.” State v. Volpe, 113 Conn. 288, 294 , 155 A. 223 (1931). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Textron, Inc. v. Wood
green
1 sentence1996An enlightening discussion of the genesis of the doctrine of "sovereign immunity" is made by Justice Cotter in Textron, Inc. v. Wood, 167 Conn. 334 , 340 (1974), in which he states: Rooted in the ancient common law, the doctrine of sovereign immunity from suit was originally premised on the monarchical, semi-religious tenet that "the King can do no wrong." Borchard, "Government Liability in Tort," 34 Yale L.J. 1 , 2. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
United States v. Wade
green
2 sentences1995The genesis of the rule requiring that the identification of persons accused of crime be free of the taint of a suggestive procedure comes from an acknowledgment that identification by an eyewitness of a person as the one who perpetrated the crime “is peculiarly riddled with innumerable dangers and variable factors which might seriously, even crucially, derogate from a fair trial.” United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218, 228 , 87 S. Ct. 1926 , 18 L. 1995The genesis of the rule requiring that the identification of persons accused of crime be free of the taint of a suggestive procedure comes from an acknowledgment that identification by an eyewitness of a person as the one who perpetrated the crime “is peculiarly riddled with innumerable dangers and variable factors which might seriously, even crucially, derogate from a fair trial.” United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218, 228 , 87 S. Ct. 1926 , 18 L. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Waste Management, Inc. v. International Surplus Lines Insurance
green
1 sentence1992See Byers v. Burleson, supra, 440 ; Waste Management, Inc. v. International Surplus Lines, 144 Ill.2d 178 , 161 Ill. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.