Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1981–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
East Line & Red River Railroad v. Scottgreen2 sentences2005Wood, Theatise on the Law of MasteR & Servant § 272 (1877). *585 The genesis of the doctrine in Texas can be traced to the Texas Supreme Court ruling in East Line and Red River Railroad Company v. Scott, wherein the court, relying on various authorities including Wood’s Rule, stated that “[i]t is very generally, if not uniformly held, when the term of service is left to the discretion of either party, or the term left indefinite, or determinable by either party, that either may put an end to it at will, and so without cause.” 72 Tex. 70 , 10 S.W. 99, 102 (Tex.1888). 2005Wood, Theatise on the Law of MasteR & Servant § 272 (1877). *585 The genesis of the doctrine in Texas can be traced to the Texas Supreme Court ruling in East Line and Red River Railroad Company v. Scott, wherein the court, relying on various authorities including Wood’s Rule, stated that “[i]t is very generally, if not uniformly held, when the term of service is left to the discretion of either party, or the term left indefinite, or determinable by either party, that either may put an end to it at will, and so without cause.” 72 Tex. 70 , 10 S.W. 99, 102 (Tex.1888). | 3 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Texas Department of Public Safety v. Cox Texas Newspapers, L.P.
green
2 sentences2015Rep. 2267 , 54 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1428 (Cite as: 343 S.W.3d 112 ) which the Court relies in withholding the information. facts (discussed in Industrial Foundation and ana- lyzed under the employment file exception, prede- The genesis of the test is a one-page letter ruling cessor to section 552.102) as another “judicial deci- from 1974, that was later expanded in 1977. 2015Rep. 2267 , 54 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1428 (Cite as: 343 S.W.3d 112 ) which the Court relies in withholding the information. facts (discussed in Industrial Foundation and ana- lyzed under the employment file exception, prede- The genesis of the test is a one-page letter ruling cessor to section 552.102) as another “judicial deci- from 1974, that was later expanded in 1977. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Charles H. Keating, Jr. v. Office of Thrift Supervision
green
1 sentence2015All Keating, 45 F.3d at 324-25 ). the cases cited here either cite Plumbers and Pipejillers directly, or cite a case that cites Plumbers and Pipejillers. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Davis v. State
green
2 sentences1998Davis, 545 S.W.2d at 150 . 1998Davis, 545 S.W.2d at 150 . *764 There are four reasons why the principle, stated in Davis, McClendon, Livingston, and Blessett , that misdemeanors not involving moral turpitude cannot be considered evidence of lack of reformation, may not be controlling: (1) the unfirm foundation of the principle; (2) the distinctions between those cases and this one in terms of the number of misdemeanor convictions and the evenly spaced commissions over such a long period of time; (3) it appears to be contrary to language of Theus that speaks merely of "running afoul of the law"; and (4) it simply does not ma | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Cameron v. Terrell & Garrett, Inc.
green
1 sentence1993The genesis of this rule was the Texas Supreme Court’s holding in Cameron v. Terrell & Garrett, Inc., 618 S.W.2d 535 (Tex.1981). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Ex Parte Gallegos
green
1 sentence1981The genesis of this standard is traced to MacKenna v. Ellis, 280 F.2d 592 (5th Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 877 , 82 S.Ct. 121 , 7 L.Ed.2d 78 (1961), [cited with approval in Caraway v. State, 417 S.W.2d 159 (Tex.Cr.App.1967) and Ex parte Gallegos, 511 S.W.2d 510 (Tex.Cr.App.1974)] where the court said: “We interpret the right to counsel as the right to effective counsel. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Caraway v. State
green
1 sentence1981The genesis of this standard is traced to MacKenna v. Ellis, 280 F.2d 592 (5th Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 877 , 82 S.Ct. 121 , 7 L.Ed.2d 78 (1961), [cited with approval in Caraway v. State, 417 S.W.2d 159 (Tex.Cr.App.1967) and Ex parte Gallegos, 511 S.W.2d 510 (Tex.Cr.App.1974)] where the court said: “We interpret the right to counsel as the right to effective counsel. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Edward Morgan MacKenna v. O. B. Ellis, Director, Texas Department of Corrections
green
1 sentence1981The genesis of this standard is traced to MacKenna v. Ellis, 280 F.2d 592 (5th Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 877 , 82 S.Ct. 121 , 7 L.Ed.2d 78 (1961), [cited with approval in Caraway v. State, 417 S.W.2d 159 (Tex.Cr.App.1967) and Ex parte Gallegos, 511 S.W.2d 510 (Tex.Cr.App.1974)] where the court said: “We interpret the right to counsel as the right to effective counsel. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Ellis v. MacKenna
green
1 sentence1981The genesis of this standard is traced to MacKenna v. Ellis, 280 F.2d 592 (5th Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 877 , 82 S.Ct. 121 , 7 L.Ed.2d 78 (1961), [cited with approval in Caraway v. State, 417 S.W.2d 159 (Tex.Cr.App.1967) and Ex parte Gallegos, 511 S.W.2d 510 (Tex.Cr.App.1974)] where the court said: “We interpret the right to counsel as the right to effective counsel. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.