jury charge assigned error (Connecticut) · Go Syfert
← Connecticut issues

jury charge assigned error in Connecticut

6 Connecticut opinions name it 1 courts 1988–1994 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Pietrorazio v. Santopietrogreen
conn · 1981 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1988–1988
2 sentences

1988Voight v. Selman, 14 Conn. App. 198, 200 , 540 A.2d 104 (1988); see also Pietrorazio v. Santopietro, 185 Conn. 510, 514-15 , 441 A.2d 163 (1981); Mozzer v. Bush, 11 Conn. App. 434, 437 , 527 A.2d 727 (1987); Shenefield v. Greenwich Hospital Assn., 10 Conn. App. 239 , 243 n.3, 522 A.2d 829 (1987).

1988Voight v. Selman, 14 Conn. App. 198, 200 , 540 A.2d 104 (1988); see also Pietrorazio v. Santopietro, 185 Conn. 510, 514-15 , 441 A.2d 163 (1981); Mozzer v. Bush, 11 Conn. App. 434, 437 , 527 A.2d 727 (1987); Shenefield v. Greenwich Hospital Assn., 10 Conn. App. 239 , 243 n.3, 522 A.2d 829 (1987).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (10)

CaseCitedYears
Small v. South Norwalk Savings Bank green
conn · 1988
2 sentences

1993The defendant made no written request to charge, and took only a general exception to the jury instructions.* I*** 5 “In order to preserve full appellate review of a jury charge assigned as error, an appellant must not only move to set aside the verdict; Small v. South Norwalk Savings Bank, 205 Conn. 751, 758 , 535 A.2d 1292 (1988); but must also set forth, either in the motion itself, in supporting briefs, or in oral argument at a hearing held on the motion, each claim of error with sufficient specificity to enable the trial court to consider the claimed errors.” Cuartas v. Greenwich, 14 Conn

1993The defendant made no written request to charge, and took only a general exception to the jury instructions.* I*** 5 “In order to preserve full appellate review of a jury charge assigned as error, an appellant must not only move to set aside the verdict; Small v. South Norwalk Savings Bank, 205 Conn. 751, 758 , 535 A.2d 1292 (1988); but must also set forth, either in the motion itself, in supporting briefs, or in oral argument at a hearing held on the motion, each claim of error with sufficient specificity to enable the trial court to consider the claimed errors.” Cuartas v. Greenwich, 14 Conn

41988–1993
Cuartas v. Town of Greenwich green
connappct · 1988
2 sentences

1993The defendant made no written request to charge, and took only a general exception to the jury instructions.* I*** 5 “In order to preserve full appellate review of a jury charge assigned as error, an appellant must not only move to set aside the verdict; Small v. South Norwalk Savings Bank, 205 Conn. 751, 758 , 535 A.2d 1292 (1988); but must also set forth, either in the motion itself, in supporting briefs, or in oral argument at a hearing held on the motion, each claim of error with sufficient specificity to enable the trial court to consider the claimed errors.” Cuartas v. Greenwich, 14 Conn

1993The defendant made no written request to charge, and took only a general exception to the jury instructions.* I*** 5 “In order to preserve full appellate review of a jury charge assigned as error, an appellant must not only move to set aside the verdict; Small v. South Norwalk Savings Bank, 205 Conn. 751, 758 , 535 A.2d 1292 (1988); but must also set forth, either in the motion itself, in supporting briefs, or in oral argument at a hearing held on the motion, each claim of error with sufficient specificity to enable the trial court to consider the claimed errors.” Cuartas v. Greenwich, 14 Conn

41989–1993
Budlong v. Nadeau green
conn · 1993
2 sentences

1993We disagree. “ ‘[T]o preserve full appellate review of a jury charge assigned as error, an appellant must not only move to set aside the verdict . . . but must also set forth, either in the motion itself, in supporting briefs, or in oral argument at a hearing held on the motion, each claim of error with sufficient specificity to enable the trial court to consider the claimed errors.’ ” (Citations omitted.) Budlong v. Nadeau, 30 Conn. App. 61, 65 , 619 A.2d 4 , cert. denied, 225 Conn. 909 , 621 A.2d 290 (1993), quoting Cuartas v. Greenwich, 14 Conn. App. 370, 374 , 540 A.2d 1071 , cert. denied,

1993We disagree. “ ‘[T]o preserve full appellate review of a jury charge assigned as error, an appellant must not only move to set aside the verdict . . . but must also set forth, either in the motion itself, in supporting briefs, or in oral argument at a hearing held on the motion, each claim of error with sufficient specificity to enable the trial court to consider the claimed errors.’ ” (Citations omitted.) Budlong v. Nadeau, 30 Conn. App. 61, 65 , 619 A.2d 4 , cert. denied, 225 Conn. 909 , 621 A.2d 290 (1993), quoting Cuartas v. Greenwich, 14 Conn. App. 370, 374 , 540 A.2d 1071 , cert. denied,

21993–1994
Budlong v. Nadeau green
connappct · 1993
2 sentences

1993We disagree. “ ‘[T]o preserve full appellate review of a jury charge assigned as error, an appellant must not only move to set aside the verdict . . . but must also set forth, either in the motion itself, in supporting briefs, or in oral argument at a hearing held on the motion, each claim of error with sufficient specificity to enable the trial court to consider the claimed errors.’ ” (Citations omitted.) Budlong v. Nadeau, 30 Conn. App. 61, 65 , 619 A.2d 4 , cert. denied, 225 Conn. 909 , 621 A.2d 290 (1993), quoting Cuartas v. Greenwich, 14 Conn. App. 370, 374 , 540 A.2d 1071 , cert. denied,

1993We disagree. “ ‘[T]o preserve full appellate review of a jury charge assigned as error, an appellant must not only move to set aside the verdict . . . but must also set forth, either in the motion itself, in supporting briefs, or in oral argument at a hearing held on the motion, each claim of error with sufficient specificity to enable the trial court to consider the claimed errors.’ ” (Citations omitted.) Budlong v. Nadeau, 30 Conn. App. 61, 65 , 619 A.2d 4 , cert. denied, 225 Conn. 909 , 621 A.2d 290 (1993), quoting Cuartas v. Greenwich, 14 Conn. App. 370, 374 , 540 A.2d 1071 , cert. denied,

21993–1994
Cuartas v. Town of Greenwich green
conn · 1988
2 sentences

1993The defendant made no written request to charge, and took only a general exception to the jury instructions.* I*** 5 “In order to preserve full appellate review of a jury charge assigned as error, an appellant must not only move to set aside the verdict; Small v. South Norwalk Savings Bank, 205 Conn. 751, 758 , 535 A.2d 1292 (1988); but must also set forth, either in the motion itself, in supporting briefs, or in oral argument at a hearing held on the motion, each claim of error with sufficient specificity to enable the trial court to consider the claimed errors.” Cuartas v. Greenwich, 14 Conn

1993The defendant made no written request to charge, and took only a general exception to the jury instructions.* I*** 5 “In order to preserve full appellate review of a jury charge assigned as error, an appellant must not only move to set aside the verdict; Small v. South Norwalk Savings Bank, 205 Conn. 751, 758 , 535 A.2d 1292 (1988); but must also set forth, either in the motion itself, in supporting briefs, or in oral argument at a hearing held on the motion, each claim of error with sufficient specificity to enable the trial court to consider the claimed errors.” Cuartas v. Greenwich, 14 Conn

21993–1993
Voight v. Selman neutral
connappct · 1988
2 sentences

1992Voight v. Sel-man, 14 Conn. App. 198, 200 , 540 A.2d 104 (1988); see also Pietrorazio v. Santopietro, [supra,] 514-15 ; Moz-zer v. Bush, 11 Conn. App. 434, 437 , 527 A.2d 727 (1987); Shenefield v. Greenwich Hospital Assn., 10 Conn. App. 239 , 243 n.3, 522 A.2d 829 (1987).” Cuartas v. Greenwich, 14 Conn. App. 370, 374-75 , 540 A.2d 1071 (1988).

1992Voight v. Sel-man, 14 Conn. App. 198, 200 , 540 A.2d 104 (1988); see also Pietrorazio v. Santopietro, [supra,] 514-15 ; Moz-zer v. Bush, 11 Conn. App. 434, 437 , 527 A.2d 727 (1987); Shenefield v. Greenwich Hospital Assn., 10 Conn. App. 239 , 243 n.3, 522 A.2d 829 (1987).” Cuartas v. Greenwich, 14 Conn. App. 370, 374-75 , 540 A.2d 1071 (1988).

21988–1992
Shenefield v. Greenwich Hospital Ass'n green
connappct · 1987
2 sentences

1992Voight v. Sel-man, 14 Conn. App. 198, 200 , 540 A.2d 104 (1988); see also Pietrorazio v. Santopietro, [supra,] 514-15 ; Moz-zer v. Bush, 11 Conn. App. 434, 437 , 527 A.2d 727 (1987); Shenefield v. Greenwich Hospital Assn., 10 Conn. App. 239 , 243 n.3, 522 A.2d 829 (1987).” Cuartas v. Greenwich, 14 Conn. App. 370, 374-75 , 540 A.2d 1071 (1988).

1992Voight v. Sel-man, 14 Conn. App. 198, 200 , 540 A.2d 104 (1988); see also Pietrorazio v. Santopietro, [supra,] 514-15 ; Moz-zer v. Bush, 11 Conn. App. 434, 437 , 527 A.2d 727 (1987); Shenefield v. Greenwich Hospital Assn., 10 Conn. App. 239 , 243 n.3, 522 A.2d 829 (1987).” Cuartas v. Greenwich, 14 Conn. App. 370, 374-75 , 540 A.2d 1071 (1988).

21988–1992
Mozzer v. Bush green
connappct · 1987
2 sentences

1992Voight v. Sel-man, 14 Conn. App. 198, 200 , 540 A.2d 104 (1988); see also Pietrorazio v. Santopietro, [supra,] 514-15 ; Moz-zer v. Bush, 11 Conn. App. 434, 437 , 527 A.2d 727 (1987); Shenefield v. Greenwich Hospital Assn., 10 Conn. App. 239 , 243 n.3, 522 A.2d 829 (1987).” Cuartas v. Greenwich, 14 Conn. App. 370, 374-75 , 540 A.2d 1071 (1988).

1992Voight v. Sel-man, 14 Conn. App. 198, 200 , 540 A.2d 104 (1988); see also Pietrorazio v. Santopietro, [supra,] 514-15 ; Moz-zer v. Bush, 11 Conn. App. 434, 437 , 527 A.2d 727 (1987); Shenefield v. Greenwich Hospital Assn., 10 Conn. App. 239 , 243 n.3, 522 A.2d 829 (1987).” Cuartas v. Greenwich, 14 Conn. App. 370, 374-75 , 540 A.2d 1071 (1988).

21988–1992
State v. Kwaak green
conn · 1990
2 sentences

1994In order to preserve full appellate review of a jury charge assigned as error, the plaintiffs must (1) have either (a) requested the court to charge on the topic or (b) objected to the charge as given; Practice Book § 315; State v. Kwaak, 21 Conn. App. 138 , 160 n.9, 572 A.2d 1015 , cert. denied, 215 Conn. 811 , 576 A.2d 540 (1990); and (2) moved to set aside the verdict.

1994In order to preserve full appellate review of a jury charge assigned as error, the plaintiffs must (1) have either (a) requested the court to charge on the topic or (b) objected to the charge as given; Practice Book § 315; State v. Kwaak, 21 Conn. App. 138 , 160 n.9, 572 A.2d 1015 , cert. denied, 215 Conn. 811 , 576 A.2d 540 (1990); and (2) moved to set aside the verdict.

11994–1994
State v. Kwaak green
connappct · 1990
2 sentences

1994In order to preserve full appellate review of a jury charge assigned as error, the plaintiffs must (1) have either (a) requested the court to charge on the topic or (b) objected to the charge as given; Practice Book § 315; State v. Kwaak, 21 Conn. App. 138 , 160 n.9, 572 A.2d 1015 , cert. denied, 215 Conn. 811 , 576 A.2d 540 (1990); and (2) moved to set aside the verdict.

1994In order to preserve full appellate review of a jury charge assigned as error, the plaintiffs must (1) have either (a) requested the court to charge on the topic or (b) objected to the charge as given; Practice Book § 315; State v. Kwaak, 21 Conn. App. 138 , 160 n.9, 572 A.2d 1015 , cert. denied, 215 Conn. 811 , 576 A.2d 540 (1990); and (2) moved to set aside the verdict.

11994–1994

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check