6 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1917–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Harper v. Gallowaygreen1 sentence1917See Harper v. Galloway, 58 Fla. 255 , 51 South. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Connally v. General Construction Co.
green
2 sentences2013Id. at 393 , 46 S.Ct. 126 (citation omitted). 2013Id. at 393 , 46 S.Ct. 126 (citation omitted). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
John Gund Brewing Co. v. United States
neutral
1 sentence1961See Hamilton v. State, supra; John Gund Brewing Co. v. United States, 8 Cir., 1913, 206 F. 386 ; People v. Welch, 1928, 89 Cal. App. 18 , 264 P. 324 ; 15 C.J.S. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
People v. Welch
green
2 sentences1961See Hamilton v. State, supra; John Gund Brewing Co. v. United States, 8 Cir., 1913, 206 F. 386 ; People v. Welch, 1928, 89 Cal. App. 18 , 264 P. 324 ; 15 C.J.S. 1961See Hamilton v. State, supra; John Gund Brewing Co. v. United States, 8 Cir., 1913, 206 F. 386 ; People v. Welch, 1928, 89 Cal. App. 18 , 264 P. 324 ; 15 C.J.S. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Copeland v. State
green
1 sentence1959In his petition for writ of habeas corpus the appellant contended that the sentence imposed in the judgment of the Circuit Court for Marion County was invalid under the decision of the Florida Supreme Court in Copeland v. State, Fla., 76 So.2d 137 ; that Sections 801.02 and 801.03, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., under which the sentence was imposed, was unconstitutional; that the act charged in the third count was a mere continuation of the act charged in the first count, of which the appellant was acquitted; that both Counts 2 and 3 failed to charge a definite and specific felony; that the languag | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Bailey v. Poitier
neutral
1 sentence1942This provision of the general power conferred upon all municipalities was considered by this Court in the ease of Bailey v. Poitier, 86 Fla. 160 , 97 So. 311 . | 1 | 1942–1942 |
Weathers v. Tyler
neutral
1 sentence1942This provision of the general power conferred upon all municipalities was considered by this Court in the ease of Bailey v. Poitier, 86 Fla. 160 , 97 So. 311 . | 1 | 1942–1942 |
Hurvich v. State
green
2 sentences1938The officers of the law may not be enjoined by a district court from enforcing the applicable statutes of Oklahoma providing a punishment for violation of the statutes of Oklahoma.” In the case of Hurvich v. State, 230 Ala. 578 , 162 Sou. 362 , in which the Supreme Court of Alabama had under consideration suit in equity to' declare a slot machine contraband and to be destroyed pursuant to the power contained in the legislative Act approved July 25, 1931, the Court said: “Appellant contends that it is not subject to condemnation and destruction because it is not shown ever to have been used for 1938The officers of the law may not be enjoined by a district court from enforcing the applicable statutes of Oklahoma providing a punishment for violation of the statutes of Oklahoma.” In the case of Hurvich v. State, 230 Ala. 578 , 162 Sou. 362 , in which the Supreme Court of Alabama had under consideration suit in equity to' declare a slot machine contraband and to be destroyed pursuant to the power contained in the legislative Act approved July 25, 1931, the Court said: “Appellant contends that it is not subject to condemnation and destruction because it is not shown ever to have been used for | 1 | 1938–1938 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.