third point error (Hawaii) · Go Syfert
← Hawaii issues

third point error in Hawaii

6 Hawaii opinions name it 2 courts 1995–2025 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Hawaii courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (6)

CaseFollowedCited
Association of Apartment Owners of Wailea Elua v. Wailea Resort Co.green
haw · 2002 · cited in 1 Hawaii opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
1 sentence

2025Our review of the record indicates that neither error was preserved, and these contentions are waived. 7 Ass'n of Apartment Owners of Wailea Elua v. Wailea Resort Co., 100 Hawai‘i 6 In his argument, Bronfman provides no record citation for this statement. 7 With respect to the third point of error challenging the lack of findings and conclusions, it appears Bronfman took a contrary position below, filing an objection to Sheehan's submission of proposed findings and conclusions because the circuit court 'did not articulate any' and '[n]either [the statute] or Court Rules require[d]" such. 13 NO

11
Marvin v. Pflueger.green
haw · 2012 · cited in 1 Hawaii opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023
1 sentence

2023See Marvin v. Pflueger, 127 Hawai‘i 490, 496, 280 P.3d 88, 94 (2012) (noting policy of addressing cases on the merits, where possible, despite noncompliance with appellate rule).

11
Queen Emma Foundation v. Tatibouetgreen
hawapp · 2010 · cited in 1 Hawaii opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
1 sentence

2020In Queen Emma Foundation v. Tatibouet, 123 Hawai#i 500, 510, 236 P.3d 1236, 1246 (App. 2010), we addressed the question of "whether a claim for attorneys' fees and costs keeps alive an otherwise moot controversy." There, the circuit court had awarded the plaintiff attorneys' fees and costs as the prevailing party under the subject lease in that case and HRS § 607-14.

11
Leslie v. Estate of Tavaresgreen
haw · 1999 · cited in 1 Hawaii opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
2 sentences

2014Leslie v. Estate of Tavares, 91 Hawai'i 394, 396 , 984 P.2d 1220, 1222 (1999).

2014Leslie v. Estate of Tavares, 91 Hawai'i 394, 396 , 984 P.2d 1220, 1222 (1999).

11
In the Interest of Doegreen
haw · 1994 · cited in 1 Hawaii opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009
1 sentence

2009See In re Doe, 77 Hawai`i 109, 115, 883 P.2d 30, 36 (1994) (stating that the family court "possesses wide discretion in making its decisions and those decisions will not be set aside unless there is a manifest abuse of discretion"). 4.

11
State v. Furutanigreen
haw · 1994 · cited in 1 Hawaii opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995
2 sentences

1995“An FOF is clearly erroneous when, despite evidence to support the finding, the appellate court is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” State v. Furutani, 76 Hawaii 172, 179 , 873 P.2d 51, 58 (1994).

1995“An FOF is clearly erroneous when, despite evidence to support the finding, the appellate court is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” State v. Furutani, 76 Hawaii 172, 179 , 873 P.2d 51, 58 (1994).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Hawaii. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Where else courts name it

TX 81 (1947–2025) HI 6 (1995–2025)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check