Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. District Court of Iowa, in & for Linn Countygreen1 sentence1980Under the second element the privilege is limited to “all knowledge and information gained by the physician in the observation and personal examination of the patient in the discharge of his duties.” State v. District Court, 218 N.W.2d 641, 643 (Iowa 1974). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Stecklein v. City of Cascade
green
1 sentence2023Stecklein, 693 N.W.2d at 340 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Bensley v. State
green
2 sentences2013We relied on the requirement of the second element of the clause that a claim be filed under any other law and concluded it “does not allow for an extension of the statute of limitations when the initial suit is filed under [the Act].” Id. 2013We relied on the requirement of the second element of the clause that a claim be filed under any other law and concluded it “does not allow for an extension of the statute of limitations when the initial suit is filed under [the Act].” Id. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Shaver v. Brock
neutral
1 sentence2004As the Texas Court of Appeals noted, "[W]e observe that both can1 and 'will' may be used to denote ability, and that in common usage, these words and their past tense forms, 'could' and 'would,' are sometimes used interchangeably.” Shaver v. Brock, 800 S.W.2d 657 , 659 n. 2 (Tex.Ct.App.1990) (citations omitted). 3 .For example, the second element of the instruction could state: At the time the defendant (describe act), the defendant expects to set in motion a force or chain of events which will cause or result in the death of (name of victim). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Boelman v. Manson State Bank
green
1 sentence2003Id. at 80-81 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
State v. Ray
green
1 sentence1995As to the second element of his claim, Spurgeon must prove *220 that his attorney’s “error worked to his actual and substantial disadvantage, creating a reasonable probability that but for the error the trial’s result would have been different.” Ray, 516 N.W.2d at 865 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.