6 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1970–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Theisgreen1 sentence2021See People v. Theis, 2011 IL App (2d) 091080, ¶ 38 (holding that failure to tender instruction results in forfeiture). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Beiermann v. Edwards
green
2 sentences2005Beiermann v. Edwards , 193 Ill. 2005Beiermann v. Edwards, 193 Ill. | 2 | 2005–2005 |
People v. Devin
green
2 sentences1984Defendant provides authority to support his argument, but People v. Devin (1982), 93 Ill.2d 326 , is not applicable to the facts in the case at bar. 1984Defendant provides authority to support his argument, but People v. Devin (1982), 93 Ill. 2d 326 , is not applicable to the facts in the case at bar. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
People v. Dalton
green
2 sentences1984The rule that the majority invokes is designed to protect against untrue confessions. ( People v. Dalton (1982), 91 Ill.2d 22, 29 .) The rule has been criticized, and it has been suggested that a cautionary jury instruction would *383 be preferable. (7 Wigmore, Evidence sec. 2070, at 510 (Chadbourn rev. ed. 1978).) To a great extent the protection of the rule is today afforded by the Miranda warnings. 1984(People v. Dalton (1982), 91 Ill. 2d 22, 29 .) The rule has been criticized, and it has been suggested that a cautionary jury instruction would be preferable. (7 Wigmore, Evidence sec. 2070, at 510 (Chadbourn rev. ed. 1978).) To a great extent the protection of the rule is today afforded by the Miranda warnings. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
The PEOPLE v. Lion
green
1 sentence1970People v. Herbert, 361 Ill 64, 71-72, 196 NE 821 (1935); People v. Lion, 10 Ill2d 208, 216, 139 NE2d 757 (1957). | 1 | 1970–1970 |
The People v. Herbert
green
1 sentence1970People v. Herbert, 361 Ill 64, 71-72, 196 NE 821 (1935); People v. Lion, 10 Ill2d 208, 216, 139 NE2d 757 (1957). | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.