Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Allengreen1 sentence2013See 161 Wn.App. at 735 ; 294 P. d at 682 87. 3 - 23 No. 41902 5 II - - would cross -examination, expert evidence, or arguments to the jury," Allen, 294 P. d at 685, the 3 Allen court left 'the determination on whether to give a cautionary jury instruction to the trial court's discretion. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Harris
green
2 sentences2013State v. Harris, 102 Wn.2d 148, 155 , 685 P. 2d 584 ( 1984) overruled on other grounds by State v. Brown, 111 Wn.2d 124 , 761 P. 2d 3 Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S. Ct. 2052 , 80 L. 2013State v. Harris, 102 Wn.2d 148, 155 , 685 P. 2d 584 ( 1984) overruled on other grounds by State v. Brown, 111 Wn.2d 124 , 761 P. 2d 3 Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S. Ct. 2052 , 80 L. | 2 | 1988–2013 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences2013State v. Harris, 102 Wn.2d 148, 155 , 685 P. 2d 584 ( 1984) overruled on other grounds by State v. Brown, 111 Wn.2d 124 , 761 P. 2d 3 Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S. Ct. 2052 , 80 L. 2013State v. Harris, 102 Wn.2d 148, 155 , 685 P. 2d 584 ( 1984) overruled on other grounds by State v. Brown, 111 Wn.2d 124 , 761 P. 2d 3 Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S. Ct. 2052 , 80 L. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Brown
green
1 sentence2013State v. Harris, 102 Wn.2d 148, 155 , 685 P. 2d 584 ( 1984) overruled on other grounds by State v. Brown, 111 Wn.2d 124 , 761 P. 2d 3 Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S. Ct. 2052 , 80 L. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Johnson
green
1 sentence1988State v. Harris, 102 Wn.2d 148, 155 , 685 P.2d 584 (1984); State v. Johnson, 40 Wn. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
State v. Jackson
green
2 sentences1986State v. Jackson, 102 Wn.2d 689, 693-94 , 689 P.2d 76 (1984). 1986State v. Jackson, 102 Wn.2d 689, 693-94 , 689 P.2d 76 (1984). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
United States v. Howard Dale Bernard, United States of America v. Ralph Maurice Comstock, Jr.
green
1 sentence1984While the majority of courts have held that it is preferable to give a cautionary jury instruction whenever the prosecution introduces accomplice testimony, State v. Moore, 229 Kan. 73 , 622 P.2d 631 (1981), and have held the failure to give a cautionary instruction reversible error when such testimony is wholly uncorroborated, see, e.g., United States v. Bernard, 625 F.2d 854 (9th Cir. 1980); cf. United States v. Slocum, 695 F.2d 650 (2d Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1015 (1983) (error only reversible where defendant has suffered "substantial prejudice"), the courts have differed regardi | 1 | 1984–1984 |
United States v. Robert W. Slocum
green
1 sentence1984While the majority of courts have held that it is preferable to give a cautionary jury instruction whenever the prosecution introduces accomplice testimony, State v. Moore, 229 Kan. 73 , 622 P.2d 631 (1981), and have held the failure to give a cautionary instruction reversible error when such testimony is wholly uncorroborated, see, e.g., United States v. Bernard, 625 F.2d 854 (9th Cir. 1980); cf. United States v. Slocum, 695 F.2d 650 (2d Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1015 (1983) (error only reversible where defendant has suffered "substantial prejudice"), the courts have differed regardi | 1 | 1984–1984 |
United States v. Malcolm Moore
green
1 sentence1984Some federal courts look to whether the accomplice testimony supplied the only strong evidence of guilt, United States v. Moore, 700 F.2d 535 (9th Cir. 1983), while others are satisfied if aspects of the testimony are corroborated, United States v. Wright, 573 F.2d 681 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 949 , 56 L. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
State v. Moore
green
2 sentences1984While the majority of courts have held that it is preferable to give a cautionary jury instruction whenever the prosecution introduces accomplice testimony, State v. Moore, 229 Kan. 73 , 622 P.2d 631 (1981), and have held the failure to give a cautionary instruction reversible error when such testimony is wholly uncorroborated, see, e.g., United States v. Bernard, 625 F.2d 854 (9th Cir. 1980); cf. United States v. Slocum, 695 F.2d 650 (2d Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1015 (1983) (error only reversible where defendant has suffered "substantial prejudice"), the courts have differed regardi 1984While the majority of courts have held that it is preferable to give a cautionary jury instruction whenever the prosecution introduces accomplice testimony, State v. Moore, 229 Kan. 73 , 622 P.2d 631 (1981), and have held the failure to give a cautionary instruction reversible error when such testimony is wholly uncorroborated, see, e.g., United States v. Bernard, 625 F.2d 854 (9th Cir. 1980); cf. United States v. Slocum, 695 F.2d 650 (2d Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1015 (1983) (error only reversible where defendant has suffered "substantial prejudice"), the courts have differed regardi | 1 | 1984–1984 |
United States v. Henry J. Wright, Jr.
green
1 sentence1984Some federal courts look to whether the accomplice testimony supplied the only strong evidence of guilt, United States v. Moore, 700 F.2d 535 (9th Cir. 1983), while others are satisfied if aspects of the testimony are corroborated, United States v. Wright, 573 F.2d 681 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 949 , 56 L. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Hernandez v. United States
green
1 sentence1984Some federal courts look to whether the accomplice testimony supplied the only strong evidence of guilt, United States v. Moore, 700 F.2d 535 (9th Cir. 1983), while others are satisfied if aspects of the testimony are corroborated, United States v. Wright, 573 F.2d 681 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 949 , 56 L. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Sexton v. Maynard
green
1 sentence1984While the majority of courts have held that it is preferable to give a cautionary jury instruction whenever the prosecution introduces accomplice testimony, State v. Moore, 229 Kan. 73 , 622 P.2d 631 (1981), and have held the failure to give a cautionary instruction reversible error when such testimony is wholly uncorroborated, see, e.g., United States v. Bernard, 625 F.2d 854 (9th Cir. 1980); cf. United States v. Slocum, 695 F.2d 650 (2d Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1015 (1983) (error only reversible where defendant has suffered "substantial prejudice"), the courts have differed regardi | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.