cautionary jury instruction (Iowa) · Go Syfert
← Iowa issues

cautionary jury instruction in Iowa

5 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 2019–2023 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
State of Iowa v. Antoine Tyree Williamsgreen
iowa · 2019 · cited in 2 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023
2 sentences

2023“Additionally, we review the refusal to give a cautionary jury instruction for abuse of discretion.” State v. Williams, 929 N.W.2d 621, 628 (Iowa 2019).

2023See State v. Williams, 929 N.W.2d 621, 628 (Iowa 2019) (“[W]e review the refusal to give a cautionary jury instruction for abuse of discretion.”).8 As explained, Michael Allison was a federal detainee who bunked near Burns in the Cedar Rapids jail.

22
State of Iowa v. Kelvin Plain Sr.green
iowa · 2017 · cited in 2 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019
2 sentences

2019See Plain, 898 N.W.2d at 811 .

2019See Plain , 898 N.W.2d at 811 .

22
State v. Whitegreen
iowa · 2003 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023
1 sentence

2023“Evidence is unfairly prejudicial if it[] ‘[a]ppeals to the jury’s sympathies, arouses its sense of horror, provokes its instinct to punish, or triggers other mainsprings of human action that may cause the jury to base its decision on something other than the established propositions in the case.’” State v. White, 668 N.W.2d 850, 854 (Iowa 2003) (second alteration in original) (citation omitted).

11
State of Iowa v. Ricky Lee Putmangreen
iowa · 2014 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023
1 sentence

2023State v. Neiderbach, 837 N.W.2d 3 Through a cautionary jury instruction, the district court explained the limited purpose for the evidence of Mootz’s “other acts”: “If you find other acts occurred then and only then may such other acts be considered for the purpose of establishing knowledge or absence of mistake.” See Putman, 848 N.W.2d at 15 (noting a limiting instruction “is an antidote for the danger of prejudice”). 9 180, 202 (Iowa 2013).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Where else courts name it

PA 82 (1981–2025) MS 26 (1980–2026) MT 23 (1984–2026) UT 17 (1985–2026) OH 13 (1991–2024) WI 12 (1998–2025) IL 6 (1970–2021) KS 6 (1996–2021) FL 5 (1974–1998) WA 5 (1984–2013) IA 5 (2019–2023) VA 5 (1989–2025) CT 5 (1997–2025) ND 5 (1998–2019) NH 5 (1991–2024) NV 4 (1996–2015) MI 4 (1975–2018) AZ 4 (2012–2021) OR 4 (1999–2025) HI 3 (2012–2018) RI 3 (2002–2026) NY 2 (2008–2015) CO 2 (2025–2025) MD 2 (1992–2013)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check