express language exception (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

express language exception in Illinois

6 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1895–2009 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
People v. Owensgreen
illappct · 1979 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992
1 sentence

1992See People v. Owens (1979), 69 Ill.

11
People v. Kunzegreen
illappct · 1990 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992
1 sentence

1992App. 3d 708, 728 , 550 N.E.2d 284, 298 (Steigmann, J., specially concurring)), and the express language of the rule makes it equally applicable to all witnesses, whether called by the State or the defense.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (14)

CaseCitedYears
Illinois Farmers Insurance v. Hall green
illappct · 2006
2 sentences

2006Hall, 363 Ill.

2006Hall, 363 Ill.

22006–2006
Virginia Surety Co. v. Northern Insurance green
ill · 2007
1 sentence

2009American Family, in turn, grounds its claim that the exclusion provision applies on the express language of clause 18: “FDI agrees to indemnify and hold harmless The Gap *** against any and all liability *** resulting from (i) personal injury *** arising in whole or in part *** from the performance of the Work, whether by FDI or any subcontractor.” In Virginia Surety Co., the supreme court resolved “the split in the appellate districts” on what constitutes an “ ‘insured contract.’ ” Virginia Surety Co., 224 Ill. 2d at 555 .

12009–2009
Pettie v. Williams Brothers Construction, Inc. green
illappct · 1991
1 sentence

1992Pettie, 216 Ill.

11992–1992
M'iver, Lessees v. Ragan green
scotus · 1817
1 sentence

1895Bedell v. Janney, 4 Gilm. 193 ; Hazell v. Shelby, 11 Ill. 9 ; Stevenson v. Westfall, 18 id. 209; Pells v. Snell, 130 id. 379; Bassett v. Bassett, 55 Barb. 505 ; Rockwood v. Whiting, 118 Mass. 337 ; Angell on Limitations, (6th ed.) secs. 485-487, 194; Wood on Limitations, sec. 252; Sacia v. DeGraaf, 1 Cow. 356 ; McIver v. Ragan, 2 Wheat. 25 ; Amy v. Watertown, 130 U. S. 320 ; Parker v. Kelly, 61 Wis. 552 ; Pryor v. Reyburn, 16 Ark. 671 ; Powell v. Patterson, 76 Me. 196 ; Fairbanks v. Long, 91 Mo. 628 ; Dozier v. Ellis, 28 Miss. 730 .

11895–1895
Amy v. Watertown green
scotus · 1889
1 sentence

1895Bedell v. Janney, 4 Gilm. 193 ; Hazell v. Shelby, 11 Ill. 9 ; Stevenson v. Westfall, 18 id. 209; Pells v. Snell, 130 id. 379; Bassett v. Bassett, 55 Barb. 505 ; Rockwood v. Whiting, 118 Mass. 337 ; Angell on Limitations, (6th ed.) secs. 485-487, 194; Wood on Limitations, sec. 252; Sacia v. DeGraaf, 1 Cow. 356 ; McIver v. Ragan, 2 Wheat. 25 ; Amy v. Watertown, 130 U. S. 320 ; Parker v. Kelly, 61 Wis. 552 ; Pryor v. Reyburn, 16 Ark. 671 ; Powell v. Patterson, 76 Me. 196 ; Fairbanks v. Long, 91 Mo. 628 ; Dozier v. Ellis, 28 Miss. 730 .

11895–1895
Hazell v. Shelby neutral
ill · 1849
1 sentence

1895Bedell v. Janney, 4 Gilm. 193 ; Hazell v. Shelby, 11 Ill. 9 ; Stevenson v. Westfall, 18 id. 209; Pells v. Snell, 130 id. 379; Bassett v. Bassett, 55 Barb. 505 ; Rockwood v. Whiting, 118 Mass. 337 ; Angell on Limitations, (6th ed.) secs. 485-487, 194; Wood on Limitations, sec. 252; Sacia v. DeGraaf, 1 Cow. 356 ; McIver v. Ragan, 2 Wheat. 25 ; Amy v. Watertown, 130 U. S. 320 ; Parker v. Kelly, 61 Wis. 552 ; Pryor v. Reyburn, 16 Ark. 671 ; Powell v. Patterson, 76 Me. 196 ; Fairbanks v. Long, 91 Mo. 628 ; Dozier v. Ellis, 28 Miss. 730 .

11895–1895
Dozier v. Ellis neutral
miss · 1855
1 sentence

1895Bedell v. Janney, 4 Gilm. 193 ; Hazell v. Shelby, 11 Ill. 9 ; Stevenson v. Westfall, 18 id. 209; Pells v. Snell, 130 id. 379; Bassett v. Bassett, 55 Barb. 505 ; Rockwood v. Whiting, 118 Mass. 337 ; Angell on Limitations, (6th ed.) secs. 485-487, 194; Wood on Limitations, sec. 252; Sacia v. DeGraaf, 1 Cow. 356 ; McIver v. Ragan, 2 Wheat. 25 ; Amy v. Watertown, 130 U. S. 320 ; Parker v. Kelly, 61 Wis. 552 ; Pryor v. Reyburn, 16 Ark. 671 ; Powell v. Patterson, 76 Me. 196 ; Fairbanks v. Long, 91 Mo. 628 ; Dozier v. Ellis, 28 Miss. 730 .

11895–1895
Fairbanks v. Long neutral
mo · 1887
1 sentence

1895Bedell v. Janney, 4 Gilm. 193 ; Hazell v. Shelby, 11 Ill. 9 ; Stevenson v. Westfall, 18 id. 209; Pells v. Snell, 130 id. 379; Bassett v. Bassett, 55 Barb. 505 ; Rockwood v. Whiting, 118 Mass. 337 ; Angell on Limitations, (6th ed.) secs. 485-487, 194; Wood on Limitations, sec. 252; Sacia v. DeGraaf, 1 Cow. 356 ; McIver v. Ragan, 2 Wheat. 25 ; Amy v. Watertown, 130 U. S. 320 ; Parker v. Kelly, 61 Wis. 552 ; Pryor v. Reyburn, 16 Ark. 671 ; Powell v. Patterson, 76 Me. 196 ; Fairbanks v. Long, 91 Mo. 628 ; Dozier v. Ellis, 28 Miss. 730 .

11895–1895
Rockwood v. Whiting neutral
mass · 1875
1 sentence

1895Bedell v. Janney, 4 Gilm. 193 ; Hazell v. Shelby, 11 Ill. 9 ; Stevenson v. Westfall, 18 id. 209; Pells v. Snell, 130 id. 379; Bassett v. Bassett, 55 Barb. 505 ; Rockwood v. Whiting, 118 Mass. 337 ; Angell on Limitations, (6th ed.) secs. 485-487, 194; Wood on Limitations, sec. 252; Sacia v. DeGraaf, 1 Cow. 356 ; McIver v. Ragan, 2 Wheat. 25 ; Amy v. Watertown, 130 U. S. 320 ; Parker v. Kelly, 61 Wis. 552 ; Pryor v. Reyburn, 16 Ark. 671 ; Powell v. Patterson, 76 Me. 196 ; Fairbanks v. Long, 91 Mo. 628 ; Dozier v. Ellis, 28 Miss. 730 .

11895–1895
Pryor v. Ryburn neutral
ark · 1856
1 sentence

1895Bedell v. Janney, 4 Gilm. 193 ; Hazell v. Shelby, 11 Ill. 9 ; Stevenson v. Westfall, 18 id. 209; Pells v. Snell, 130 id. 379; Bassett v. Bassett, 55 Barb. 505 ; Rockwood v. Whiting, 118 Mass. 337 ; Angell on Limitations, (6th ed.) secs. 485-487, 194; Wood on Limitations, sec. 252; Sacia v. DeGraaf, 1 Cow. 356 ; McIver v. Ragan, 2 Wheat. 25 ; Amy v. Watertown, 130 U. S. 320 ; Parker v. Kelly, 61 Wis. 552 ; Pryor v. Reyburn, 16 Ark. 671 ; Powell v. Patterson, 76 Me. 196 ; Fairbanks v. Long, 91 Mo. 628 ; Dozier v. Ellis, 28 Miss. 730 .

11895–1895
Rowell v. Patterson neutral
me · 1884
1 sentence

1895Bedell v. Janney, 4 Gilm. 193 ; Hazell v. Shelby, 11 Ill. 9 ; Stevenson v. Westfall, 18 id. 209; Pells v. Snell, 130 id. 379; Bassett v. Bassett, 55 Barb. 505 ; Rockwood v. Whiting, 118 Mass. 337 ; Angell on Limitations, (6th ed.) secs. 485-487, 194; Wood on Limitations, sec. 252; Sacia v. DeGraaf, 1 Cow. 356 ; McIver v. Ragan, 2 Wheat. 25 ; Amy v. Watertown, 130 U. S. 320 ; Parker v. Kelly, 61 Wis. 552 ; Pryor v. Reyburn, 16 Ark. 671 ; Powell v. Patterson, 76 Me. 196 ; Fairbanks v. Long, 91 Mo. 628 ; Dozier v. Ellis, 28 Miss. 730 .

11895–1895
Parker v. Kelly neutral
wis · 1884
1 sentence

1895Bedell v. Janney, 4 Gilm. 193 ; Hazell v. Shelby, 11 Ill. 9 ; Stevenson v. Westfall, 18 id. 209; Pells v. Snell, 130 id. 379; Bassett v. Bassett, 55 Barb. 505 ; Rockwood v. Whiting, 118 Mass. 337 ; Angell on Limitations, (6th ed.) secs. 485-487, 194; Wood on Limitations, sec. 252; Sacia v. DeGraaf, 1 Cow. 356 ; McIver v. Ragan, 2 Wheat. 25 ; Amy v. Watertown, 130 U. S. 320 ; Parker v. Kelly, 61 Wis. 552 ; Pryor v. Reyburn, 16 Ark. 671 ; Powell v. Patterson, 76 Me. 196 ; Fairbanks v. Long, 91 Mo. 628 ; Dozier v. Ellis, 28 Miss. 730 .

11895–1895
Bassett v. Bassett neutral
nysupct · 1870
1 sentence

1895Bedell v. Janney, 4 Gilm. 193 ; Hazell v. Shelby, 11 Ill. 9 ; Stevenson v. Westfall, 18 id. 209; Pells v. Snell, 130 id. 379; Bassett v. Bassett, 55 Barb. 505 ; Rockwood v. Whiting, 118 Mass. 337 ; Angell on Limitations, (6th ed.) secs. 485-487, 194; Wood on Limitations, sec. 252; Sacia v. DeGraaf, 1 Cow. 356 ; McIver v. Ragan, 2 Wheat. 25 ; Amy v. Watertown, 130 U. S. 320 ; Parker v. Kelly, 61 Wis. 552 ; Pryor v. Reyburn, 16 Ark. 671 ; Powell v. Patterson, 76 Me. 196 ; Fairbanks v. Long, 91 Mo. 628 ; Dozier v. Ellis, 28 Miss. 730 .

11895–1895
Sacia v. De Graaf. neutral
nysupct · 1823
1 sentence

1895Bedell v. Janney, 4 Gilm. 193 ; Hazell v. Shelby, 11 Ill. 9 ; Stevenson v. Westfall, 18 id. 209; Pells v. Snell, 130 id. 379; Bassett v. Bassett, 55 Barb. 505 ; Rockwood v. Whiting, 118 Mass. 337 ; Angell on Limitations, (6th ed.) secs. 485-487, 194; Wood on Limitations, sec. 252; Sacia v. DeGraaf, 1 Cow. 356 ; McIver v. Ragan, 2 Wheat. 25 ; Amy v. Watertown, 130 U. S. 320 ; Parker v. Kelly, 61 Wis. 552 ; Pryor v. Reyburn, 16 Ark. 671 ; Powell v. Patterson, 76 Me. 196 ; Fairbanks v. Long, 91 Mo. 628 ; Dozier v. Ellis, 28 Miss. 730 .

11895–1895

Where else courts name it

TX 19 (1989–2021) CA 13 (1933–2025) NY 7 (1888–2011) IN 6 (2002–2024) IL 6 (1895–2009) FL 5 (1990–2013) IA 5 (1987–2023) OH 5 (1978–2017) MN 4 (1985–2019) CO 4 (1995–2012) WA 4 (1923–2021) OR 4 (2009–2013) MI 4 (1983–2003) MO 3 (1931–1990) WI 2 (1940–2005) WV 2 (2003–2003) NJ 2 (1964–2026) KS 2 (1999–2010) KY 2 (2009–2017) DC 2 (1981–1987) UT 2 (2020–2021) PA 2 (2016–2024) AZ 2 (2009–2010)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check