express language rule (Iowa) · Go Syfert
← Iowa issues

express language rule in Iowa

5 Iowa opinions name it 1 courts 1987–2023 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Nibali v. United Statesgreen
cc · 1980 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987
2 sentences

1987Nibali v. United States, 225 Ct.Cl. 8 , 634 F.2d 494, 497 (1980).

1987Nibali v. United States, 225 Ct.Cl. 8 , 634 F.2d 494, 497 (1980).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Sorensen Ex Rel. Sorensen v. Shaklee Corp. green
iowa · 1990
2 sentences

2023Id.

2023Id.

22023–2023
Allied Gas & Chemical Co. v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co. green
iowa · 1983
2 sentences

2016Id.

2016Id.

22016–2016

Where else courts name it

TX 19 (1989–2021) CA 13 (1933–2025) NY 7 (1888–2011) IN 6 (2002–2024) IL 6 (1895–2009) FL 5 (1990–2013) IA 5 (1987–2023) OH 5 (1978–2017) OR 4 (2009–2013) CO 4 (1995–2012) WA 4 (1923–2021) MI 4 (1983–2003) MN 4 (1985–2019) MO 3 (1931–1990) KS 2 (1999–2010) NJ 2 (1964–2026) PA 2 (2016–2024) DC 2 (1981–1987) UT 2 (2020–2021) AZ 2 (2009–2010) WI 2 (1940–2005) KY 2 (2009–2017) WV 2 (2003–2003)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check