Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Juragreen1 sentence2023See Jura, 352 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Mitchell
green
2 sentences2019Id. at 196 . ¶ 83 In Green, the trial court denied defendant’s motion to reopen the voir dire of three venirepersons who had stated on their jury cards that they were the victims of a crime, but who had failed to indicate they were crime victims when questioned in open court. 2018Id. at 196 , 76 Ill.Dec. 714 , 459 N.E.2d 351 . ¶ 83 In Green , the trial court denied defendant's motion to reopen the voir dire of three venirepersons who had stated on their jury cards that they were the victims of a crime, but who had failed to indicate they were crime victims when questioned in open court. | 2 | 2018–2019 |
People v. Jocko
green
2 sentences2010The cause was remanded for the limited purpose of an inquiry into defendant’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. 389 Ill. 2010The cause was remanded for the limited purpose of an inquiry into defendant’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. 389 Ill. | 2 | 2010–2010 |
People v. Boling
green
1 sentence2023The need for the evidence is slight, the likelihood of misuse great.” Boling, 2014 IL App (4th) 120634, ¶ 108 . 35 No. 19-2463 ¶ 98 Moreover, it is improper for the prosecution to rely on such hearsay beyond the limited purpose of the exception in arguments to the jury. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
People v. Cole
green
1 sentence1984Even if evidence of defendant’s guilt was sufficient, issues involving the right to a fair trial by a panel of impartial jurors cannot be disposed of by the harmless error rule (People v. Cole (1973), 54 Ill. 2d 401, 411 ; People v. Oliver (1977), 50 Ill. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
People v. Oliver
neutral
1 sentence1984Even if evidence of defendant’s guilt was sufficient, issues involving the right to a fair trial by a panel of impartial jurors cannot be disposed of by the harmless error rule (People v. Cole (1973), 54 Ill. 2d 401, 411 ; People v. Oliver (1977), 50 Ill. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.