burden of proving reversible error (Indiana) · Go Syfert
← Indiana issues

burden of proving reversible error in Indiana

6 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 1982–1987 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Ferguson v. Stategreen
indctapp · 1985 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1985–1985
1 sentence

1985Id. at 164-65 (citations omitted).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Barnd v. Borst green
indctapp · 1982
2 sentences

1985The burden of proving reversible error is on the appellant." Barnd v. Borst (1982), Ind.App., 431 N.E.2d 161 (citations omitted).

1985The burden of proving reversible error is on the appellant." Barnd v. Borst (1982), Ind.App., 431 N.E.2d 161 (citations omitted).

31983–1985
Nahmias Realty, Inc. v. Cohen green
indctapp · 1985
1 sentence

1987Id.

11987–1987
English Coal Co., Inc. v. Durcholz green
indctapp · 1981
1 sentence

1982English Coal v. Durcholz, supra. With these standards of appellate review before us we turn our attention to the issues at hand.

11982–1982

Where else courts name it

IN 6 (1982–1987) MO 5 (1983–2023) CA 4 (2021–2023) MT 2 (2023–2023)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check