defendant can present error (Indiana) · Go Syfert
← Indiana issues

defendant can present error in Indiana

6 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 1992–1997 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
McHugh v. Stategreen
ind · 1984 · cited in 3 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1992–1997
2 sentences

1997McHugh v. State, 471 N.E.2d 293, 294 (Ind.1984).

1997McHugh v. State, 471 N.E.2d 293, 294 (Ind.1984).

23
Lowery v. Stategreen
ind · 1994 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997
1 sentence

1997Lowery v. State, 640 N.E.2d 1031, 1036 (Ind.1994).

11
Hamilton v. Stategreen
indctapp · 1993 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997
1 sentence

1997Hamilton v. State, 618 N.E.2d 52, 53 (Ind.Ct.App.1993), trans. denied.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Sewell v. State green
indctapp · 1992
1 sentence

1993Sewell v. State (1992), Ind.App., 592 N.E.2d 705, 707 .

11993–1993

Where else courts name it

IN 6 (1992–1997) CT 3 (1995–2000)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check