Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 2017–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bieghler v. Stategreen1 sentence2020Ellis’ claim fits into the second category. [20] A finding of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is very rare because “the decision of what issues to raise is one of the most important strategic decisions to be made by appellate counsel.” Bieghler v. State, 690 N.E.2d 188, 193 (Ind. 1997), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1021 (1998) (internal quotation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
In the Matter of the Adoption of O.R., N.R. v. K.G. and C.G.green1 sentence2020Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 19A-CR-2349 | June 12, 2020 Page 4 of 6 file timely a Notice of Appeal.” In re Adoption of O.R., 16 N.E.3d 965, 971 (Ind. 2014). [11] Here, the trial court entered its order denying Ellis’ motion on August 5, 2019. | 1 | 1 |
Taylor v. Stategreen1 sentence2018See Taylor v. State, 929 N.E.2d 912 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010) (counsel did not render ineffective assistance by failing to object to admission of shotgun into evidence; gun was found in plain view during a valid protective sweep, so no Fourth Amendment violation), trans. denied. [16] We next address Ellis’ claim that the trial court should not have granted the State’s motion to amend the charging information post-trial to allege that conspiracy to commit robbery, rather than robbery, was the predicate felony for the charge of possession of a handgun by a serious violent felon. | 1 | 1 |
Crawford v. Washingtongreen1 sentence2017See Jones v. State, 982 N.E.2d 417, 421-22 (Ind. Ct. App. 2013) (constitutional challenges are reviewed de novo), trans. denied. [10] The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees that, “[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right … to be confronted with the witnesses against him….” In Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 68 (2004), the United States Supreme Court held that the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment prohibits admission in a criminal trial of testimonial statements by a person who is absent from trial, unless the person is unavailab | 1 | 1 |
William H. Ellis, Sr. v. State of Indianagreen1 sentence2017See Ellis, 58 N.E.3d at 941 (reversing post-conviction court’s denial of Ellis’s petition for credit time where the court denied Ellis’s motion without first considering 4 Wright attached an “Offender Information System” print-out notarized by DOC staff which shows the programs he has received credit for and those he has not. | 1 | 1 |
Edwin Jones v. State of Indianagreen1 sentence2017See Jones v. State, 982 N.E.2d 417, 421-22 (Ind. Ct. App. 2013) (constitutional challenges are reviewed de novo), trans. denied. [10] The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees that, “[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right … to be confronted with the witnesses against him….” In Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 68 (2004), the United States Supreme Court held that the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment prohibits admission in a criminal trial of testimonial statements by a person who is absent from trial, unless the person is unavailab | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lockhart v. United States
green
1 sentence2020Ellis’ claim fits into the second category. [20] A finding of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is very rare because “the decision of what issues to raise is one of the most important strategic decisions to be made by appellate counsel.” Bieghler v. State, 690 N.E.2d 188, 193 (Ind. 1997), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1021 (1998) (internal quotation omitted). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Robinson v. State
green
1 sentence2017Because we conclude that any error in the trial court’s 1996 judgment of conviction is deemed to have been corrected by the presumption set forth by the Indiana Supreme Court in Robinson v. State, 805 N.E.2d 783 (Ind. 2004), we affirm. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.