Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1973–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.red2 sentences2024See Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d at 204 (providing that an order that grants more relief that the movant is entitled to “makes the order reversible, but not interlocutory.”). 7 interlocutory merely because the record does not afford a legal basis for the adjudication.” Id. at 206 . 2024See Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d at 204 (providing that an order that grants more relief that the movant is entitled to “makes the order reversible, but not interlocutory.”). 7 interlocutory merely because the record does not afford a legal basis for the adjudication.” Id. at 206 . | 1 | 1 |
In re Lipskygreen1 sentence2021In one part of her appeal brief, Ellis describes them as oral communications during meetings with Snell on December 12, 2018, and December 18, 2018, but elsewhere in her TCPA motion and appeal brief, Ellis describes them as “omissions.” 9 The record does not indicate that the trial court ruled on Ellis’s objection, and the parties present no issue in this appeal regarding Snell’s exhibit. –6– STANDARD OF REVIEW AND APPLICABLE LAW As an anti-SLAPP statute,10 the TCPA “protects citizens who petition or speak on matters of public concern from retaliatory lawsuits that seek to intimidate or silenc | 1 | 1 |
Insurance Co. of North America v. Morrisgreen1 sentence2000Insurance Co. of N. Am. v. Morris , 981 S.W.2d 667, 675 (Tex. 1998). | 1 | 1 |
Ellis v. Heidrickgreen1 sentence1996For example in Ellis v. Heidrick, 154 S.W.2d 293, 294 (Tex.Civ.App.—San Antonio 1941, writ ref'd w.o.m.), Heidrick, the defendant, claimed Ellis’ claim for conversion was barred by the two-year statute of limitations. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Gibson v. Ellis
green
1 sentence2004Id. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Maritime Overseas Corp. v. Ellis
green
2 sentences1998Following argument, the en banc court affirmed the actual damages award, but reversed the trial court’s judgment for exemplary damages and prejudgment interest. 886 S.W.2d 780 . 1998Following argument, the en banc court affirmed the actual damages award, but reversed the trial court's judgment for exemplary damages and prejudgment interest. 886 S.W.2d 780 . | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Durrett v. Boger
green
1 sentence1973This type of affidavit has been condemned in Durrett v. Boger, 234 S.W.2d 898 (Tex.Civ.App.— Texarkana 1950, no writ). | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Hinn v. Continental National Bank of Fort Worth
green
1 sentence1973This conclusion is also supported by Hinn v. Continental National Bank of Fort Worth, 495 S.W.2d 286 (Tex.Civ.App.—Fort Worth 1973, no writ hist.) It will be noted that Ellis’ plea of privilege was sworn to by the affiant “to the best of his knowledge”. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.