estoppel in pais doctrine (Indiana) · Go Syfert
← Indiana issues

estoppel in pais doctrine in Indiana

6 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 1863–1906 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Fletcher v. Holmes green
ind · 1865
2 sentences

1884In Fletcher v. Holmes, 25 Ind. 458 , it was held by this court that the doctrine of estoppel in pais “ can have no application where everything was equally known to both parties,” and so this court has uniformly held.

1881In Fletcher v. Holmes, 25 Ind. 458 , it was held by this court, that the doctrine of estoppel in pais, “ can have no application where every thing was equally known to both parties.” It was not alleged in said paragraph of answer, that the appellees or those interested with them, had misrepresented, or had covered up or concealed any material facts, or that the appellant and its officers were ignorant of the truth of any of the matters, in connection with said annexation proceedings.

21881–1884
Abbot v. Wilbur neutral
la · 1870
1 sentence

1906“A party who has acquiesced in a judgment cannot sue to annul it, no matter how radical its defects, or absolute its nullity.” Abbot v. Wilbur (1870), 22 La.

11906–1906
Kinney v. Whiton green
conn · 1877
1 sentence

1892As was said by the Supreme Court of Connecticut in Kinney v. Whiton, 44 Conn. 262 ( 26 Am.

11892–1892
City of Columbus v. Dahn green
ind · 1871
1 sentence

1878So does the case of The City of Columbus v. Dahn, 36 Ind. 330 .

11878–1878
Gatling v. Rodman green
ind · 1855
1 sentence

1863Gatling v. Rodman, 6 Ind. 289 , is full to this point.

11863–1863

Where else courts name it

TX 25 (1946–2010) IL 22 (1878–1999) NY 15 (1851–2017) MD 10 (1868–2012) WI 7 (1888–1960) NE 7 (1896–2022) CA 6 (1864–1970) IN 6 (1863–1906) NC 6 (1918–1987) CO 6 (1897–2007) MO 5 (1894–2007) VA 4 (1907–1982) NJ 4 (1872–1963) ME 4 (1932–2004) GA 3 (1884–1940) ND 3 (1900–1926) AL 3 (1898–1975) MS 3 (1916–1984) MT 3 (1910–2022) OR 3 (1898–1928) WA 2 (1943–1953) SD 2 (2002–2025) NH 2 (1852–1868) CT 2 (1897–1913) OH 2 (1870–1871) MA 2 (1864–1977) AZ 2 (1968–1971)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check